UFO videos



Let's see, birds are not big enough for radar signatures.
Swamp gas probably doesn't show either.
The planet Venus is too high for radar.
Weather Balloons don't fly into mountains, normally.
Not a psychotic break.
Probably not a Russian sputnik or a meteor, since it goes sideways.

Well, you are making it difficult for the skeptics to work with this material sir.
 

1963

Noble
I was going to post this video last week when I saw it on Twitter, but decided against because though it looks 'cool' , it's one of those familiar-looking probable CGI's that are pretty common nowadays and always created for publicity purposes. But what made me reconsider posting it for consideration is the fact that the Twitter user that supplied the film Los Angeles-based musician Leah Capelle [hence the publicity-grab notion] actually removed the video from her account after just a few days, which as this article suggests, ... Musician Deletes Footage of "UFO" Captured from Airplane Window — The Singular Fortean Society
would seem to go against the smart publicity ethos of 'greatest possible exposure' , and though i'm still far from being convinced that there is anything legitimate about the film clip, like many others on Twitter, I wondered ... "what gives?" ... why remove it so soon? ... it is as good as any other of this kind of 'click-bait' that hangs around gaining as much exposure as possible, so what do you think the reason to take it away is?

... here is a still of the "UFO" ...
UFO+Chicago+Musician.png


Cheers.
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
birds are not big enough for radar signatures.

https://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Bird_burst

bird burst
Radar echoes caused by flocks of roosting birds that take to the air as a group and fly away in different directions.

Bird bursts typically occur near sunrise and have ring-shaped reflectivity signatures with weak echoes in the center and maximum reflectivity in circles that expand with time around the roosting site. In Doppler radar observations, the velocity signature resembles that of a microburst at low levels.
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
I was going to post this video last week when I saw it on Twitter, but decided against because though it looks 'cool' , it's one of those familiar-looking probable CGI's that are pretty common nowadays and always created for publicity purposes. But what made me reconsider posting it for consideration is the fact that the Twitter user that supplied the film Los Angeles-based musician Leah Capelle [hence the publicity-grab notion] actually removed the video from her account after just a few days, which as this article suggests, ... Musician Deletes Footage of "UFO" Captured from Airplane Window — The Singular Fortean Society
would seem to go against the smart publicity ethos of 'greatest possible exposure' , and though i'm still far from being convinced that there is anything legitimate about the film clip, like many others on Twitter, I wondered ... "what gives?" ... why remove it so soon? ... it is as good as any other of this kind of 'click-bait' that hangs around gaining as much exposure as possible, so what do you think the reason to take it away is?

... here is a still of the "UFO" ...
UFO+Chicago+Musician.png


Cheers.


Agreed. It looks very cool but there's something that just seems a bit off. It moves the way a laser pointer dot moves when I am bothering the cats with it.
 

August

Metanoia
I was going to post this video last week when I saw it on Twitter, but decided against because though it looks 'cool' , it's one of those familiar-looking probable CGI's that are pretty common nowadays and always created for publicity purposes. But what made me reconsider posting it for consideration is the fact that the Twitter user that supplied the film Los Angeles-based musician Leah Capelle [hence the publicity-grab notion] actually removed the video from her account after just a few days, which as this article suggests, ... Musician Deletes Footage of "UFO" Captured from Airplane Window — The Singular Fortean Society
would seem to go against the smart publicity ethos of 'greatest possible exposure' , and though i'm still far from being convinced that there is anything legitimate about the film clip, like many others on Twitter, I wondered ... "what gives?" ... why remove it so soon? ... it is as good as any other of this kind of 'click-bait' that hangs around gaining as much exposure as possible, so what do you think the reason to take it away is?

... here is a still of the "UFO" ...
UFO+Chicago+Musician.png


Cheers.


Tic Tac UFO ?
 

nivek

As Above So Below
I know it's only audio but very interesting...

...

 
I know it's only audio but very interesting...

...



Well, the aircraft was over the four-corners area, which is the place that Native Americans explain is the meeting place for the thunderbirds and other sky gods. Nearing Albuquerque, and the Airbase there, but on a flight plan for Alamagorda perhaps. Many, many sightings, landings, and crashes near there.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
I know it's only audio but very interesting...

...



A follow-up, seems the FBI is investigating this incident...

 

nivek

As Above So Below
 




When Area 51 was acknowledged, and people began speaking of it, they moved operations to other locations. Standard procedure. Keep guarding the empty barn, but make sure the animals are elsewhere. One spot is called Fallan, Nevada, in the upper northwest of Nevada. Population not much, but yet they have a Naval Communications Station there and Cryptographers as well - I know this. So that location and one in Colorado near the four-corners area are the new Areas. Leaving there and heading SSW to hit the Baja peninsula, you would overfly the area in the photo. Baja leads to the underwater places.

So it could be one of our captured ones, or similar.
 

1963

Noble
Hi guys, just wondering if anyone had heard any more than me about the possible identity of the object in the ISS film below that was recorded from NASA livestream last February?



... though I first saw it via Scott Waring's site ... it still turned out that the provenance of the film was good.... it was indeed an untouched NASA film. ... Initially my thoughts were that it didn't seem to be any kind of NASA jetsam [blanket, packaging etc] .. and being as how NASA had allowed this [very intriguing] film to go public [and not even cut off the live-stream] I expected a prosaic explanation was pending. ... But nothing I saw from the commenters ever really convinced me that 'anyone' knew what it was ... and in fact the general consensus that it was the "Top Secret U.S Air Force X-37B Spy Vehicle" .. didn't really float my boat at the time?
PRI_75114158.jpg


... and then, unless I missed something? ... the whole episode of inquiry seemed to come to a premature 'fizzle-out'. ... So can anybody tell me just why this thing wasn't a bigger story on the UFO scene? ... Am I being a bit obtuse here? ... is it possible that 'the UFO' in the film is that 'spy-plane' in the picture? ... doesn't look like it to me. :Unsure:

Cheers.



 
Top