Dejan Corovic
As above, so bellow
Tons and tons of circumstantial evidence, eyewitness testimony means that we tons of that stuff, not proof of extraterrestrial visitation.
That is not true. Here is the simple reason. A witness can do 3 things:
1) Tell a lie:
If lier lies about something he can't understand he will get caught. I witness is telling a lie, then his preservation instinct will force him to lie about something he understands. Because 99.99% witnesses don't understand neither electromagnetism, nor general relativity these witnesses will refrain from describing scientific effects.
2) Be delusional
If the witness is delusional his physical observations reports will be all over the place and will make neither common nor scientific sense.
3) Tell a truth:
If witnesses told us the truth than their observations will be in agreement with electromagnetism and general relativity. In at least 80% of cases that I read there was one or few details that were 100% in agreement with electromagnetism or general relativity. If they would be lying that would be impossible.
What about all the people who claim alien abduction?
Alien abductions have to be completely excluded because they are totally overloaded with subjectivity.
That is not a case with witness reports where nobody was abducted by significant scientifically valid observations were made. I mean, in the 1957 RB-47 case, an electronic eavesdropping plane loaded with the best electronic equipment of the time, 5 crew members 1.) visually observed, 2.) located with radar, and 3.) measured with passive electromagnetic instruments a presence of UFO, and everything was recorded on tapes. None of them was abducted, nor drunk on a duty, nor wanted to be famous. From a scientific perspective, there is no doubt it was UFO, but government confiscated and hid the tapes.
Last edited: