humanoidlord
ce3 researcher
could be too, knowing the ageThat could be the underside of one of these showing in your image:
could be too, knowing the ageThat could be the underside of one of these showing in your image:
lolJesus, don't make me resort to baby donkeys....
If the crappy McRobert's UFO photo is his best best & most compelling evidence of visitors from another planet visiting the Earth - then he should just give up now & start attending those local UFO meeting groups - the ones with all the nerds & whacko's in them.those are all very weak points, there are more similarities between the objects than differences, we can even use your comparison you did earlier in the thread, the similarity is obvious
anyway i think this case is a dead horse
at least the mcroberts case has a very detailed UFO wich seems to even feature a chair inside the cockpit, so i obviously would take this one more seriously
Here's the complete photo:
And here's an overview of the case:
The Hannah McRoberts UFO Photograph
So I think this might just be the one you've been looking for - a very compelling photo taken by a very credible photographer of a structured craft of unknown origin.
There is actually a huge class of UFO photos, where somebody would be just taking a family holiday photo, ore even just a nice landscape photo (like here) and after processing they spotted an UFO.
The way I see this photo, there is an UFO, lower body of UFO consists of a flat metallic disc and in the top middle there is a transparent dome. Flat metallic disc casts a strong highlight towards the observer, clearly visible only on enlarged photo. On non-enlarged photo highlight misleadingly looks like some flaming exhaust.
Importantly, after considering enlarged photo, one can see that UFO is leaning towards the observer, so that observer's location can be seen from the transparent dome on the top of the metallic disc. That would mean that the UFO crew was aware of the observer's presence and they maneuvered their craft to have a better look.
This type of craft, with flat metallic disc and a transparent dome appears relatively frequently in list of UFO cases. When these UFOs are close enough that faces can be distinguished occupants are described as Nordics, with a thin pure white hair, narrower chins and otherwise completely human athletic bodies. Behavior of these type of crafts and their crews is always very consistent: they come with craft close to the witness, they lean the craft at an angle towards the witness, they establish eye contact with witness and spend few minutes just looking. Then they turn the craft away and leave.
Here is a very well known case from Staffordshire, England, verbally describing more or less the same craft:
And coincidently, another case from British Columbia, Vancuver Island, from New Year's eve in 1970:
The Cowichan Hospital Encounter
Interestingly, two cases with very similar craft happened in the same area Vancouver Island about 11 years apart: Mrs. Hannah McRoberts (aged 25) of Campbell River, British Columbia, was with her family at a rest-area some thirty miles to the north of Kelsey Bay on the east coast of Vancouver Island, from October 8 to 15, 1981.
The problem with your supposition is that people have their eyes looking down texting on their phones rather than ever looking up. A craft could be a few feet away and most humans would never see if let alone snap a photo of one.I would have thought we would have extremely clear high resolution photos/videos by now of extraterrestrial craft.
Everybody has a good camera on them nowadays.
The problem I find is that there is more time spent making and presenting fake photos and videos of UFOs than trying to do actual research. I lose interest when I see an obvious photoshopped pic. I won't waste more of my time trying to pursue it further.
I don't understand what people are trying to do by showing fake videos and photos. Is it some sort of superiority thing? All it does is set back getting to the truth of the matter.
Like I've said 100 times....there are video cameras everywhere. I mean, forget the ones on your iPhones for a minute....I mean just the security cams, dash cams of police cars/civilian cars, surveillance cameras etc. A UFO would have turned up by now. And it's a myth that all the types of cameras I mentioned aren't pointed up. All they have to do is be aimed straight ahead - or they can even be down a little bit. The only thing that matters is that you can see the horizon. Notice all types of other aerial anomalies get captured this way - except of course our friend the flying saucer.I would have thought we would have extremely clear high resolution photos/videos by now of extraterrestrial craft.
Everybody has a good camera on them nowadays.
Like I've said 100 times....there are video cameras everywhere. I mean, forget the ones on your iPhones for a minute....I mean just the security cams, dash cams of police cars/civilian cars, surveillance cameras etc. A UFO would have turned up by now.
Well based on what the reports say - you'd think that it's true. I just went into Google News & typed "UFO" & these are just some of the headlines;amount of alien traffic to our planet, like this is the vacation spot of the milky way galaxy...lol
Precisely. Even a "good" photograph cannot satisfy any reasonable definition of "proof" - an image is only as convincing as the viewer is willing to accept, ideally after studying the case and the resulting image analysis conducted by a credible scientist (in the rare instances when this is done). And even then all one can determine is whether or not the image is anomalous - an image can't tell you where something came from unless it's in a trusted reference book, and obviously by definition that doesn't apply to anything "unidentified."I agree. But I have spent time trying to take pictures of mundane planes and helicopters locally and my iPhone hasn't been the Answer. I don't view pictures and video as conclusive proof, really just a tease.
More than 100 UFOs sightings reported in CT last year
More than 100 UFO sightings were reported in Connecticut last year to the National UFO Reporting Center. The center, based in Davenport, Wash.
Yep. Another example turned up recently when the radar operator in the USS Nimitz CSG case going by the name of Trevor described the close-range gun camera footage that he saw of an intercept attempt, following highly anomalous radar returns that showed a number of targets that cruised south at 100 knots at an altitude of 28K feet - until the jet interceptors approached, and the objects dropped to a position just above the ocean in .78 second. That's an average speed of 24,000 mph. To put that in perspective, the speed of a bullet is about 800 mph - so we're talking about an object that can change position at 30 times the speed of a bullet and then suddenly come to a dead stop and hover mid-air. Trevor described the object in the optical video footage as a disc with a flat bottom and a domed top similar to these other reports and the Hannah McRoberts photo, and he described seeing the object execute seemingly instantaneous leaps between positions on the optical gun camera video.This type of craft, with flat metallic disc and a transparent dome appears relatively frequently in list of UFO cases.
I didn't see much for Connecticut in there.