The Phobos Incident.

CasualBystander

Celestial
Well...

This one is a little odd.

Functioning spacecraft stops functioning after taking odd pictures of an odd moon.

Density shape etc. of Phobos don't make sense.

Oversized space station is a possibility.
 

Toroid

Founding Member
David Wilcock wrote that most of the moons in our solar system have been hollowed out or mined by at least one race. He mentioned the Ancient Builder Race as being a primary contributor. What's interesting is the Blue Avian race may have been the ABR.
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
Don't you want to know if there are more ?

I'm still waiting to see if there are any structures on Mars or its moon that are unnatural......and no I'm not looking for them. I think martian geology is amazing enough to look at.

As for the chucklehead in the OP....no I'm not going to look at anymore of his videos. Its up to people to back up their claims.....its not my job. All I know is I usually get my questions answered.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
My view is that a well designed two lander probe failed at a point in the flight program when failure would not be expected.

A retry of this specific mission would be worthwhile.
 

1963

Noble
Hi Auggie, hope all's well down there in Taz my friend. :tumbsup:

This was a great bit of theatre that had me enthralled for about 20 years [since I saw a documentary on channel 4 years ago] .. but i'm afraid that it's since been comprehensively debunked, and would appear to be no more than a case of a couple of promising probes that broke at two different times. And the two anomalous photos aka the shadow and the approaching giant space craft... weren't anything to do with aliens or UFO's ... but in fact were pixilation-bleed and phobos' own shadow . :Tongue:

This site might explain it better and in more detail.... forgetomori » Phobos 2: a Bloody Soviet ‘Close Encounter’

Cheers Auggie.
 

August

Metanoia
Hi Auggie, hope all's well down there in Taz my friend.

This was a great bit of theatre that had me enthralled for about 20 years [since I saw a documentary on channel 4 years ago] .. but i'm afraid that it's since been comprehensively debunked, and would appear to be no more than a case of a couple of promising probes that broke at two different times. And the two anomalous photos aka the shadow and the approaching giant space craft... weren't anything to do with aliens or UFO's ... but in fact were pixilation-bleed and phobos' own shadow .

This site might explain it better and in more detail.... forgetomori » Phobos 2: a Bloody Soviet ‘Close Encounter’

Cheers Auggie.

Hi 1963 , yes I am fine , hope you are as well . Thanks for the fabulous input its always appreciated. :)
 

Dundee

Fading day by day.
I'm still waiting to see if there are any structures on Mars or its moon that are unnatural......and no I'm not looking for them. I think martian geology is amazing enough to look at.

As for the chucklehead in the OP....no I'm not going to look at anymore of his videos. Its up to people to back up their claims.....its not my job. All I know is I usually get my questions answered.
Lol, your a hard man Castle :)
That is a very scientific answer on your part mate, "Its up to people to back up their claims" is it really?
It certainly is for an Academic making some statement. But a lot of the stuff presented here and on other websites are nothing more than, "Hey check this, this is what I found, this is my take on it"
I am probably less of a skeptic than you I suspect, and as you say there was no infrared images he claimed existed. But I didn't really pick him for a chuckle head lol :)
Remember, it is an worn out, misused and abused line I agree, but...

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!"
Carl Sagan.

Call me ignorant if it is warranted, but, here is what I got from the video.

On the side of wonder...
  • Some awfully weird shapes on the surface of mars.
  • An object of some sort 20km long appearing just before a space probe shuts down.
  • Some apparently crazy arse shadows on the surface of mars.
  • A Russian scientist coming forward with some spooky unexplained photos.

On the side of the skeptic...
  • No proof whatsoever.
  • No infrared images presented.
  • Much wild speculation.
  • However no alternate explanation.
Don't you think your doing yourself an injustice by being so dismissive?
And
In advance...
Peace man :)
 

Dundee

Fading day by day.
And on a slightly off topic note.
I will post this here as being a bit of a dummy I dont really know where else I would put it and it washere I had the epiphany :)

I would like to thank our friend August for her tireless work here.
Every day I drop in and there is yet another really interesting thread started with great thought provoking content.
Your efforts here make every visit a new adventure, from the Latest Trump absurdity to a weird rock on mars, to an artifact in the depths of a Pyramid.
Never a dull moment.
Thanks heaps August for your tireless efforts.
OK, sorry, back on topic :)
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
Hi Auggie, hope all's well down there in Taz my friend. :tumbsup:

This was a great bit of theatre that had me enthralled for about 20 years [since I saw a documentary on channel 4 years ago] .. but i'm afraid that it's since been comprehensively debunked, and would appear to be no more than a case of a couple of promising probes that broke at two different times. And the two anomalous photos aka the shadow and the approaching giant space craft... weren't anything to do with aliens or UFO's ... but in fact were pixilation-bleed and phobos' own shadow . :Tongue:

This site might explain it better and in more detail.... forgetomori » Phobos 2: a Bloody Soviet ‘Close Encounter’

Cheers Auggie.

Well...

This is a coherent explanation for the "UFO" and the "Shadow".

Further the pictures with time sequence and distance is nice.

These probes tend to fail when executing a command or doing an orbital maneuver.

That doesn't seem to be the case here.
 
Top