THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE

CasualBystander

Celestial
OK, not to stab you with another pin in the backside with nitpicking because that's not the intent. The intent is to use what you said to bring forward challenging information to the group. So I'm using you...smile...typical huh?

So begin with keeping in mind that electrons are unproven hypothetical components of atoms. Time will tell if the electron theory holds up. For now though they form a workable context to explain interactions. The problem with the theoretical idea behind electrons is that many great minds opposed their existence, and despite how well this theory has worked, it's not wise to forget that it could be wrong, and it does have problems. Frankly I think we just don't know enough yet.

Now it just so happens this specific issue has taken and is taking a significant part of current and past time. I had doubts about their existence but the more I learn the greater they seem to be validated. Yet again this could be illusionary so it's unclear whether we really understand what is taking place at the atomic level.

I say this because an atom is formed in space out of the anther of the unknown. This is where this business about quantum bullshit arises. In bullshit theory quanta pop into and out of existence. Some stay and other don't. OK, well this is all magical thinking without any basis in reality. It isn't science, it's bullshit, and it's soon to be shown as the bullshit that it really is because there's new information using real science which has shown it's bullshit.

The Double Slit Experiment Re-Explained
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/papers/Vol8-issue4/Version-3/M0804038698.pdf

This unknown was called the aether in earlier times and today some might call it dark matter, hyperspace, or counter-space. Now here's where it begins to take on a twist. A guy named Ken Wheeler wrote a book on Magnetism. Since Ken's work there has been a number of individuals whom have validated much of Wheelers writing. *Note:
I would pay specific attention to what this reviewer says at the link about Ken Wheelers book.
Reviewer: robstawithlove - favoritefavoritefavorite - October 9, 2016
Uncovering the missing Secrets of Magnetism : Ken L Wheeler : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

What comes out of Wheeler's writing is an new understanding of the magnetic field and where it comes from, and this has implications which threaten to blow up a number of magically inclined ideas in physics and electrodynamics which have been with us for the last 70+ years.

Now essentially the aether is explained as the Dielectric Field = Counterspace/Aether. Magnetism originates (emanates) from the aether, and it is also where magnetism discharges (returns). The magnetic force, which is the nuclear force, emanates from the precise center of any magnetic field. It forms a magnetic field in a ball shape. What Ken Wheeler wrote has been validated by many others. We now know this is a factual truth.

Magnetism is what gives matter cohesion. The nuclear force is a magnetic force and magnetism is the product of that unknown space which is the aether/counter-space. In other words, it is through this other world of the aether/counter-space which gives rise to our own world. We exist through the that worlds energies, and which creates the nuclear magnetic bonds that holds all matter together in this reality.

To return then to our present ideas about electron theory is to question what is an electron, how's this work inside of what we are now learning about the true nature of the magnetic field. We may find that what we have is like a childs explanation, inaccurate but understandable in a flawed way, but which provides a step stone to a greater truth. For now though, we will use the electron theory as the valuable tool that it has proven itself to be and for which we really have no other alternative.

Umm...

This is nonsense.

The theory that you can strip the B or E field off a photon is not credible.

The paired E-B fields are why photons propagate.

I'll admit I'm in the pilot wave camp and think the Copenhagen interpretation is fantasy.

But that is as far I go.
 

notdej

Honorable
Umm...

This is nonsense.

The theory that you can strip the B or E field off a photon is not credible.

The paired E-B fields are why photons propagate.

I'll admit I'm in the pilot wave camp and think the Copenhagen interpretation is fantasy.

But that is as far I go.
It's sooo full of nonsense it's taken you months to reply to it!?!
Bored are ya!??== looking through the threads in an attempt to create discourse?
Nothing new to talk about is there!
Yeah- I know how you feel;)
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
It's sooo full of nonsense it's taken you months to reply to it!?!
Bored are ya!??== looking through the threads in an attempt to create discourse?
Nothing new to talk about is there!
Yeah- I know how you feel;)

I was letting it age for a little bit.

I don't like to read news unless it is at least a week old. News and science studies are like Microsoft patches. You need to let other people try it first in case it isn't stable.
 

notdej

Honorable
I was letting it age for a little bit.

I don't like to read news unless it is at least a week old. News and science studies are like Microsoft patches. You need to let other people try it first in case it isn't stable.
so going by your way of looking at things; this thread is now stable in your opinion?

explain?
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
so going by your way of looking at things; this thread is now stable in your opinion?

explain?

Stable: a building in which domestic animals are sheltered and fed.

Actually I read one of the papers and found my self muttering bullshit at least every other paragraph.
 

notdej

Honorable
Stable: a building in which domestic animals are sheltered and fed.

Actually I read one of the papers and found my self muttering bullshit at least every other paragraph.
honestly=== myself being (imo) an inteligent adult:

i've no idea what the fuck you're talking about mate!!

if you're making a point then make it! if you actually know what point it is you're trying to make that is!?:(
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
honestly=== myself being (imo) an inteligent adult:

i've no idea what the fuck you're talking about mate!!

if you're making a point then make it! if you actually know what point it is you're trying to make that is!?:(

Anyone familiar with field theory knows an alternating e-field generates an alternating b-field and vice versa.

A photon exists because energy is dumped into the e-field when the b-field collapses and vice versa.

If you strip off the b-field the photon ceases to exist. If you strip off the e-field the photon ceases to exist.

That's how polarization works.

A photon viewed head on looks like an X with the two blades 90° apart.
 
Last edited:

notdej

Honorable
Anyone familiar with field theory knows an alternating e-field generates an alternating b-field and vice versa.

A photon exists because energy is dumped into the e-field when the b-field collapses and vice versa.

If you strip off the b-field the photon ceases to exist. If you strip off the e-field the photon ceases to exist.

That's how polarization works.

A photon viewed head on looks like an X with the two blades 90° apart.
talk about miss the point!!!!

you suggested you don't reply to things until they become stable.... so what's become 'stable' in this thread that we now have the honour of your good self becoming a participant? it's a simple question-- or are you just bored?

you should know by now that it's best to think before you speak-- especially when speaking to me;)
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
talk about miss the point!!!!

you suggested you don't reply to things until they become stable.... so what's become 'stable' in this thread that we now have the honour of your good self becoming a participant? it's a simple question-- or are you just bored?

you should know by now that it's best to think before you speak-- especially when speaking to me;)

The articles talk about the double slit experiment result happening because it is the e-field hitting the target after the b-field was stripped off.

The e-field doesn't exist if you strip off the b-field.
 

3FEL9

Islander
Anyone familiar with field theory knows an alternating e-field generates an alternating b-field and vice versa.

A photon exists because energy is dumped into the e-field when the b-field collapses and vice versa.

If you strip off the b-field the photon ceases to exist. If you strip off the e-field the photon ceases to exist.

That's how polarization works.

A photon viewed head on looks like an X with the two blades 90° apart.


Where is the source for your wild claims ?? Unless you've seen it with your own eyes ?
 
Top