No, I don't agree with the data. It's fear mongering at its finest. You should read the articles I posted. It debunks the entire myth that some magical ice age is going to appear out of absoloutly nowhere. Also, no. We cannot predict solar minimums. Zharkova is the only person in the world who believes she is correct, every other reputable climate scientist in a nut shell is saying she is very intelligent and knows her field, but she is wrong.
I did read the articles that you posted. I have also read actual ICCP reports and much more on the topic.
what I posted has solid data from the past that matches the predictions that have been made with solid physics ideas. and from when it was posted the predictions have not changed, so they absolutely got this current solar min. accurate way before it happened.
I guess from your point of view the weather reporter is also a fear monger.
by your reply it seems like you did not read much of that site I linked to.
so,
let me sum it up for you.
when modeling the energy the sun puts out
you can look at it as gravitational pull of the planets on the sun (tides), or
you can also look at the sun as a generator, the sun is made of plasma (electrically conductive) and the planets are little magnets orbiting (yes, this makes an electric generator), so you calculate out angular momentum and can figure out how much energy the generator will be putting out.
either way the math works out the same.
and when you run the numbers, you get a match to solar activity, and that matches weather on earth through now proven paths like gamma rays creating clouds and they get through when the earth has less of a magnetic shield (that is driven by the energy from the sun)
this matches as far past as we have data.
so it is not like an ice age is going to happen out of no where, it happens out of disrupted solar cycles and the magnetic field of the planet mercury when it resolidifies from being melted by the sun magnetic reversals