humanoidlord
ce3 researcher
what do you want more
UFO videos
- Thread starter humanoidlord
- Start date
- Copy link Copy link
Wraith Sheppard
Honorable
if you have nothing to say about a particular response, don't use "and", please. Instead try to come up with an argument.
Bullshit? Tell us why you think it is bullshit then.
humanoidlord
ce3 researcher
it looks smooth, waay too smooth, real life smooth
notdej
Honorable
you've become incredibly tedious now....
this will be my final attempt at being nice & trying to educate you:
youtube & type in the search <<MAYA BIOFROST>>
humanoidlord
ce3 researcher
funny who says that...
close but no cigar, the fluid movement isnt the only problem here: realistic video quality for 2004,that brief scene at the beggining of the city, very realistic static and more
Wraith Sheppard
Honorable
I understand what you mean; But listen, our minds can easily be tricked into believing into stuff while we look at different patterns. afaik; our eyes can only handle 60FPS and no more. If it was a CGI alien you'd think "ok, this is definitely fake. It's too slow for the eye and there are many details that differ it from an actual human being. Because when we move out lips, alot of muscles move at the same time, our facial expression changes, the skin on our face moves on all sorts of directions. On a cgi humanoid-alien you would notice that the movements are very unrealistic. "
BUT if you look at a "dripping" effect, you will have a hard time differing it from reality because the properties of that effect can easily be programmed. Parameters that it requires are "gravitation","speed","velocity"(,acceleration)... and ofc fps above 30.
notdej
Honorable
Sherlock== who says the 'effect' was added in 2004? think about it-- i'm still being nice btw
Wraith Sheppard
Honorable
That is a very poor argument.
Area201
cold fusion
My question remains: how are the Pentagon/team Delogne going to explain how they acquired exotic materials that allegedly came from one of these UABs/UFOs? This "UFO drip video" from 2004 (or one similar) may be one possible explanation - that it dropped it.
Something to keep in mind for future when Bigelow pops up again and opens the warehouse with materials for inspection.
While videos/photos are not going to prove anything, they can point to the proof. I think they have recovered both UFO ships and bodies long ago, this latest "ufo pentagon study" is an elaborate public attempt to get a small fraction of the secret out in a managed way to acclimate the public to the phenomenon.
The problem is not lack of hard evidence, it's lack of access to it and dis-info muddling the waters.
Something to keep in mind for future when Bigelow pops up again and opens the warehouse with materials for inspection.
While videos/photos are not going to prove anything, they can point to the proof. I think they have recovered both UFO ships and bodies long ago, this latest "ufo pentagon study" is an elaborate public attempt to get a small fraction of the secret out in a managed way to acclimate the public to the phenomenon.
The problem is not lack of hard evidence, it's lack of access to it and dis-info muddling the waters.
3FEL9
Islander
Lol,, 120 Hz screens.. for fools then ?
notdej
Honorable
sorry i'm still lost here all due respect:
are you suggesting if faked; the only way to fake it is by obtaining exotic materials & this is why in your opinion it can't be a fake?
Wraith Sheppard
Honorable
HHHHHHHHHHI just googled that up and they mention that, "seeing more frames than average" is possible. an example is video games;
"the visual perception can be trained. , and action games are particularly good at training vision. "
... but again I don't know alot on this field, and what i've found so far is not enough to continue this debate on how many frames eyes can handle per second.How many frames per second can the human eye really see? | PC Gamer
What is BLOCH'S LAW? definition of BLOCH'S LAW (Psychology Dictionary)
Area201
cold fusion
sorry i'm still lost here all due respect:
are you suggesting if faked; the only way to fake it is by obtaining exotic materials & this is why in your opinion it can't be a fake?
I'm not sure either way if the LA police ufo drip video is fake or not.
I suspect Pentagon/Delogne will argue one of these UFOs dropped/dripped the exotic material they have, and maybe a video to accompany that assertion. Alzondo says they have dozens of videos yet to be released he's seen.
Again, I'm not sure if that video is fake or real, I'm going to need to look further into it. Right now keeping it as reference and not dismissing it entirely as CGI as you have instantly.
Goes both ways, you are confusing me as well with some of your replies.
notdej
Honorable
you didn't answer the question
3FEL9
Islander
I just googled that up and they mention that, "seeing more frames than average" is possible. an example is video games;
"the visual perception can be trained. , and action games are particularly good at training vision. "
How many frames per second can the human eye really see? | PC Gamer
What is BLOCH'S LAW? definition of BLOCH'S LAW (Psychology Dictionary)
Well, I can tell ya, that I see a real diff. Between 24 fps (movies) and the 100 fps setting (dsp magic lol) when watching Blue Ray discs on my PS.. Think my "TV" projects something like 200 Hz ( it says so ) , not sure it actually does..
Last edited:
notdej
Honorable
so what do you think it is then?
August
Metanoia
Its not a chinese lantern . It could be a UFO dripping something.
notdej
Honorable
so you feel it could be alien in origin? if not then emphasize - you don't have to of course; just for discussion sake.
as you've probably gathered: i believe it to be cgi for the reasons i've put forward-- what do you think?