UFO videos

1963

Noble
What if one was not a boffin. How would one go about proving that the 'skinny-Bob tape' was unequivocally genuine, 1963?
Hi Michael, …. Well I'd say?,.. successfully refute all of the boffins' assertions that it is a hoax. Provide a good solid bit of provenance for the videos. And finally, …. break Ivan's anonymity and let's see him/her provide an attestable account of his legitimate possession of the marvellous film.
In other words, prove that the old maxim of 'if something unusual and Earth shatteringly fantastic, without a shred of proof, looks too good to be true … then it's more than a reasonable assumption that, it is in fact too good to be true!'
On many occasion I have sincerely opined that the 'Skinny-Bob tape' is in my humble opinion the number one supereminent bit of YT ETH tomfoolery. … And I still say it's great. But without any corroborating evidence , other than it just looking good, Then for me at least , tomfoolery it will always be Michael.
…. or do you know something that I don't mate? :Unsure:

Cheers buddy.
 

michael59

Celestial
Hi Michael, …. Well I'd say?,.. successfully refute all of the boffins' assertions that it is a hoax. Provide a good solid bit of provenance for the videos. And finally, …. break Ivan's anonymity and let's see him/her provide an attestable account of his legitimate possession of the marvellous film.
In other words, prove that the old maxim of 'if something unusual and Earth shatteringly fantastic, without a shred of proof, looks too good to be true … then it's more than a reasonable assumption that, it is in fact too good to be true!'
On many occasion I have sincerely opined that the 'Skinny-Bob tape' is in my humble opinion the number one supereminent bit of YT ETH tomfoolery. … And I still say it's great. But without any corroborating evidence , other than it just looking good, Then for me at least , tomfoolery it will always be Michael.
…. or do you know something that I don't mate? :Unsure:

Cheers buddy.

No, I don't have any inside information that would/could prove the tape authentic. It's just my gut feeling, sometimes that's all anyone has to go on, ya know what I mean?

It is the only thing I have ever come across that looks exactly like the real deal. I know how that makes me sound but, I know what I have seen up close and personal, on multiple occasions and they look exactly like Skinny Bob. Every detail is correct right down to the clothing.

My gut is also telling me that "Ivan" is long dead.

Thanks, 1963. :)
 

1963

Noble
No, I don't have any inside information that would/could prove the tape authentic. It's just my gut feeling, sometimes that's all anyone has to go on, ya know what I mean?

It is the only thing I have ever come across that looks exactly like the real deal. I know how that makes me sound but, I know what I have seen up close and personal, on multiple occasions and they look exactly like Skinny Bob. Every detail is correct right down to the clothing.

My gut is also telling me that "Ivan" is long dead.

Thanks, 1963. :)
Hi Michael, thanks for the clarifying response my friend. Because I was a little confused as to where you were going with this 'Skinny-Bob' reference. But now knowing that you may well be in a far more advanced position than me to discern the validity of the basic appearance of the presented article [as in a genuine Alien Grey] ... then all becomes clear as crystal .
ie… you vouch for the video on the seemingly sound premise of you have experienced multiple encounters of the fourth .. and/or possibly the fifth kind, [if so then I would totally agree that you definitely better placed than I ].
Now here comes the tricky part of my response to that mate. And I say tricky because … not having any real personal experience of the ETH , and am powered toward the proponency side of the hypothesis by dint of a lifetime's study of the subject, personal recounting from friends and family members. [with varying degrees of believability] and the laws of probability. [in other words .. common sense!]
And as I do not like to backtrack on my previous assertions that I personally believe that the instances of 'Alien Abduction' [and any form of personal contact] that I am willing to give any credence to is a relatively tiny number, … and almost none of the 'big-celebrated-cases' then to say that I would readily take for granted that anyone on this site [or any other for that matter] has in fact been the experiencer of such an extraordinary encounter and not 'fooling, being fooled, lying or simply mistaking the correct interpretation of their own dreams... would be quite frankly ingenuous of me. However, I rule very little out as an absolute. Even with my serious doubts about the validity of this [now massive and growing] phenomena, I am always willing to consider that I may well be wrong, and as such would never mock nor doubt your integrity my friend. :Thumbsup:
A K A... as far as I know you might not be mistaken and may well be telling the truth Michael, and it would be easier for me to just go with the flow and say that I absolutely believe that you have suffered multiple AAs , but in the spirit of openness , [which I believe is the keystone to real and lasting friendship] I have to say that without any real and tangible corroboration to your testimony, I can find no excuse for saying that I believe that your experiences are genuinely extra-terrestrial-being related.
And yet, I willingly concede that your own opinion on the veracity of the Skinny-Bob-film is every bit as paramount as my own and anyone else's matey. And in this case, the known facts are that … I on one hand believe that the film is that good-looking that if any that i'd seen turned out to be 'the genuine article' without me knowing, it wouldn't surprise me the it was this one,... but I still doubt it, and believe that Ivan 0135' was no more than a very clever YT-$-maker.
...and you on the other hand go a step further due to your perceived experience, and are willing to state that you believe firmly that the tape is genuine and extend that because of this, the identity of the aforementioned Ivan 0135' has in all probability been ascertained and therefore nefariously dealt with by the clandestine cover-up forces that we both agree police this business.
So, we'll have to agree to disagree on this matter Michael. But we do agree on a lot of other things and are both grown up enough to remain good friends aren't we mate. q3

Cheers Buddy.
 

michael59

Celestial
Hi Michael, thanks for the clarifying response my friend. Because I was a little confused as to where you were going with this 'Skinny-Bob' reference. But now knowing that you may well be in a far more advanced position than me to discern the validity of the basic appearance of the presented article [as in a genuine Alien Grey] ... then all becomes clear as crystal .
ie… you vouch for the video on the seemingly sound premise of you have experienced multiple encounters of the fourth .. and/or possibly the fifth kind, [if so then I would totally agree that you definitely better placed than I ].
Now here comes the tricky part of my response to that mate. And I say tricky because … not having any real personal experience of the ETH , and am powered toward the proponency side of the hypothesis by dint of a lifetime's study of the subject, personal recounting from friends and family members. [with varying degrees of believability] and the laws of probability. [in other words .. common sense!]
And as I do not like to backtrack on my previous assertions that I personally believe that the instances of 'Alien Abduction' [and any form of personal contact] that I am willing to give any credence to is a relatively tiny number, … and almost none of the 'big-celebrated-cases' then to say that I would readily take for granted that anyone on this site [or any other for that matter] has in fact been the experiencer of such an extraordinary encounter and not 'fooling, being fooled, lying or simply mistaking the correct interpretation of their own dreams... would be quite frankly ingenuous of me. However, I rule very little out as an absolute. Even with my serious doubts about the validity of this [now massive and growing] phenomena, I am always willing to consider that I may well be wrong, and as such would never mock nor doubt your integrity my friend. :Thumbsup:
A K A... as far as I know you might not be mistaken and may well be telling the truth Michael, and it would be easier for me to just go with the flow and say that I absolutely believe that you have suffered multiple AAs , but in the spirit of openness , [which I believe is the keystone to real and lasting friendship] I have to say that without any real and tangible corroboration to your testimony, I can find no excuse for saying that I believe that your experiences are genuinely extra-terrestrial-being related.
And yet, I willingly concede that your own opinion on the veracity of the Skinny-Bob-film is every bit as paramount as my own and anyone else's matey. And in this case, the known facts are that … I on one hand believe that the film is that good-looking that if any that i'd seen turned out to be 'the genuine article' without me knowing, it wouldn't surprise me the it was this one,... but I still doubt it, and believe that Ivan 0135' was no more than a very clever YT-$-maker.
...and you on the other hand go a step further due to your perceived experience, and are willing to state that you believe firmly that the tape is genuine and extend that because of this, the identity of the aforementioned Ivan 0135' has in all probability been ascertained and therefore nefariously dealt with by the clandestine cover-up forces that we both agree police this business.
So, we'll have to agree to disagree on this matter Michael. But we do agree on a lot of other things and are both grown up enough to remain good friends aren't we mate. q3

Cheers Buddy.

Yes, of course. xxxx6666 And again, thank you for responding. :)
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Hi Nivek, I like this one because unlike many from the same source, it is rather simple and realistically believable that there is no shenanigans to the clip. Having said that, of course I cannot state my opinion as to what the lights were with any degree of confidence, …. but my initial thoughts when viewing the clip was that it might just be a small jet squadron exercise , and what we were briefly witnessing was the afterburners coming on, and then quickly disappearing from view as the jets banked left of screen. … well, that's just an initial guess you know mate. I wish that I could believe that this next video in his sequence wasn't just a mocked up/cgi clickbait stunt ….


... but i can't! ... What do you or anyone else think my old mate?

Cheers Buddy.


I really like the videos, both the one I posted and this one you posted, and I would like to believe they are legitimate video captures, but after further review especially giving much consideration of your wise input into these videos, I think there may be some shenanigans involved, perhaps just to get more clicks...Its a shame the internet is so full of fake stuff that we have to sometimes sort through first, not implying these are hoax videos, but its quite possible...

...
 

nivek

As Above So Below
 

nivek

As Above So Below
 

Dejan Corovic

As above, so bellow
I haven't seen this video discussed here yet, what are these unidentified flying objects in orbit with Columbia?...



Straight thing is a tendon which was released from space station but it snapped.

Now, the floating circle with a black dot in the middle is what's a mystery. Some people point towards a fact that space station windows are double glazed and that there is some dust left there during the vehicle construction. Now in micro gravity environment that dust naturally floats. Since camera lens was focused on the snapped tendon, the piece of dust in the window is out of the focus and it has an enlarged fuzzy fringe. That would be down to earth explanation.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
 

1963

Noble
Hi Nivek, I like this one because unlike many from the same source, it is rather simple and realistically believable that there is no shenanigans to the clip. Having said that, of course I cannot state my opinion as to what the lights were with any degree of confidence, …. but my initial thoughts when viewing the clip was that it might just be a small jet squadron exercise , and what we were briefly witnessing was the afterburners coming on, and then quickly disappearing from view as the jets banked left of screen. … well, that's just an initial guess you know mate. I wish that I could believe that this next video in his sequence wasn't just a mocked up/cgi clickbait stunt ….


... but i can't! ... What do you or anyone else think my old mate?

Cheers Buddy.

a bit late I know, but just found this to go with the post...


Cheers.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
 
Top