House Panel to Hold Public Hearing on Unexplained Aerial Sightings

nivek

As Above So Below
REVEALED: Drones that swarmed US warships off the coast of California in 2019 were from a mysterious Hong Kong-registered spy ship, say US Navy

  • The Pentagon has previously disclosed intriguing photos showing unidentified aerial phenomena flying above US warships in 2019
  • Last month, during a hotly-anticipated Congressional hearing into UAP and possible UFO sightings, military officials said some sightings had been explained
  • On Friday military intelligence website The Drive published new information, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act, about the sightings
  • The found that, off the coast of southern California, there were 10 encounters with suspicious drones from March 30, 2019 to July 30, 2019
  • On July 15, 2019, two US warships - the USS Paul Hamilton and the USS Bunker Hill - reported being followed by drones from a Hong Kong-flagged cargo ship
  • The warships radioed the ship, MV Bass Strait, but received no answer: Bass Strait's owner-operator, Hong Kong-based Pacific Basin, has not commented
  • Other incidents saw drones launched by 'local fisherman operating personal quadcopters', and by pleasure craft that failed to respond to radio messages
58942273-10906101-image-a-75_1654926389284.jpg


58942405-10906101-_MV_Bass_Strait_likely_using_UAVs_unidentified_aerial_vehicles_t-a-79_1654926389385.jpg


March 30, 2019

- USS Harpers Ferry reports as many as eight unknown drones flying directly over the ship at an altitude of about 500 feet, 'conducting collection operations'.

April 24, 2019

- USS Zumwalt identifies six drones flying overhead in a 'consistent pattern' that did not alter 'course, speed, or altitude.'

July 15, 2019

- USS Paul Hamilton followed by drones for four hours from MV Bass Strait.

- USS Bunker Hill followed by 11 drones from MV Bass Strait.

- USS Ralph Johnson reports a suspected 14 drones surrounding it.

July 17, 2019

- USS Russell reports three suspected drones flying over it for an hour, from an unknown location.

July 21, 2019

- USS Paul Hamilton again reports drones ahead, this time believed to be 'local fisherman operating personal quadcopters.'

July 25, 2019

- USS Gabrielle Giffords finds four drones overhead, and request help from the nearby USS Pinckney. Three small boats were nearby.

July 30, 2019

- USS Russell sees two groups of lights, containing five drones, over a period of about three hours. Communication was never established with the nearby pleasure craft.

- USS Paul Hamilton reports multiple drones overhead, some only 200 yards away.


(More on the link)

.
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
REVEALED: Drones that swarmed US warships off the coast of California in 2019 were from a mysterious Hong Kong-registered spy ship, say US Navy




    • The Pentagon has previously disclosed intriguing photos showing unidentified aerial phenomena flying above US warships in 2019



    • Last month, during a hotly-anticipated Congressional hearing into UAP and possible UFO sightings, military officials said some sightings had been explained



    • On Friday military intelligence website The Drive published new information, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act, about the sightings



    • The found that, off the coast of southern California, there were 10 encounters with suspicious drones from March 30, 2019 to July 30, 2019



    • On July 15, 2019, two US warships - the USS Paul Hamilton and the USS Bunker Hill - reported being followed by drones from a Hong Kong-flagged cargo ship



    • The warships radioed the ship, MV Bass Strait, but received no answer: Bass Strait's owner-operator, Hong Kong-based Pacific Basin, has not commented



    • Other incidents saw drones launched by 'local fisherman operating personal quadcopters', and by pleasure craft that failed to respond to radio messages
58942273-10906101-image-a-75_1654926389284.jpg


58942405-10906101-_MV_Bass_Strait_likely_using_UAVs_unidentified_aerial_vehicles_t-a-79_1654926389385.jpg


March 30, 2019

- USS Harpers Ferry reports as many as eight unknown drones flying directly over the ship at an altitude of about 500 feet, 'conducting collection operations'.

April 24, 2019

- USS Zumwalt identifies six drones flying overhead in a 'consistent pattern' that did not alter 'course, speed, or altitude.'

July 15, 2019

- USS Paul Hamilton followed by drones for four hours from MV Bass Strait.

- USS Bunker Hill followed by 11 drones from MV Bass Strait.

- USS Ralph Johnson reports a suspected 14 drones surrounding it.

July 17, 2019

- USS Russell reports three suspected drones flying over it for an hour, from an unknown location.

July 21, 2019

- USS Paul Hamilton again reports drones ahead, this time believed to be 'local fisherman operating personal quadcopters.'

July 25, 2019

- USS Gabrielle Giffords finds four drones overhead, and request help from the nearby USS Pinckney. Three small boats were nearby.

July 30, 2019

- USS Russell sees two groups of lights, containing five drones, over a period of about three hours. Communication was never established with the nearby pleasure craft.

- USS Paul Hamilton reports multiple drones overhead, some only 200 yards away.


(More on the link)

.


yuh huh

upload_2022-6-12_7-8-15.gif
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
Serious question - how many **** if any *** of these incidents did Jeremy Corbell hype ?

I stopped paying attention to him but seem to remember him going on about some of these.
 
I don't listen to Corbell that much. He is a parasite on this subject and a very poor "documentary maker". Woudn't be surprised if someone leaked him some table scraps with an intresting story, while they were pretty sure they werent genuine anomalous UAP cases. Gaslighting and disinformation, he was used to keep the waters muddy. This is the problem with anonymous sources, you can't really tell what their true agenda is.
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
With any of these incidents there is a group that screams ET instantly and the people 'having the conversation' with them are the ones asking us to take them seriously. If the Navy vessels contacted that MV directly at the time then it was under no illusion as to the source
 

Todd Feinman

Show us the satellite pics...
The military doesn't want to talk about it and they are only releasing the very worst, least convincing evidence to the public. When UFOs were encountered in the 40s and 50s a policy of denial and opacity was put into place and "through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are (were) led to believe the unknown flying objects were nonsense". This was done for national security reasons, because even then it was known that the objects were not a human technology and we had to buy time to understand what they were without getting the public involved or tipping off adversaries as to out progress. The RAND report from George Kocher in '68 which RAND hadn't released to the public and is available now on their FAQs page, acknowledged that the phenomenon wasn't from humans, and was extraordinary.
We wouldn't even be having the conversation with the military if they had their druthers; if UFOs hadn't been showing up again and doing the same kinds of things they did in the '40s and '50s and fighter pilots weren't posting about their experiences on the internet, and Elizondo even Tom DeLong and others including a lot of people in high places in the government weren't working with Congress to have the reports and the hearing. And even Congress got to see better video than was released at the public hearing, though they were doubtlessly shown similar stuff. Scott Bray expected everyone to see an object whizzing by and expected to move on in the hearing, with no close-up still of that footage intended to be shown (he had to back up and go forward with the video), it was ridiculous.
They themselves admit they have better evidence from multiple sensors and those items are classified. They (the military) often use the excuse that revealing those images and footage to the public would compromise our secret sensors and intelligence infrastructure, blah, blah.. But that is ridiculous. It would be completely possible for them to show a series of images of the objects recorded and black out everything (stars, etc.) There is no reason they couldn't do this. They don't likely have any revolutionary secret sensor technology that is not conventional and known to our enemies, and even if they did, the evidence could be blacked out and the images shown. Don't they want help identifying these things? Why not show the public?
They have even changed the name of the UFO to "UAP", though the term does have a history, and now we have the new mouth-injuring acronym for the new UFO office: "AOIMSG"... Subtle PSYOPs.
Where is the Air Force? They are not voluntarily helping. Why not? It is a conversation they would have to be forced to have. If one looks at the old photos and footage, and I believe that those who have not seen UFOs should consider that if the phenomenon is real, then some of those old photographs and accounts are likely real, too. So, what could one expect from footage or recorded evidence that they might have? Same kind of thing --objects, saucers, cigars and spheres hovering nearby or maneuvering around aircraft, flying unshakably off of wing tips, and then shooting off at insane speeds with no sonic boom. Just as in the old articles. Objects near nuclear installations that can be seen from one vantage point but not another, that shoot off into space. Objects coming out of the water with a mist around them and then flying off over the land. Just as in the.... Old articles.. <skip..> Old Articles <skip..> Old articles <skip>..
Hopefully more will come out for everyone.
I think people probably have a right to know about this above and beyond national security reasons, politics, countries. It is a fundamental existential question for us: Are we alone? And perhaps you have a right to be part of a new understanding before you kick the bucket. In the end, it is really up to the phenomenon. With my experiences, even if the government never admits what is happening or releases real evidence, it isn't going to change my view on the subject. Hopefully more military folks will come out and discuss their experiences, or good footage will be leaked.
 
Last edited:

nivek

As Above So Below
Then there's this...

China launched the world's first AI-operated 'mother ship,' an unmanned carrier capable of launching dozens of drones.

 

nivek

As Above So Below
NASA to Set Up Independent Study on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena

NASA is commissioning a study team to start early in the fall to examine unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) – that is, observations of events in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena – from a scientific perspective. The study will focus on identifying available data, how best to collect future data, and how NASA can use that data to move the scientific understanding of UAPs forward.

The limited number of observations of UAPs currently makes it difficult to draw scientific conclusions about the nature of such events. Unidentified phenomena in the atmosphere are of interest for both national security and air safety. Establishing which events are natural provides a key first step to identifying or mitigating such phenomena, which aligns with one of NASA’s goals to ensure the safety of aircraft. There is no evidence UAPs are extra-terrestrial in origin.

“NASA believes that the tools of scientific discovery are powerful and apply here also,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, the associate administrator for science at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “We have access to a broad range of observations of Earth from space – and that is the lifeblood of scientific inquiry. We have the tools and team who can help us improve our understanding of the unknown. That’s the very definition of what science is. That’s what we do.”

The agency is not part of the Department of Defense’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force or its successor, the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group. NASA has, however, coordinated widely across the government regarding how to apply the tools of science to shed light on the nature and origin of unidentified aerial phenomena.

The agency’s independent study team will be led by astrophysicist David Spergel, who is president of the Simons Foundation in New York City, and previously the chair of the astrophysics department at Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. Daniel Evans, the assistant deputy associate administrator for research at NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, will serve as the NASA official responsible for orchestrating the study.

“Given the paucity of observations, our first task is simply to gather the most robust set of data that we can,” said Spergel. “We will be identifying what data – from civilians, government, non-profits, companies – exists, what else we should try to collect, and how to best analyze it.”

The study is expected to take about nine months to complete. It will secure the counsel of experts in the scientific, aeronautics, and data analytics communities to focus on how best to collect new data and improve observations of UAPs.


(More on the link)

.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
'Their presence alone is a serious national security issue': DOZENS of sailors confirm their warships were swarmed by 'at least 100' otherworldly UFOs and CONTRADICT Navy's effort to dismiss them as drones

Screenshot_20220627-214525.jpg

Naval crew have told documentary maker Jeremy Corbell that US warships were swarmed in 2019 by 'at least 100' UFOs with unexplainable capabilities. Last year Corbell published videos from the warship incidents that set social media ablaze. The videos were verified by the Pentagon and showed flashing objects hovering above US Navy ships in the Pacific Ocean. In an historic hearing on UFOs last month, Navy chiefs tried to explain away the incident, saying they were 'reasonably confident' the objects were drones. Corbell is now hitting back, claiming that he has 'dozens' of accounts from crew, investigators and briefed officials who say that the UFOs were other worldly. The nature and origin of the craft are still unknown, and witnesses say that they flew in ways that would put publicly-known drone technology to shame. A crewman with direct knowledge of the case, who spoke to DailyMail.com on condition of anonymity, called the incident 'world-changing'.

.
 
Top