Agreed. Like I said, back in the 70's & 80's I was a true believer & would spout out "flying saucer facts/cases" to the non believers & force family members & friends to watch documentaries. One of the things I would show is the intro to "UFO's Are Real" (there are several docs w/ this same title & with Stanton F. which is confusing) - there is the daylight Catalina Island footage shot from a helicopter. The narrator goes on to say "...it has no wings, no tail section & no visible means of propulsion." So when I would show that to people I'd say something like "See? This documentary just started & within the first two minutes they show a real flying saucer flying through the air! Just wait until you see the rest of the 'evidence'!" Then come to find out years later the flying saucer was a Cessna - as proven by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory analysis. Then the rest of the cases in the doc are all bunk (to me at least). B&B Hill, Rex Heflin, Paul Trent, etc. Then the last case I've held on to that I thought was a real encounter was the Coyne case which in my mind - is explained. For their grand finale they spend quite a while on the Meier case - which I don't need to go into. Anyway.....I'd be stupid to think that there is no life out there - but I don't think there is any proof that any of that life or their space vehicles has visited the Earth. Yes, there are lots of stories that sound pretty darn convincing but proof? Not in my mind. I have to admit it sucks learning all my cases that I thought were solid turned out to be garbage. I guess it's kinda like when a kid finally figures out there is no Santa Claus :/