Gene Steinberg's Financial Shenanigans @ Paracast forums

Obviously they will take whatever riffraff will agree to do the show. Of course Steinberg would have nixed this one if he had been conscious enough to do some reading about that clown, but he really doesn't care. The Scheme Gene & The Pipsqueaks show should be put out of its misery. The two Pipsqueaks between them couldn't carry Chris O'Brien's Rolodex.
 

The shadow

The shadow knows!
You know if Richard Spencer or David Duke saw a UFO I bet both would be ok to come on the show!
 

goblin

Noble
Looking at the now-locked Frank Joseph thread at the Paracast forum, a number of posts by Mohawk and J. Randall Murphy from overnight / this morning have been deleted. Predictably.

I took a screenshot of J. Randall's post earlier, shared here:


...but missed screenshotting his followup where he declared that Mohawk's original post in the thread was akin to "shining a spotlight on them on a stage in an attempt to attack and embarrass" (I'm paraphrasing but only a little). J. Randall Murphy felt that if a friend had mistakenly associated with a Nazi child molester (J. Randall Murphy's own words!) the decent thing to do would be to take the friend aside and quietly point it out to them.

The mind boggles, honestly. This came from the same nitwit who in the same thread only a few posts before proclaimed, "there's always more to the picture than simple black and white conclusions" and "Gene and I are attempting to dig into it, and if possible get another interview with Frank to hear his side of the story" ... "The bigger picture, as is relevant today, may be very different than the superficial persecution we're seeing here."

So from the complicated intellect that is J. Randall Murphy we have that on one hand, on the other hand the insistence pointing out Frank Collins' history and the issues with him in a forum dedicated to discussing the Paracast and that episode specifically is a backhanded attempt at tarring the Paracast. Forget those kids who were molested, or the people of Skokie; you know who the real victim is in all this? Yep, you got it. The guy who can't just admit a mistake, express regret and move forward. The guy who can't handle the least criticism in a moribund forum without losing it.

What really cracks me up about this is I distinctly recall this moral black hole taking offense at his work on the Paracast being referred to as "a hobby". There are far, far more competent and functional podcasters at work out there who acknowledge what they are doing is a hobby. You, J. Randall Murphy, prove this over and over. You're not even bottom of the barrel. Clawing your way up to touch the barrel would represent the achievement of a lifetime for you.
 
Last edited:

GhostofBiedny

Celestial
It's all emblematic of the way that both UTI and Scamberg are completely amoral.

In their typical Orwellian style they have edited the whole thread to try to limit their own reputational damage. The big problem is that these two losers can't help themselves. The reputational damage comes from their consistently unethical behaviour - if they actually had two brain cells to rub together and a willingness to even do basic work they wouldn't end up tying themselves up in these crazy illogical knots.

It is also telling how much UTI is offended if anyone even slightly questions him (just like Gene really). I think he is deeply insecure about his own intellect and indeed his own legitimacy (with good reason) and goes over the top in his responses - again this is something that Gene does too. I suspect this is also why UTI sees no problem with editing what others say to try to make himself look more intelligent.

So as others have said, a simple apology would have been enough and it seems that Gene did at least see the wisdom of attempting this initially but that was too much for UTI - the idea of admitting he was in any way wrong burned him too much. He tried to repaint the whole situation with FJ as the victim and the guy who pointed this all out as some kind of villain. The whole follow up interview line and two sides to the story thing is just beyond belief.

Scamberg then felt emboldened to respond how he really wanted (basically the way he always responds to any criticism no matter how constructive) - with rage towards the guy who pointed this out. Now it has been sanitised too.

It is ironic that the most active thread in recent history for the Paracrud has had to be locked and multiple posts deleted.

Previously I would have said that it would be impossible for a co-host to be bad enough to actually pull Scamberg down further.

- Well the impossible has happened!

It seems two amoral losers really are worse than the sum of their parts.
 
Do we need more proof that Gene reads every word we write here?
Yes, it's hard to imagine anyone else is paying the slightest attention to that mess. Last time I looked at the SchemeGene Fan Club Twitter page, it was moribund. That's appropriate, since it was focused specifically on the begging email "enterprise".
 

wwkirk

Divine
It's all emblematic of the way that both UTI and Scamberg are completely amoral.

In their typical Orwellian style they have edited the whole thread to try to limit their own reputational damage. The big problem is that these two losers can't help themselves. The reputational damage comes from their consistently unethical behaviour - if they actually had two brain cells to rub together and a willingness to even do basic work they wouldn't end up tying themselves up in these crazy illogical knots.

It is also telling how much UTI is offended if anyone even slightly questions him (just like Gene really). I think he is deeply insecure about his own intellect and indeed his own legitimacy (with good reason) and goes over the top in his responses - again this is something that Gene does too. I suspect this is also why UTI sees no problem with editing what others say to try to make himself look more intelligent.

So as others have said, a simple apology would have been enough and it seems that Gene did at least see the wisdom of attempting this initially but that was too much for UTI - the idea of admitting he was in any way wrong burned him too much. He tried to repaint the whole situation with FJ as the victim and the guy who pointed this all out as some kind of villain. The whole follow up interview line and two sides to the story thing is just beyond belief.

Scamberg then felt emboldened to respond how he really wanted (basically the way he always responds to any criticism no matter how constructive) - with rage towards the guy who pointed this out. Now it has been sanitised too.

It is ironic that the most active thread in recent history for the Paracrud has had to be locked and multiple posts deleted.

Previously I would have said that it would be impossible for a co-host to be bad enough to actually pull Scamberg down further.

- Well the impossible has happened!

It seems two amoral losers really are worse than the sum of their parts.
UTI???
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Looking at the now-locked Frank Joseph thread at the Paracast forum, a number of posts by Mohawk and J. Randall Murphy from overnight / this morning have been deleted. Predictably.

I took a screenshot of J. Randall's post earlier, shared here:


...but missed screenshotting his followup where he declared that Mohawk's original post in the thread was akin to "shining a spotlight on them on a stage in an attempt to attack and embarrass" (I'm paraphrasing but only a little).

It looks like those screenshots were all posted beginning here:

Gene Steinberg's Financial Shenanigans @ Paracast forums

@The shadow was posting those early on...

...
 

Wade

Stare..... They are always staring
I've had a UTI and I think I'd prefer that than listening Gene wax poetic about the old guard back in the 50s and 60s
 
Interesting choice of words. Let's look at what "smear campaign" actually means.


"a plan to discredit a public figure by making false or dubious accusations"

So in the bizarre little world of "public figure" Gene Steinberg, publishing court records, quoting Steinberg himself in context, documenting his thousands of begging messages sent to people who made it clear they did not want them, tracking his unethical behavior on his forum, and exposing his blatant lies somehow qualifies as "making false or dubious accusations"? Yeah, that sounds about par for the course.

You lying little worm!
 
Top