Moon Hoax

Toroid

Founding Member
During the 1972 Apollo 17 mission to the moon a reflection of a possible stagehand appears in visor of an astronaut.
'MOON HOAX' Does 'stagehand reflected in astronaut's' visor prove it was filmed in studio?
A conspiracy theory video uploaded to YouTube suggests a human figure not wearing a space suit has been captured on camera during the 1972 Apollo 17 landing.

Thousands of people have viewed the video uploaded by channel Streetcap1, which is entitled "Does Astronaut's visor reflection show a stagehand on the Apollo fake Moon set?"

The 48th anniversary of Neil Armstrong's first steps on the lunar surface took place in July, but many conspiracy theorists across the globe remain convinced it was the biggest cover up of all time.

Moon hoax conspiracy theorists say a desperate President John F Kennedy, who wanted to beat the Russians in the space race to the moon, ordered the production of a series of films in top-secret studios to make it look like NASA astronauts made it to the lunar surface.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=771BCym46JE
Published on Nov 16, 2017
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
:facepalm::ttm:.....thanks for the laugh.

What I find terribly amusing are the people who believe we've not been to the moon or in space at all because we don't have the ability are often the same people who say ETs are visiting earth because we are so advanced.....lol.
 

humanoidlord

ce3 researcher
humans have really gone to the moon, there is 0 proof showing otherwise
that video however is interesting, looks like something was watching the apollo guys
it doesnt help that his look matches the description of what people reported seen exiting from UFO'S from the 50's to 70's (after that the grey shits replaced everthing)
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
humans have really gone to the moon, there is 0 proof showing otherwise
that video however is interesting, looks like something was watching the apollo guys
it doesnt help that his look matches the description of what people reported seen exiting from UFO'S from the 50's to 70's (after that the grey shits replaced everthing)

I'd say its the back of the other astronaut.
 

dr wu

Noble
To me it looks like it could be a rock/ground or some other reflection anomaly that just happens to look like a person standing. Again,,, it's called pareidolia. Certainly no way clear enough to say that it's a person really standing there.
And why would a 'stagehand' simply be standing there like that....so they could be caught in the image? And that rock near the alleged person is towering over him....on a set..is that likely?...no it's not.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
The visor either shows aliens or a movie set.

You can't have it both ways.

As far as the figure: to me the legs are dirty - that was typical of the way the astronauts looked at the end of an excursion.

The proportions are all wrong for a stage hand.

It is either a gorilla in a hooded jumper or a man in a spacesuit.

There would be no reason to have a gorilla in a hooded jumper on the movie set.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
looking at it= imo it could be cgi................

Huh??? Early 70s technology? Your phone is faster than one of their mainframes.

Let's see: a moon photo shows what appears to be the other astronaut, the choices are:
1. An alien
2. The stage crew in a spacesuit.
3. A gorilla in a white hooded jumper
4. CGI which probably couldn't be rendered properly with months of computer time.
5. The other astronaut.

I'm still rough on the reasoning to pick 1-4. Apollo 9 fully tested (more or less) the LEM in earth orbit. So it had functioning facilities.
 

notdej

Honorable
Huh??? Early 70s technology? Your phone is faster than one of their mainframes.
Where did I suggest "Early 70s technology"?

You can grab an old photo & insert "modern cgi tech" at any time you want! ---can't ya Sherlock!?!?

Think before you speak-- especially when speaking to me. You should know that by now;)
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
Where did I suggest "Early 70s technology"?

You can grab an old photo & insert "modern cgi tech" at any time you want! ---can't ya Sherlock!?!?

Think before you speak-- especially when speaking to me. You should know that by now;)

All of these Apollo photos date to the early 70s. Later photos are all forgeries and hoaxes.

They were published in some form at the time (the exceptions are mostly uninteresting). This is why it is a little concerning that nobody has bothered to post originals of the NASA "alien" pictures.

As far as the little guy that is the subject.

If you look carefully it is the other astronaut facing toward the visor full on and his visor is framed against the EVA pack. The right side of the EV pack is in shadow.

There is no reason for stage hands to wear EVA packs.
 
Last edited:

Sheltie

Fratty and out of touch.
If the moon landings were staged, NASA at the very least sent rockets to the moon because even amateur astronomers had the ability to track them.
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
If the moon landings were staged, NASA at the very least sent rockets to the moon because even amateur astronomers had the ability to track them.

No doubt....but there are still nutcases that believe this and others.....like there were no aircraft involved in 9/11.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
could be the problem, is that i dont see the life support backpack thing

The still seems to be corrupted or looks different than the video splash page. So we will use the video splash page.

QS2uZc8.png



An astronaut for comparison:

conrad-bean-eva-apollo-12.jpg
 
Last edited:

ImmortalLegend527

The Messenger Of All Gods old and new
During the 1972 Apollo 17 mission to the moon a reflection of a possible stagehand appears in visor of an astronaut.
'MOON HOAX' Does 'stagehand reflected in astronaut's' visor prove it was filmed in studio?


www.youtube.com/watch?v=771BCym46JE

From what i saw..welll.Lets put it this way.

1.no moon dust came up when the fake ship landed or left.100% fact
2.Mortals never had the ability to go somewhere by rocket and come back by the same rocket.63% opinion.
3.By protocol of life and science and every government on this earth...YOU CAN NOT...YOU CAN NOT GO TO A PLANET BY SHIP OR A MOON AND COME BACK TO EARTH IN THE SAME SHIP.YOU MIGHT CONTAMINATE THE THE ENTIRE PLANET BY BRINGING A MICRONISEM OR VIRUS BACK TO EARTH THAT MIGHT WIPE OUT THE ENTIRE SPECIES OF HUMANS.1000% FACT.

You, will never in life, see a ship, drone, rocket or any other flying vehicle that they send to a planet, come back to earth its scientifically impossible and government impossible to even ask that to happen or do it without the consent of the world.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
From what i saw..welll.Lets put it this way.

1.no moon dust came up when the fake ship landed or left.100% fact
2.Mortals never had the ability to go somewhere by rocket and come back by the same rocket.63% opinion.
3.By protocol of life and science and every government on this earth...YOU CAN NOT...YOU CAN NOT GO TO A PLANET BY SHIP OR A MOON AND COME BACK TO EARTH IN THE SAME SHIP.YOU MIGHT CONTAMINATE THE THE ENTIRE PLANET BY BRINGING A MICRONISEM OR VIRUS BACK TO EARTH THAT MIGHT WIPE OUT THE ENTIRE SPECIES OF HUMANS.1000% FACT.

You, will never in life, see a ship, drone, rocket or any other flying vehicle that they send to a planet, come back to earth its scientifically impossible and government impossible to even ask that to happen or do it without the consent of the world.

Well... no.

The lunar dust is only 5-10 cm thick and the regolith below that doesn't move much.

The lander didn't sink into the surface, so the area of the lander is free from dust.

The dust would have gone hundreds of meters or more so there wouldn't be a "crater" effect.



The claim that there wasn't dust blown away on landing is as far as I can tell, a damned lie.
 
Top