U.S. Space Force to Fight Extraterrestrial Wars

Toroid

Founding Member
NASA chief supports Trump's Space Force.
NASA chief backs Trump's Space Force proposal
Whatever you think of Trump's proposed Space Force, it has at least one ally in its corner: recently-installed (and Trump-selected) NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine. In an interview with Axios, Bridenstine argued that space was becoming "more contested" and that the US had to be "willing to defend" space in order to maintain it. He argued that the Chinese and Russians were developing not only anti-satellite missiles, but co-orbital satellite weapons, jammers and other spaceborne threats. Allegedly, the Chinese see the US' lack of space weapons as an "Achilles' heel" it could exploit.

Bridenstine stressed that the Pentagon would be responsible for the Space Force if it goes forward. He just supported the notion of a unit that protects astronauts and the "billion-dollar-plus investments" they're using.

There is a degree of truth to the concern in that other countries have been developing anti-satellite weaponry for years -- it's not as if they're going to stop. It's not certain that these countries intend to attack or disable US space assets, though, and there's a worry that the Space Force would lead to a militarization of space that people have sought to avoid for decades. As it is, the NASA administrator's voice only carries so much weight -- it's ultimately up to the Pentagon to decide if a Space Force is viable.
trump_space_force.jpg
 

Standingstones

Celestial
I would tend to believe that the US already has a Space Force in place. Back in 2002 UK citizen Gary McKinnon hacked into the military network and saw information on a Space Navy. The US government wanted to extradite him in the worst way but the UK government wouldn’t hand him over. You can bet he would never have seen the light of day again for stealing a secret such as that.
 

Gambeir

Celestial
Now take a look at this video by Crrow 777 distributed in 2014 of a supposed UFO Orb shooting at chemtrails. That's not what is actually happening. I'll explain with the help of my friend in the second video below.

This is not the only video by any means showing the wireless transmission of power to supposed UFO's, but it is one from a widely acknowledged truthful source.



What you're actually seeing here is wireless power transmission, and the whole real purpose of chemtrails is to produce a conductive trail in the atmosphere which is used to re~supply power to suborbital machines which your criminal leaders are claiming are alien space ships.

It's unclear to me whether or not these chemtrails are accessing earth's natural ion field which is a highly charged energy field freely available.
Power
https://ionpowergroup.com/how-it-works-on-earth


Cell towers are connecting networks of airborne transmission lines, and so that as one line fades and becomes unviable, then the next newer one is switching on to connect and maintain a global energy grid: Make sense now?

You have to understand that the energy required to produce the effects of these ships is gigantic. This power generating and transmission system is positive proof that the theoreticals other think are still speculation are in fact actually real world technology.


Hopefully after a time this will gell in your mind and make sense and you will have a much greater idea as to the grandness and complexity of the lies we are being told. Hope this helps people to realize the truth behind the lies and their cell phone providers real interests.

 
Last edited:

1963

Noble
If there was really any kind of "Space Force" already in operation, as many 'dubious-in-the-know-sources' have [and are still continuously claiming] ... Then what is the velocity and range of their 'patrol craft'? ... I mean, .. even at the measly figure of 36000 mph [which is what is the conservative figure often quoted as being our present known capability for space travel] then it would take them just over a year [422.5 days] to get to Europa which is by far the most interesting body of curiosity for scientists in our own solar system. ... Or just over half that time to get to Mars and do what those feeble probes can't do.. [and fix poor old Colin's Beagle 2] ... oh! i'll not go on and on, but the point is that if we had such an asset as "A Space Fleet" then you can bet your bottom dollar that it would be utilised as fully as possible, thereby fulfilling the point of such successful enterprise and not just cruising around the neighbourhood trying hard to not be detected by the comparatively intellectual ants that share the planet with us. Just look at the cost of such an epic enterprise ... if we are to believe the claims made by these imaginative jokers [that all make a decent living out of book deals, symposium circuits, tv etc] then the whole thing must have been going on for years... decades, and costing trillions of US dollars ... So the big question must be, ... why still spend all of that money on sending all of these dodgy little probes to Mars etc? ... Voyagers $7,000,000.000. , Curiosity $2,800,000,000., Rosetta $2,500,000,000. etc ... not to mention the mere $192,000,000,000, bill for the space shuttle programme. ... Oh! and don't forget that all this was done in secret whilst all of the rest of the world were looking the other way! :Whistle:

[Oh wait,... come to think of it?...I'll bet my dad's old heroes Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon started all this off back in the early thirties! :Sneaky:] ... Please excuse the sarcasm, but this non event is just too silly to take seriously.

Cheers.
 

Standingstones

Celestial
NASA has always been the friendly face of the US space program. Show the people back on Earth we are exploring space.The US government doesn’t publish what it does with secret, black budget money. You might remember that in 2001, September 10 to be exact, Donald Rumsfeld went before Congress to report that 2.3 Trillion dollars had gone unaccounted for. Not Billions but Trillions. That’s how the US military operates.

A Space Fleet would have many purposes. Any country that controls the ‘high ground’ will be calling the shots back in Earth. Undoubtably various countries already have military space platforms in place or are working to launch such things. A fleet could be used to maintain and defend such platforms. The money spent on launching probes into space is a pittance compared to what gets spent secretly by the military.
 

APIGuy

Independent Field Investigator
NASA has always been the friendly face of the US space program. Show the people back on Earth we are exploring space.The US government doesn’t publish what it does with secret, black budget money. You might remember that in 2001, September 10 to be exact, Donald Rumsfeld went before Congress to report that 2.3 Trillion dollars had gone unaccounted for. Not Billions but Trillions. That’s how the US military operates.

A Space Fleet would have many purposes. Any country that controls the ‘high ground’ will be calling the shots back in Earth. Undoubtably various countries already have military space platforms in place or are working to launch such things. A fleet could be used to maintain and defend such platforms. The money spent on launching probes into space is a pittance compared to what gets spent secretly by the military.

No questions there are classified space missions, but we know which agencies run them. There isn't a space force. The USAF has had for some time a Space and Missiles Command, and you can follow them on Twitter.
 

APIGuy

Independent Field Investigator
Space x is a diversion and for public show so say some claims...

...

No one who's informed about the situation really thinks that. They've taken the old guard space establishment completely by surprise with their high success rate and low prices, but what could they possibly distract from? There was lots of SpaceX badmouthing at first, but that's dying down, as it's completely failed to gain traction.

There are many, many high information people who follow every launch all over the world with rapt attention, and have been doing so since the dawn of the space age..
 

Standingstones

Celestial
There is little doubt in my mind that the US either has a space fleet or is working on it as we speak. Having the government come out by saying the fleet is now imminent is a way to condition the citizens. Once you announce such plans that means there is money being spent on it right now.

The US government knows there are other countries planning trips to the Moon and then Mars. You can’t sit on your hands and do nothing. We might not see it come to pass in our lifetimes, but you can rest assured some group is working on space travel plans and weapons platforms in space.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Why are we are paying Russians to launch Americans in space if we have all this money to build a 'space force'?...We should have kept the shuttle program going and had new shuttles ready to replace the old ones...

...
 

Toroid

Founding Member
Why are we are paying Russians to launch Americans in space if we have all this money to build a 'space force'?...We should have kept the shuttle program going and had new shuttles ready to replace the old ones...

...
It could be a scarcity motivator. They end the shuttle program and push the civilian sector into the business of launching rockets.
 

spacecase0

earth human
I see this just like the SR71
the USA only gets rid of things that are very outdated
the SR71 was only brought back to save money...
there is no way the USA got rid of space travel
have you looked at the black budget at all ?
what do you think they have been doing with that much money ?
even total idiots would have space domination after spending that much for so many years.
the cold war was an economic battle,
and for some reason, the USA never quit after winning.
maybe it is just me, but thinking that none of that money or time was spent on space domination seems a bit out of place
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
Why are we are paying Russians to launch Americans in space if we have all this money to build a 'space force'?...We should have kept the shuttle program going and had new shuttles ready to replace the old ones...

...

I wish so too but those Shuttles just weren't economically viable. And we had lost two of them already. Once you check the nationalistic pride there are cheaper ways of getting payloads into orbit. But as a point of nationalistic pride, you betcha we have means at our disposal to put all sorts of interesting payloads into orbit and probably beyond as needed

Then there's the Orion program. I don't think we're quite ready to build the first twelve - Starship or Constitution class (depending on your level of geekery) - vessels just yet. Investing in Orion seems like an awfully resource intensive proposition to simply be the maskirovka for the fleet of battlestars some think we have.
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable

When you walk in the front door of the Udvar-Hazy National Air & Space Center there's an SR71 to greet you. What a hellified machine that is! It set world speed records on it's retirement flight - took off in California and did a loop over the Pacific, turned around and hit the gas. Took it some distance out over the Atlantic before they slowed it down sufficiently to turn it around, land it, drain it and make it a static display forever. There's one of the Intrepid too but it's been out in the weather and is looking a bit shabby. Cool to peer into the cockpit and see analog gauges.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Military Computer Hacker Proves A Space Force Existed Long Before Donald Trump

 
Top