My Alien Friends

Georgek

George
Presentation

The way that I was taught at university is that you do not have to be correct as long as you present your case in the best way that you can by gathering data and information to substantiate what you are putting across.

In other words you are told to research your points and as long as you had presented your points to add credence to your work, then taht is all that is required.

The same with mathematics. At the 'end of the day' it has nothing to do with arithmetic. People think that adding up is maths? It is not!
This is why we are given calculators at school...as we are allowed to cheat to get our answers.
With mathematics especially Pure Maths or Analytical Maths it is your formula that has to stand correct. Yet it does not have to be a certain formula. Analytical maths works in two ways. The two different approaches have got to give you the same answer. If it is the right answer then you have greater met your goal. This si why in engineering you do not have to be able to spell. We are told that we are engineers not English teachers. (Oh so you have noticed...lol)

(I was going to let you off at this stage...and another thing...lol)

With OTHER forums it is not the case. You are told to shut your mouth and not force your views across to others that they have the right to condemn you as it is your fault for not taking your case to the table correctly.

They simply cannot just cannot move on to more delectable discussions like :- 'My cat has got flue'

So eventually you are deemed as a trouble maker because you cannot accept that you are mad and need psychiatric help. That they do not REALLY hate you for discussing your unorthodox views that had struck a wrong chord with their religion, but instead they are trying to help you!

Oh my God....you write a story about aliens and instead of discussing the aliens they are talking about you and your brain...as they had become psychiatric doctors and have taken this task to help you out of your misery with their love. (what about my donation box..lol) What they are really saying is that &%##*@ has given my wife nightmares and has upset her church visits.

On With the Show

If you read the rep[ort of Frank Earp and his book:- "Paranormal Nottingham" on this forum prelude, there was an incident about 'The Six Movie Frames' which contained these aliens and their craft ect. as he had damaged the transparencies.

It was for this reason I kept asking for another miracle to happen.

It was round about October time, that I acquired an old cocoa tin and put a film inside, including paper and a pen. Wrapped the tin up and buried it at a strategic place near a standing stone.

I gave co-ordinates of the tins location by a small transmitter in the hope that my message would be intercepted by UFOs. When I unearthed the tin and developed the film, there was nothing there getting to Mid December 1975.

My next ploy was to try the other method how these 6 movie frames appeared on my film that took me ages to find.

I purchased a Topcon IC1 SLR camera and bought my first film a Kodacolor II 35mm 12 exp.

This time I made a note of every single picture that I had taken in the hope that something extra would appear. So I received the photos back from the processors and there was nothing strange...only the 12 pictures that I had taken. My first picture consisted of my Christmas cake with a card on top. (which I was baking)

A few years went by, and I could not understand why my UFO friends had not provided me with another picture? I thought I may have just missed it and studied the negatives very carefully and found this:-

D5_bwPtW0AACgJt.jpg
I did think straight away that this was what I had been waiting for without even looking at it. When I did...I was shocked. You may say that I was looking for something and that I found this which was nothing? Not the case!


D6BOUpKW4AAz4jF.jpg
D6BOUpJWkAEc4U-.jpg


People who had seen the picture automatically say that it is a pop group singing. They recon that the picture of the entity on the far right is holding a microphone and singing whilst the entities at the back are the backing group.

Fine!

The picture (my opinion) is all wrong and artificially embedded. The so called microphone he is holding is a probe that extends past the eyes. Okay...I agree he looks like Roy Orbison? Or perhaps Elvis Presley (hey don't knock the king!)

Analysing the Picture

1) For a start there was no pop group vaguely similar in 1975.
2) Their features are strange
3) The so called distortion is not so because there are only certain parts that look stretched. If let us say the flute noses are caused by movement, there would be a double image. There is not! The hand on the end figure is massive pulled outward. If you look at the middle figure, he has a right shoulder missing. The sliding doors are gaped back to the far right. The picture does not seem right
4) The reality of this is contained in the negative. When you look at their tunics or jackets they appear black. That is not the case because the black should appear white on the negative. Instead you have an absence of colour as this being neutral. All what is happening is that the figures are blocking the light passing through them as they are invisible...but it is only the incident light being blocked allowing them to be be cast as shadows. The heads are just glowing...that is why the centre figure has a shoulder missing.

5) If we study the negative further, we can see that only ONE colour (the blue) is allowed through. This being radiation.

6) You may think that this is a television picture which indeed is actually on the TV. BUT NOT by transmission!

The image radiation is projected on the surface outside from the living room. It took me ages to work that one out.

Try this for yourself....

Get a TV or CRT monitor and shine a torch on the screen. Turn out the light and you will see the glow.
It will not work on any other colour except white containing blue .

It is the same as a luminous watch. Also the cathode ray tube is concave on the outside. This image was projected at an angle to the TV and is distorting the hand at the edge by pulling the image outward.

If this was inside working outward then it would be focused by the CRT gun to be proportional.

So it is not a transmitted signal. Instead it was an image projected on the front of the screen similar to the way that a slide projector would do, but instead of a screen you have a curved TV screen bending inward.

George







 
Top