UFOs: skeptics, disclosure, and contact

The Apollo 16 material in the third release was a big nothingburger. In one recording they saw an unexplained flash on the lunar surface from orbit, in the other they joked about an 'alien starbase or something'. The release tells you exactly where those statements are in the file. The third is the same old interview Walter Cronkite did with Gordon Cooper.

Why those were classified is a mystery. Hence the overclassification of the mundane.
 

nivek said:

I found alien DNA hidden in human genes: Inside a scientist's hunt for extraterrestrial hybrids as CIA is accused of secretly tracking them​

Americans may no longer need to look to the stars for signs of alien life - the clues may already be written into our DNA, according to a geneticist. Dr Max Rempel is leading efforts to test the theory that alien DNA has been deliberately introduced into the human gene pool. The controversial scientist last year claimed to have found 11 families around the world who carried large chunks of DNA that cannot be traced back to anyone - or anything - on Earth.

The molecular geneticist, from the DNA Resonance Research Foundation in San Diego, made the purported discovery in an analysis of 23andMe data.

He found clusters of genetic fragments that appeared unnatural, almost like they had been added or injected into the person's genome. As the subjects were born before 1990, this ruled out human gene-editing technology, which only emerged in 2013. Rempel has theorized that the anomalies may be linked to alien interference. 'I assume all of us are ancient alien hybrids; there's no human who isn't, 100 percent, without exception,' he said.

Now, he is launching a wider study that will include people who claim to have had alien abduction experiences. There are, of course, major concerns with all of his theories. The initial study wasn't peer reviewed, and most scientists dispute the findings and say there are other, less radical reasons for genetic anomalies.

Still, the idea is tantalizing. And the timing could hardly be better. With President Donald Trump promising to release thousands more UFO files, belief in extraterrestrial life is now mainstream. YouGov polling shows 47 percent of Americans believe alien life has definitely or probably visited Earth at some point. And an even greater 65 percent of Americans say intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe.

Alien fever is also dominating popular culture. Steven Spielberg's upcoming alien blockbuster, Disclosure Day, is already being tipped as one of the year's biggest releases, while Ryan Gosling's Project Hail Mary is the third-highest-grossing movie of 2026, a film about an astronaut who saves humanity with the help of an alien companion. Hoping to bring his own work out of the realm of science fiction and into hard science, Rempel is launching a new phase of testing using cutting-edge genetic analysis that goes far beyond what is available through consumer DNA services such as 23andMe and Ancestry.com.

The new project, known as Starseed Genetics, which is gathering funding to do in-depth genetic testing, will conduct long-read DNA sequencing, a process that can read a person's entire DNA code with very high accuracy. According to Rempel, the 'smoking gun' of alien manipulation will be finding signs of non-parental DNA insertions - or genetic segments not present in either parent.

This would go against standard biology, as children get their DNA only from their parents. Even one clear case would be huge, though Rempel noted it would not automatically prove the source was alien. It could be some new biological process humans were not aware of yet. To confirm those DNA tests, it will take a comparison study of about 50 'abductee' families versus 100 random families.

Higher rates of unusual DNA in people who claim to be abductees would support the theory that alien-human hybrids exist, he says. 'If we find alien DNA in a human chromosome, that is hard physical evidence of alien manipulation of human DNA. That kind of proof moves disclosure forward and brings open contact closer,' he added in a statement on the Starseed website.

The new project has already lined up a pool of candidates, including families with well-documented histories of UFO contact, alleged encounters with extraterrestrials and memories of abductions. In May 2025, Rempel revealed that an examination of 581 complete families from the 1,000 Genomes Project, a global sample, found DNA in 11 families that did not match the genetic makeup of either parent. Rempel told the Daily Mail that the study analyzed DNA from both ordinary people and self-reported alien abductees.

However, the scientist cautioned that the original DNA samples used in the study came from an older collection that included cultured cells exposed to viruses, making the results unreliable and potentially filled with errors.

Still, the initial results were provocative.

Rempel's work often overlaps with fringe UFO conspiracy theories, including claims the CIA is secretly combing through consumer DNA databases in search of evidence of extraterrestrial ancestry. One of the most prominent advocates of the theory is former Army intelligence sergeant Lyn Buchanan, who participated in the U.S. government's controversial Cold War-era remote-viewing program.

The project explored whether individuals could gather intelligence through alleged psychic abilities, but government reviews later concluded it lacked scientific reliability and produced little practical intelligence value, leading to its closure in the 1990s. Buchanan has claimed that the CIA has 'secret backdoors' into commercial genetic databases, allowing officials to search millions of DNA profiles for people carrying what he believes to be extraterrestrial genetic markers.

He alleges the agency is particularly interested in identifying descendants of the so-called 'Nordics' - a race of aliens from UFO lore said to resemble exceptionally tall Scandinavians with blond hair, blue eyes and fair skin. Of course, Buchanan has not publicly provided evidence supporting the existence of such a program, nor has he produced evidence that alien-human hybrids exist.

Ancestry strongly rejected suggestions that intelligence agencies can freely access its database.

A spokesperson said: 'Law enforcement – or anyone working on their behalf – is not permitted to use Ancestry for investigative genetic genealogy. We disclose customer information to law enforcement only when required by valid legal process, such as a court order, and we are transparent about these practices.'

.
Click to expand...

Well, most folks who know me would say I came from Uranus...
 
The Epstein Connection to UFO Disclosure | Matt Ehret:



Matthew J.L. Ehret brings up some really big red flags, warning that the modern UFO disclosure story is not a clean truth campaign, and pointing out that some of the same intelligence and political figures tied to secrecy, surveillance and official narratives are now positioned around disclosure, specifically listing Hillary Clinton's 1990s UFO push, John Podesta, Lawrence Rockefeller and James Clapper among them. Ehret highlights the strange way the subject moved into mainstream politics after the Snowden era.

The most surprising thread is Jeffrey Epstein's interest in UFOs, free energy, physicists, and advanced science. Ehret does not frame Epstein as a random outsider who happened to like strange topics. He treats Epstein's network as connected to elite scientific circles and black-budget curiosity, which raises a different questions: who wanted access to hidden physics, why would UFO disclosure be part of that world and why would someone like Epstein care about UFOs at all?

Ehret wisely lays out the startling swift creation and development of secret science programs right after World War II, bringing their connection to Plasma Physics, forbidden aeronautics, the Manhattan Project, the Department of Energy, MK Ultra, and other programs that sit outside normal public accountability, while entire branches of science were being increasingly compartmentalized, militarized, and hidden behind national security.

While keeping up with the Snowden connection timeline, Ehret points to the irony of figures associated with mass surveillance and intelligence failures becoming voices around truth and transparency. If the same institutions that built secrecy are now offering disclosure, what exactly are they disclosing, and what are they still withholding?

What the current UFO disclosure story might be covering? Ehret expands on how the release of information about technologies hidden for decades would be a geopolitical weapon, especially in a world moving towards conflict with Russia and China.

Matt Ehret also sums up the decisive aspects of how a network involving financiers, scientists, intelligence figures and elite political operators -- which comprise the public face of a much older hidden-science system -- end up turning the UFO discussion into a question of power and control.

Full episode:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VydV9b_sn5o


P..S.:
Matthew J.L. Ehret is a journalist, lecturer and founder of the Canadian Patriot Review (www.canadianpatriot.org). His works have been published in Executive Intelligence Review, Global Times, Asia Times, 21st Century Science and Technology, Los Angeles Review of Books, The Duran, Zero Hedge, Fort-Russ and Sott. He has published "The Time has Come for Canada to Join the New Silk Road" and is the author of three volumes of the Untold History of Canada (vol 2: In Defence of Manifest Destiny, vol 3: The Forgotten Struggle for Progress and vol 4: Caught Between Two Worlds). The Untold History series and some of his history lectures are available on untoldhistory.canadianpatriot.org/
 
Unlike most government agencies the DoE has existed for decades under multiple names and has it's own classification system/access That alone says a lot - I'm not sure what it is but it's something. One thing I am certain of is that they can release all the tranches they want and it isn't going to add up to much more than we've already seen, whatever 'it' is that isn't it. Agreed there is an attempt at distraction and that's probably part of it.

I'm not one to stitch many weird things into some sort of quilt, that's all too common in ufology. I'm sure it got him many 'likes' which is the overriding point of being on YT but how well that actually serves the interest is debatable.
 
pigfarmer said:
I'm not one to stitch many weird things into some sort of quilt, that's all too common in ufology. I'm sure it got him many 'likes' which is the overriding point of being on YT but how well that actually serves the interest is debatable.
Click to expand...

Well, good point , because that's the hard part of the job the sadly less and less serious researchers (on whatever subject besides ufology) more and more have to grapple with on social medias like YouTube. Maybe not so much on Rumble? I don't know.
 
rick robson said:
Maybe not so much on Rumble?
Click to expand...
I don't even now what that is :)

I'm 62 and have been interested in this my entire life. Surprisingly, things really haven't changed all that much. True we have all sorts of video and pictures now but today they're even more debatable than film was, plus human nature hasn't changed one bit. Social media just gives it a platform and amplifies it. All the distraction takes away from genuine events and despite my overall well earned skepticism I know there are many very real events that can't be easily dismissed.

I've gone on at length here @AE about the '80s 'Hudson Valley NY Wave' because that's where I live. The story is a deliberate fabrication that just refuses to die and various UFO 'celebrities' keep it alive for their own purposes that are more about themselves than anything else. This leads to online debate and has a whole group of believers that just don't want to hear any of that and will argue the point to death - even with a man who lives here and actually witnessed the damned things. I found newspaper articles and found that among all the BS there were a couple of truly weird cases that were ignored as a result.
 
pigfarmer said:
I don't even now what that is :)

I'm 62 and have been interested in this my entire life. Surprisingly, things really haven't changed all that much. True we have all sorts of video and pictures now but today they're even more debatable than film was, plus human nature hasn't changed one bit. Social media just gives it a platform and amplifies it. All the distraction takes away from genuine events and despite my overall well earned skepticism I know there are many very real events that can't be easily dismissed.

I've gone on at length here @AE about the '80s 'Hudson Valley NY Wave' because that's where I live. The story is a deliberate fabrication that just refuses to die and various UFO 'celebrities' keep it alive for their own purposes that are more about themselves than anything else. This leads to online debate and has a whole group of believers that just don't want to hear any of that and will argue the point to death - even with a man who lives here and actually witnessed the damned things. I found newspaper articles and found that among all the BS there were a couple of truly weird cases that were ignored as a result.
Click to expand...

100%, friend. I really don't think we are any different, and certainly not better, than any previous generation. Quite often I find that something written 1500 years ago tells me more about the time I live in than something written yesterday, and certainly more than the ugly circus that passes for "news" these days.
 
pigfarmer said:
I don't even now what that is :)

I'm 62 and have been interested in this my entire life. Surprisingly, things really haven't changed all that much. True we have all sorts of video and pictures now but today they're even more debatable than film was, plus human nature hasn't changed one bit. Social media just gives it a platform and amplifies it. All the distraction takes away from genuine events and despite my overall well earned skepticism I know there are many very real events that can't be easily dismissed.

I've gone on at length here @AE about the '80s 'Hudson Valley NY Wave' because that's where I live. The story is a deliberate fabrication that just refuses to die and various UFO 'celebrities' keep it alive for their own purposes that are more about themselves than anything else. This leads to online debate and has a whole group of believers that just don't want to hear any of that and will argue the point to death - even with a man who lives here and actually witnessed the damned things. I found newspaper articles and found that among all the BS there were a couple of truly weird cases that were ignored as a result.
Click to expand...
Yeah your point about the social media outlets is spot on, and I'd even say it so clearly reflects the state of our societies, it's the most recent proof that values and goals of any society can be accurately described by just glancing at the ultimate purposes their technological developments are applied for. No wonder why Arts and science are deeply affected these days.
 
Last edited:
After this scientist looked at historical vanishing object in orbit, she found that these vanishing objects tend to arrive in greater number 1 day before nuclear tests 68% of time. It seems that UFOs know in advance when nuclear tests will happen? Go 27:11 if link doesn't take you to the exact spot where she said that..


View: https://youtu.be/D4jvdrN-FQw?t=1630

And yes, she said that there were few incidents where her safety was compromised by unknown actors.
 
Last edited:

NASA accused of erasing UFOs from photographs before public release​

A former NASA contractor with top-secret security clearance accused the US space agency of quietly removing evidence of alien life from photos before sharing them with the public.

Stunning allegations made by Donna Hare, who illustrated graphics for the agency, have resurfaced, alleging she was told that NASA photo lab technicians airbrush images of UFOs from satellite images.

Hare, who worked for NASA contractor Philco Ford Aerospace from 1967 to 1981, said she learned from a friend working in the photo lab that the space agency has had a plan in place to keep proof of extraterrestrial encounters hidden for decades.

She claimed in multiple interviews that in 1970 or 1971, while working in the restricted photo lab at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, a lab technician showed her an image depicting a round white object with sharply defined edges hovering above a field of pine trees.

Hare, who died in 2021, claimed she had never seen an object like this before and asked the NASA worker if it was a UFO, to which the photo lab tech replied: 'I can't tell you that.'

'I knew he meant was "it was" but he couldn't tell me so I said "what are you going to do with this information" and he said "well, we always have to airbrush them out before we sell them to the public,"' she said.

The claims resurfaced online this year after NASA took sharp criticism for the poor photography of interstellar space object 3i/ATLAS, which some in the scientific community suggested may have been a piece of alien technology passing Earth.

Both NASA and the US government have maintained that there has never been any proof that UFOs and alien life exist in the cosmos or have visited Earth.

(More on the link)

.
 
Anybody noticed the 4th tranche drop? Some pics are fairly unremarkable like the Space Shuttle images of what could be anything in orbit and others I haven't quite been able to get my head around.

Overall it does seem a lot of things got classified that maybe didn't need to be. Some interesting historical records in there.
 
Rick Hunter said:
We are only "discovering" what all people in every place and era of history already knew and accepted as plain fact.
Click to expand...



The Ancient Scriptures tell us in detail what the official Bible let out. Moreover, Diana Walsh Pasulka's extensive work lays out uncontestable evidence that many of it was historically misunderstood.
Pasulka is a professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina Wilmington who specializes in Catholic history and the intersection of religion, technology, and UFO beliefs. She is currently leading a translation project of Saint Joseph of Copertino's canonization records in cooperation with the Vatican Apostolic Archive.
 
This video reveals in very straightforward terms official doctrine for handling UFO investigations as conceived in 1948, and continued till today.

Back in 1948 US was unable to provide full radar coverage of its own territory, therefore most of UFO information was coming from civilians. But, central repository of UFO info was created and shared between all the different military and intelligence branches. As well, name of USAF general Twining comes up consistently, as he appears to be man in charge of UFO investigations.

Most importantly, video contains transcript of the long rumored conversation between Armstrong and Aldrin on Apollo 11 with NASA about object that looked like "open suitcase" which was following them.


View: https://youtu.be/IoVT-gX60lY
 
Last edited:

Scientists issue warning after spotting more than 20 giant UFOs racing across the moon​

Astronomers studying the moon claim to have captured possible evidence of a technologically advanced nonhuman civilization.

Scientists at Ukraine’s Main Astronomical Observatory reported observing more than 20 unidentified objects moving near and across the moon several months in 2025.

Some of the disc-shaped objects were estimated to measure between 15 and 25 miles across.

In a new study that has not been peer-reviewed, the team said they identified two categories of UFOs: ‘atmospheric’ objects that appeared stationary and ‘continental’ objects that appeared to move across the moon’s surface.

The objects also appeared to display unusual changes in brightness and rotation.

The researchers argued that those patterns could indicate structured, technological behavior, and raised the possibility that the objects originated from a hidden base on the moon.

'UFOs are observed on Earth and in near-Earth space. We believe that the moon serves as a base for UFOs,' the team shared in the study.

The researchers claimed the objects could reach Earth within 20 minutes and appear in the atmosphere as UAPs. They argued that the objects’ apparently intelligent behavior could point to the existence of a 'technologically advanced civilization.'

1785873642997.jpeg

While the scientists are sure the objects they observed were likely nonhuman craft, there is no scientific evidence of aliens or artificial structures on the moon.

Both NASA and the US government have long maintained that while some sightings remain unexplained, none has been confirmed to involve extraterrestrial technology.

Researchers recorded the main group of more than 20 unidentified objects during two observation periods on September 7, 2025, beginning at 7.05pm and 7.27pm ET.

They reported detecting additional ring-shaped objects during a separate observation on August 16, 2025, at 2.52am ET. Both sightings were captured using a high-speed camera attached to a telescope in Vinarivka, a village in Ukraine’s Kyiv region.

The high-speed camera snapped 20 images every second, allowing the scientists to track objects that would have otherwise been nearly impossible to see.

The UFOs were so faint that some appeared as nothing more than a two-by-two-pixel speck against the moon.

But the researchers claimed the objects were not behaving randomly.

Those labeled ‘atmospheric’ appeared to remain locked in place as they moved in sync with the moon, suggesting they were somehow anchored near its surface, the study noted.

The report added that the objects also emitted rapid flashes lasting between one-tenth and half a second, with their brightness rising and falling in repeating patterns that the team described as a pulsing process.

The study highlighted that two objects believed to be hundreds of miles apart appeared to flash in unison.

Researchers said the link was statistically significant, although the finding does not prove that the objects were communicating or controlled by intelligent beings.

The team then used the amount of light reflected by the UFOs to estimate their potential size.

Even under the assumption that they reflected 100 percent of the sunlight hitting them, the objects would have measured approximately 1,440 feet across.

If their surfaces reflected light in the same way as the Moon, however, they could have been more than one mile wide.

The scientists admitted that they did not know what the objects were made of or how reflective they were, meaning their true size remains uncertain.

1785873736642.jpeg

The most extraordinary objects were those the researchers called ‘continental’ UFOs, which appeared to race across the lunar surface.

One reportedly traveled nearly 14 miles at an astonishing 4.1 miles per second.

1785873767335.jpeg

Two others appeared to be massive discs measuring approximately 16 miles and 25 miles across, making the larger object nearly the length of Manhattan.

Their brightness also rose and fell at repeating frequencies, which the team isolated from atmospheric interference and telescope-tracking errors using specialized filtering software.

A separate observation on August 16, 2025 revealed something even stranger.

Several enormous ring-shaped objects appeared against the daytime sky, barely visible until scientists enhanced the footage with false colors.

The team claimed the dark objects did not appear to emit light and instead absorbed nearly all the radiation striking them.

They appeared to complete a full rotation every three minutes and were estimated to measure roughly 22 miles across while reaching speeds of 6.8 miles per second.

Based on their size and rotation, the researchers calculated that the rings could generate centrifugal force more than twice as powerful as Earth’s gravity, raising the possibility that they were producing their own artificial gravity.

However, the remarkable findings rest on the assumption that the faint shapes were genuine objects near the Moon rather than atmospheric distortions, camera artifacts or errors introduced during image processing.

The study has not been peer-reviewed, and its claims of giant, technologically advanced craft have not been independently confirmed.

.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top