Firstly, obviously people DIED there. I never said or implied otherwise. Stressing that people died there is a very common and sleazy method to derail from the FACT that "planes" were CGI and that it was obviously 1000% an inside job (just like
Operation Northwoods).
Your unnamed "friends and acquaintances" who supposedly "saw" a plane. "thousands of witnesses" WHAT thousands, NO ONE saw a plane, no one claimed to have seen a plane but a handful of bad actors (obviously underpaid).
On the other hand
we have many credible on-site witnesses, reporters, civilians, EVERYONE WITHOUT EXCEPTION said "it just exploded", no planes at all, not even a sound of plane incoming, nothing, nada, zilch (more on sound faking in a second).
David Handschuh, who photographed the explosion of the second tower while standing directly below and looking up at the tower on the side where the supposed "plane" hit, did not see any plane.
And right after reporter Don Dahler who was also there, first said
"I didn't see the plane go in, it just exploded", then an hour later changed the story to "we witnessed the plane go in".
Here are the testimonies.....
Reporter Jennifer Oberstein who was on site and surely talked to many people there, neither she or anyone saw any plane.
"We have no talk of a plane"
Moreover, Ace Baker absolutely proved in his great documentary that "planes" were CGI.
Puff ball, what should be an explosion of the engines,
in the Hezarkhani video the puff ball is visible under the left wing, as it should be, but in the Fairbanks video it is far above the wing. The red line covers the left wing exactly, it's crystal clear, it's a misplaced mask, they released that CGI montage later the same day, it was done in a hurry, so mistakes happened.
There are only
3 live recordings of the alleged "plane", all 3 have an interesting string of matches, if just ONE of those was not satisfied the fake plane would've been impossible.
A must-watch, 911 Pentagon first responder Adam Eisenberg.....
"In my 240 hours on site,
I never once saw anything that looked like a plane part. I never once saw anything that looked like an individual that had died on a plane. I didn't see any personal effects that looked like luggage. Every single thing that we saw—everybody that we saw—was somebody that was killed inside the Pentagon."
April Gallop survived the Pentagon,
she saw no sign of any plane as soon as she crawled out immediately after the detonation.
Not to mention that it is unrealistic that a Boeing 767 can even reach 510 knots aka 940km/h at an altitude of 300m due to the choking effect, because the air is too thick, and if it were to reach that speed in a dive the plane would fall apart immediately.
Not only would it fall apart at that speed, according to Boeing's own specifications, but at 360 to 420 knots at an altitude of 1000 feet, i.e. 300m, the wings on the 767 fall off.
WTC 1, 2 and 7, all three buildings fell in a literal free fall typical of controlled demolition. First responders and witnesses
all reported secondary explosions and many of them describe a
sequence typical of controlled demolition....
911-explosions
odysee.com
It is crystal clear that the explosions are occurring far below the collapsing peak, which no amount of compressed air can explain so many floors below.
None of the 4 alleged black boxes were found at the WTC, but important that they "found" the "terrorists'"
paper passports and a Bible fused with steel opened to the page that reads "Eye for an eye" and "Turn the other cheek".
When footage of the "plane" was stabilized the cgi plane became more jittery, which is impossible, unless it is cgi which it is, and it follows the shaking of the camera.
View: https://youtu.be/UmcOEY2cfi8?t=9790
It is not Interlacing jitter, Interlacing jitter on an object moving at a constant speed like the alleged "plane" before impact would almost certainly produce more regular jitter, and more constant frequency and amplitude. The CGI plane follows the camera shaking.
The satanic ritual, "reading lesson Pet Goat", Bush "informed" that a "plane" had hit the WTC and that "America is under attack", and yet he sat there for almost 7 minutes reading Pet Goat, the 60th story in the book. To make it a total circus
he later said that before entering the classroom he saw on TV the first plane hit altho first "plane" was not broadcasted until the next day.
The children say "kit steal playing must" but it is crystal clear heard as it's meant to be heard
"
hit steel plane must"
and immediately after they all bend down (to Baphomet, Pet Goat) to pick up the book, a very obvious ritual worship of Satan, and open lesson 60. on page 153, 6 and 9.
They read from Reading Mastery: Rainbow Edition, Level 2, Storybook 1. The story ends with the words "more to come", 22 minutes after that the alleged plane hits the Pentagon, i.e. detonation.
In the live broadcasts, they used badly edited cgi composites with a lot of glitches, contradictory perspectives, in identical shots that were shown later the same day, the background was completely removed, the trajectory of the "plane" was contradictory between the shots, the colors of the skyline were painted red like in the movies, although it was a normal day, the sky was normal blue.
September Clues by Simon Shack
September Clues Addendum
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/CxHlhHbys12x
21:25 into the documentary. Same perspective, yet “plane” comes in from almost 45° different angle and very different altitude + backdrop is gone.
ABC, CBS, FOX, CNN, NBC....they were all synchronized in the hoax, identical beeps, then a 17 second countdown to the supposed "plane crash" and then fade to black and an identical snap audio clip. The entire live TV broadcast on supposedly different TV channels was probably done from one control center and just streamed to different channels.
They used the identical audio clip of the woman's scream "God" in the TV broadcast of one footage of the alleged plane crash, and in the later "amateur" footage of Tina Cart.
CGI shots of Fairbanks and Hezarkhani,
fake soundtracks. When the Fairbanks footage was first shown there was no sound, Fairbanks first blamed the FBI for removing the sound, then later said that he accidentally turned off the microphone because he was using that camera for the first time, and then on the In Memoriam DVD Fairbanks footage appeared with sound effects, then Hezarkhani CGI footage, when CNN first published that footage on the evening of 9/11. screams are heard but there is no speech, while on the America Remembers DVD a male voice "Omg, a plane just crashed into the building. I cannot believe it" appears on the supposedly same sound recording. Etc.
They didn't even try for the slightest bit of coherence, just mocking the masses.
By the way, Fairbanks and a number of authors of "amateur" footage were
professionals from the photo/video/newsmedia industry, Evan Fairbanks was from KSK STUDIOS who worked on "Creative programming solutions for television, interactive and multimedia".
LUC COURCHESNE a Canadian 3D artist
CLIFTON CLOUD of 'Scharff Weisberg' audio-video services
SCOTT MYERS video/software engineer for ABC TV - US Navy
NAKA NATHANIEL New York Times multimedia journalist
DEVIN CLARK motion graphics animator at MTV / Comedy Central
SEAN ADAIR Adair film & video productions "Consultant in the arcane arts of digital media and visual effects."
KELLY GUENTHER Pulitzer-winning NYT photojournalist
ROBERT CLARK National Geographic photographer
JENNIFER SPELL director/producer 'SPELLBOUND pictures'
GULNARA SAMOILOVA Associated Press photo retoucher
THOMAS NILSSON photojournalist for Norwegian populist tabloid 'Verdens Gang'
Etc. It's a shameless and clunky inside job, with poorly animated cgi planes, cheap amateur actors and just overall done very poorly for a hoax they planned for more than 30 years.
aicCEZk/
), etc, for no gain.
