When Giants Roamed the Earth

nivek

As Above So Below
Most people that have extreme height suffer from physical ailments.

That wasn't the case in the distant past, there was once a race of giants that were born giants with no physical aliments...

...
 

wwkirk

Divine
As Zeke said, there's apparently a cover-up to suppress knowledge of giants.
The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America: The Missing Skeletons and the Great Smithsonian Cover-Up
51qjQjhcUAL._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 

wwkirk

Divine
The following article is an extract from The Myth Of Man by J.P. Robinson.
The Glastonbury Giant
"When researching the reality of giants in the past, one story which has survived the ages is the apparent discovery of the ‘Glastonbury Giant’ which was allegedly unearthed in 1190, on orders of King Henry II, following rumours that the legendary King Arthur was in fact buried at that specific location. Here, between two ancient pyramid-shaped pillars at Glastonbury in Somerset, England, workers dug down to a depth of seven feet where they found a leaden cross with the inscription:

HIC JACET SEPULTUS INCLYTUS REX ARTURUS IN INSULA AVALLONI

"This translates as ‘Here lies buried the renowned King Arthur in the Isle of Avalon.’

"This discovery inspired the excavators to dig even further in the hope of finding solid proof of the legend’s existence, and at sixteen feet deep they finally struck a large coffin hollowed out from the trunk of an old oak tree. Inside they discovered the skeletal remains of a man who had once measured close to nine feet tall, laid next to the skeleton of an average-sized woman, assumed at that time to be Arthur’s Queen, Guinevere."
bdd04e_8c1f08d56d304d92a40834ff5cce4b41~mv2.jpg

Image: An Anglo-Saxon oak coffin dating back around 1,300 years discovered on a cemetery site called Great Ryburgh in Norfolk, eastern England. The Glastonbury Giant remains are likely from a similar time period.

Robinson argues that even if this is not the grave of King Arthur, it's evidence that there were giants.
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
The following article is an extract from The Myth Of Man by J.P. Robinson.
The Glastonbury Giant
"When researching the reality of giants in the past, one story which has survived the ages is the apparent discovery of the ‘Glastonbury Giant’ which was allegedly unearthed in 1190, on orders of King Henry II, following rumours that the legendary King Arthur was in fact buried at that specific location. Here, between two ancient pyramid-shaped pillars at Glastonbury in Somerset, England, workers dug down to a depth of seven feet where they found a leaden cross with the inscription:

HIC JACET SEPULTUS INCLYTUS REX ARTURUS IN INSULA AVALLONI

"This translates as ‘Here lies buried the renowned King Arthur in the Isle of Avalon.’

"This discovery inspired the excavators to dig even further in the hope of finding solid proof of the legend’s existence, and at sixteen feet deep they finally struck a large coffin hollowed out from the trunk of an old oak tree. Inside they discovered the skeletal remains of a man who had once measured close to nine feet tall, laid next to the skeleton of an average-sized woman, assumed at that time to be Arthur’s Queen, Guinevere."
bdd04e_8c1f08d56d304d92a40834ff5cce4b41~mv2.jpg

Image: An Anglo-Saxon oak coffin dating back around 1,300 years discovered on a cemetery site called Great Ryburgh in Norfolk, eastern England. The Glastonbury Giant remains are likely from a similar time period.

Robinson argues that even if this is not the grave of King Arthur, it's evidence that there were giants.

An interesting article......but how is this proof of a giant? The article doesn't mention a height. The coffin also appears to be made of separate planks.

There is very good evidence that the King Arthur myth is based on a real Roman-Briton who was a general/warlord from the 5th or 6th century.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
Well...

All this would be more convincing if I couldn't trace most of the "giant" photos back to Worth1000 photoshopping contests.

I'm willing to entertain the idea but need better evidence.

As far as the six finger thing - that is a recessive gene.

Much like the blue people of Ohio there was an isolated Siberian village where everyone had six fingers.

If you isolate a community long enough, odd traits express themselves because of lack of diversity.

Most over breed dogs have health problems.
 

Toroid

Founding Member
Well...

All this would be more convincing if I couldn't trace most of the "giant" photos back to Worth1000 photoshopping contests.

I'm willing to entertain the idea but need better evidence.

As far as the six finger thing - that is a recessive gene.

Much like the blue people of Ohio there was an isolated Siberian village where everyone had six fingers.

If you isolate a community long enough, odd traits express themselves because of lack of diversity.

Most over breed dogs have health problems.
Here's a Brazilian family with six fingers.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNkdF5A5Feg
 
Top