I think maybe some of his posts have been censored? But, not sure. He's a member here too isn't he...? I thought I saw him here once anyway.
I'm wondering if TPTB at the Paracast forum are taking a different approaching from deleting or editing 'offending' posts but, not sure.
Might be something to run by the “group’s” privacy compliance officer in Denmark :
TechNightOwl.Store
[Re: Privacy Compliance Officer]
Finlandsvej 27, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark
But it’s only partially effective as other replies to deleted threads often still remainI think maybe some of his posts have been censored? But, not sure. He's a member here too isn't he...? I thought I saw him here once anyway.
I'm wondering if TPTB at the Paracast forum are taking a different approaching from deleting or editing 'offending' posts but, not sure.
maybe he got banned .
I think maybe some of his posts have been censored? But, not sure. He's a member here too isn't he...? I thought I saw him here once anyway.
That's one possibility. He did protest loudly when it was speculated on, then when some photos of him in casinos were found, he didn't waste a second deleting them from his Fb account, or some such. His response was not altogether convincing.Is this why he has no money? Gambling?
Ahhh.. gambling would explain a lot. I wonder if dB would confirm?
Jack Brewer did great work. I can only add a small bit of info to confirm that his deal with GCN really doesn’t pay him any money for the ads (or at least it didn’t back when he was first considering it and asked me to give it a look over, and I doubt it’s changed since), other than the few slots they give him to sell himself (and which he seems to give away). At the time, I told him two things: (1) he should hire a practising lawyer to look it over (I haven’t practised in over 25 years), and (2) that you didn’t need a law degree to know that it was a lousy deal. He was too cheap to take my advice on the former, and too desperate to take it on the latter. He was convinced that he would be the next Coast to Coast AM.
Steinberg shows up at the casinos because of those fantastic buffets they offer. The missus isn't capable of cooking a meal.
Thanks, Paul. That's really interesting. It's always good to get the straight scoop from someone who was actually there. Seems the schnorrer is impervious to advice. I always wonder why people like that even ask anyone for their thoughts or opinions when they pay zero attention. That GCN deal has always puzzled me, because as you say it's an obvious stinker.Jack Brewer did great work. I can only add a small bit of info to confirm that his deal with GCN really doesn’t pay him any money for the ads (or at least it didn’t back when he was first considering it and asked me to give it a look over, and I doubt it’s changed since), other than the few slots they give him to sell himself (and which he seems to give away). At the time, I told him two things: (1) he should hire a practising lawyer to look it over (I haven’t practised in over 25 years), and (2) that you didn’t need a law degree to know that it was a lousy deal. He was too cheap to take my advice on the former, and too desperate to take it on the latter. He was convinced that he would be the next Coast to Coast AM.
Paul K posted some good points about the advertising contract with GCN.
however Gene still can get ads of his own. Ads that provide income.
here is two beg mails from last year that show Gene talking about that revenue and the loss of said revenue.
View attachment 5676 View attachment 5677