Building a spacecraft qualifies as “manipulating matter.”there are several caracteristics wich i think would only be present in a true ETH contact:
1: aliens should have some visible means of manipulating matter
Gravitational field propulsion is both theoretically viable, and the only known method for traversing interstellar distances without incurring time dilation penalties. So it's both physically viable and "realistic." The dynamics of the theory also match the reported observations perfectly. So we know that it's possible, and we have widespread observational confirmation that it's the preferred mode of propulsion for AAVs across the world and spanning at least seven decades of reporting.2: the UFO should do things that the laws of physics account for
3: the UFO should have a realistic mean of travelling across space
I’ve never seen any compelling evidence that anyone or anything can pass through solid matter.4: neither the aliens neither the UFO can pass trough solid matter
But it can’t be ruled out either. “Solid matter” is almost entirely empty space. So a sufficiently advanced technology may be able to provide means of moving one object through another. Given a 1-3 billion year head start, it’s impossible to know what would eventually become scientifically achievable.
Arthur C. Clarke wrote: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."5: aliens should never do anything wich breaks the laws of physics, or can be classified as "magic"
That’s important to bear in mind, because today’s technological capabilities would have seemed exactly like magic just one or more centuries ago. Quantum teleportation, the laser, smartphones, holograms – the list goes on and on. Only a fool would expect to understand all of the technologies available to a species that had mastered interstellar spaceflight.
Another absurd statement. People who don’t have UFO encounters, have paranormal experiences. So ruling out people who have had AAV experiences, because they subsequently also had a paranormal experience, is totally illogical.6: witness should have never had paranormal experiences of any type following the encounter
Whatever that means.7: the encounter should happen in a area wich is paranormally inactive
Do you even listen to yourself? First of all, who are you to say how “true scientists” should behave? Richard Feynman was a Nobel laureate physicist who enjoyed playing bongos and flirting with women.8: the aliens should behave like true scientists and not clows toying with the witness
suffice to say i have never heard of such a encounter
But it’s absurd to project your own beliefs about how “an alien should act,” upon reality, and then reject the reality because it doesn’t conform to your own expectations.
Reality is not obligated to conform to your expectations. Most people realize that by the third grade.
Well that’s absurd. Dismissing the personal testimony of our top fighter pilots, and highly trained professional military radar operators, requires a level of arrogance that even I can’t aspire to.the only HARD evidence they released are the videos and the testemonies, everthing else can be ignored
But it’s totally hypocritical also – because you have zero evidence, “hard” or otherwise, to support your own totally illogical and unintelligible “extradimensional ultraterrestrial” aka “supernatural” hypothesis.
So you want a photo of a dead alien body. Good luck with that. Even if the government had an alien corpse, which I doubt but can't rule out, they’d never show it to you, aka the public. Take a few minutes to study government classification.at least a photo of such a thing coming from a official document or something
I wish you’d keep it private, then. Because your irrational assaults upon science and reason, which you’re posting all over the internet and this forum in particular, forces me to waste hours of my time writing rebuttals like this one.what you are reading right now isn't my research, in fact i probally will never release my research to the public, i want it to be private
Only a religious fanatic would state that the ETH is worse than a totally supernatural explanation that defies all known laws of physical reality and a mountain of empirical evidence.ufo lore is even worse than that
That makes no sense. We know for a fact that most of the government’s work on this topic has been and continues to be classified. Therefore it’s quite possible that someone who’s privy to that information could leak some of it. Such a person would be, by definition, a whistleblower.i will never use the word whistlebower in a non-sarcastic sense because the very idea of a ufological whistleblower is silly
Last edited: