Mystery of the Gatwick Unidentified Aerial Drones (UAD)

nivek

As Above So Below
Mystery of the Unidentified Aerial Drones (UAD) at Gatwick

What can we assume so far without concluding?

Due to the absence of a publicly released official report we are left with confusion and severely contrasting official information.

1) We can possibly assume the drone(s) were more than one, although can not verify this or if they occurred over Gatwick at the same time.

2) We cannot verify that the drones were in fact drones (civilian or military) due to the absence of both official photos and videos, we also have not been allowed access to the 67 civilian reports.

3) Somehow theses objects evaded the police and army. They somehow were not tracked back to the source of origin. Attempts to bring them down failed.

4) The flight times potentially were anything between 18-24 hours, exceeding the average civilian drone time of 25-30 minutes.

The potential for advanced military tech or even UAP must not be overlooked.

The strangest part throughout his whole case has been the lack of communication, in some cases very serious misinformation. Police aren’t talking amongst themselves with whatever other agencies have been involved (which they have).

We are again left asking very serious questions, again, why have we no access to the drones descriptions given from the 67 reports?

Where is the official video footage? (only amateur footage is available), are we really been asked to believe over 3 days that no video evidence of the drones was captured. Ridiculous. In a post 9/11 world are we expected to think no drones were recorded, that not one of the hundreds of sightings via the 67 reports across 3 days shows anything?

Why is this accepted as normal by all mainstream media institutions?

Why in some of the amateur footage do we see images of objects which do not look like usual commercial drones?

A video shown in the UK mirror tabloid shows a captured video of a disc looking object above the airport. However unless we receive descriptions of ‘silver discs’ from within the 67 reports this means little.

Will we get to see these reports? Is that a valid question to ask?

8D367816-368C-4B2F-BD3A-6308391F4580.jpeg

9E67A8B7-A84F-4469-9C83-12813A0AD572.jpeg


What we should be hearing and seeing from the reports are of your typical ‘drone’ descriptions.

23AC2E3E-A181-4ABB-B8C7-8AB261D4B178-300x148.jpeg


The above picture of a typical drone should have been available in abundance, and yet we haven’t seen or heard of anything so far.

The couple who were arrested for the drone charge, a middle aged hard working man and women, it turns out had nothing at all to do with the crime. They were released without charge. A lot of people saw it coming.

The police issued a statement saying that they have found a damaged drone on the outskirts of the airport field almost straight after the admission that they blundered the names of inncocent people to the UK tabloids. Again, no real details were presented, only that forensics is being used to analyse the drone.

After that, (and this is where we get confused), we have the piece saying that there may be no drones at all. Amazing. It turns out the police are saying they do not have any video footage of the drones being at the airport at all. Which of course is bizarre. A reported 50+ sightings (up to this point) over the 3 days, 2 unofficial videos, and the airport captures no video footage? To now claim that there maybe no drones at all after they try to charge an innocent couple is beyond negligible.

(More on the link)

.
 

humanoidlord

ce3 researcher
hmmm, sorry but that white disc is clearly a reflection of the indoor lights of the airport, there was another video floating around of a fast flying light wich looked much more convincing
 

Jr35rain

Adept
hmmm, sorry but that white disc is clearly a reflection of the indoor lights of the airport, there was another video floating around of a fast flying light wich looked much more convincing

Sorry mate strike out on this one, no reflection in that photo and the fast flying light has ben debunked.
 

wwkirk

Divine
The UK Mirror, the source of the still shots, is a tabloid, which are sensationalist and unreliable. Is there another source verifying that there really were drones above the airport?
 

Captain Tinkle

Honorable
I would not be surprised if it wasn't a drone after all.

Brexit is probably to blame as it is for everything else! :laugh8:

Work with someone who got delayed due to the "drone" sightings. Cost him £800 + to rebook a new flight from Heathrow instead. I am sure this whole event cost the travel insurance companies a fortune.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
Dubious about the 18 hours.

That is about the maximum for an aircraft. Helicopters have a maximum up time of a couple of hours.

Given that the hovering drones are only good for minutes, not a day or so, it would be nice to have evidence of the duration.
 
Top