Yes there is - a laser is one example. And EMP weapon would be another. But there are plenty of other reasonsw to conclude that Corso was hoaxing the public with his crazy story.So basically this witness testimony inadvertently once more confirms what Col. Corzo was saying that "electromagnetic weapons" can bring UFO down. Those who know a little bit more physics than Col. Corzo does, would know that there is no such a thing as an "electromagnetic weapon"
That sounds plausible, but it's still a Hail Mary. Until we can produce significant gravitational field effects technologically, we won't actually know how it's done.Because UFOs create warp drives by pumping UFO's hulls with EM waves, tracking radar's beam creates phase shift or 'noise' that throws UFO's original EM field out of balance.
Col. Corso's entire testimony should be dismissed for both a lack of supporting evidence, as well as an abundance of contrary evidence (the well-known history of the materials that he claimed to be reverse-engineered from recovered alien technology, for example). And Steven Greer is about as credible as the town drunk - the "Mothra" debacle was particularly hilarious: Steven GreerB
So, here we have a triple lineup of tracking radar beam shooting UFOs: Col Corzo + Sailor witness + Dr. Greer.
When did that become a fact? The radar hypothesis is only that - a hypothesis.The fact that it is possible to shoot down UFOs with strong radar beams gives us all-important quantitative information.
You're piling one supposition upon another, to arrive at a dubious conclusion.The EM field that UFOs pump into their own hulls to create warp drives is on the same order of magnitude as our own radar beams. That strongly contributes to the idea that UFOs can be man-made since energy levels are quite manageable by ourselves.
That's a big caveat. We still don't even have a viable theoretical model for producing a material with gravitational field propulsion capabilities, and such a material could be far beyond terrestrial manufacturing capabilities. We just don't know either way.Obviously, the caveat is that we would need to be able to make the very special metamaterial for the hull.
I'm inclined to agree, but remain open-minded. It seems to me that the technology of AAVs could involve some method of manipulating the nuclear strong force in some manner, perhaps via some kind of quasiparticle that allows coupling between EM or acoustical waves or both, because the kinds of energy scales and forces required to produce GR effects are closer to the kinds of energies and forces that we find in nuclear physics than they are with any other physics that we know about.Whole UFO hull pumped with EM energy more and more "smells" of NMR resonance.
That makes no sense to me because I'm seeing a range of colors from yellow to orange to red in those photos.View attachment 12395
1981 Tepoztlan in Mexico by Carlos Diaz
I know that you must be sick of me posting this same UFO photo by Carlos Diaz again and again, but that is a very rare example of how the UFO hull is pumped by monochromatic laser light to create warp drive. The whole series of photos and videos was analyzed by a university in US and they concluded that light is monochromatic. Monochromatic means one and only one precise frequency.
And it seems clear that Carlos Diaz hoaxed those photos and his contact stories, just as Billy Meier did. So I give zero credence to any of his "evidence."
That's interesting stuff. I'll have to read that paper. As I understand it though, this concept still requires some negative energy in order to function, so I'm not yet convinced that this approach to gravitational field propulsion is physically realizable. If there's no such thing as negative energy, then it doesn't make much difference if you need 100 metric tons of it, or two grams of it.View attachment 12396
from paper ... https://indico.ict.inaf.it/event/751/contributions/5483/attachments/2655/5207/BobrickTorino2019.pdf
And this image above is what our own scientists, specialists in GR, think is an ideal shape for warp drive. For all practical purposes, our own scientists had solved GR only to find a solution that looks like UFO.