i think its a seagull, i remenber a famous debunker said that
scott brando owner of ufoofinterest.comWho was the famous debunker ?
scott brando owner of ufoofinterest.com
nope, i too think its one, location, color and movement/speed matchWas he the only one to think it was a seagull ?
nope, i too think its one, location, color and movement/speed match
Falling Angel
nope, i too think its one, location, color and movement/speed match
yep, what else could it beCase closed huh ?
i use it in the cultural sense, just in case a ufology illiterate is reading my posts, i dont want to cause confusionIt does not sound like you are implying the use of 'UFO' in the same way as I do...I take it quite literal, U unidentified F flying O object...If an object in a photograph is unidentifiable then apart from any obvious CG creation or tampering, how would you know if it is a 'fake' UFO or a 'real' UFO, keeping in mind the literal meaning of UFO?...
.
sadly on his website he writes only in italian, wich is impossible to understand without google translator, however he writes in english in his twitter: ufoofinterest.org (@ufoofinterest) | Twitter
literal or cultural sense ?A UFO perhaps?...
.
well then technically you are right, it could be something other than a seagull, i just think its the more probable explanationFrom me always literal...
.
yep, what else could it be
its the most probable explanationThat's awfully presumptive on your part. Smacks of arrogance actually. You say its so it is ? I don't think so .