Peter Khoury & Hair of an Alien?

nivek

As Above So Below
wow, i always thought he (bill) was the real deal, weird

I don't know his other work, but he is dead wrong on this hair of an alien non-case, the evidence to support that conclusion is filled in this thread, my post in the beginning was from my own research into this case, this hair was/is a human hair...

...
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
He's been flogging it for years and years folks. Horace Drew is was probably the worst person to get involved right? Now Drew is doing crop circles and "messages". Next it will be horoscopes and tarot cards. Seen it all before. What a pair of buffoons.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Here is a review I found for the Hair of the Alien book, he touches on some points I mentioned in the OP...

What happened to the biochemists?
I find it astonishing that one can draw any conclusion that what was found was alien (book title)? The analysis tells us, that this was simply Human DNA. A rare Chinese type DNA and a possible rare Basque/Gaelic type DNA (p77) or this rare Asian Mongoloid DNA (p78 & p224) take your pick. And the author tells us that it is - rare, grafted, CCR5 protein and so on, who said this was rare... it sounds all very human too me. With a population of 1,306,313,812 (July 2005 Ethnic groups - Han Chinese 91.9%, Zhuang, Uygur, Hui, Yi, Tibetan, Miao, Manchu, Mongol, Buyi, Korean, and other nationalities 8.1%) in china today, I can tell you nothing is rare.

The central story is suspended by one miserable thread, for example, how does Chalker identify what is or is not alien hair/DNA? How could you tell unless you took it off a recognised alien to do a match? In fact the hair looks very human too me (see book images).

I am also suspicious when an author tries to anchor or graft their hypothesis onto what seems to be another profession, by a reference or association with that profession. In this case a law and police investigation process. For example Chalker uses the word "Forensic" 70 times. When in fact, Chalker is not trained in Forensic Science nor do we find anyone listed in the book trained in the profession.

Then we have this mystery called "forbidden science" (p67) and the "Invisible college" (p67). Now I can understand the problems that would come about if a scientist steps out on a limb and works outside the mainstream, but in this case Chalker's DNA analysis if processed in an accredited laboratory would be fully backed by that institution, so the need for anyone being put out to burn is redundant, the laboratory would stand by its results, they analysed a "hair sample" that is all, nothing odd about that. But no, Chalker works in a mystery, when in fact the whole process is everyday normal and the need for these mysteries is stupid.

So that brings me to who did the analysis, well from what we can find out.... I don't know? A group called Anomaly Physical Evidence Group (APEG) (p70) did the analysis? Again nothing, not one person or laboratory name, who are these biochemists? So how does the reader verify the credentials of the technical work? Not very forensic to me. And if this was an astonishing discovery, one would expect "Biochemists" would jump on a paper to take the credit. But no... they are going to work through the author (Public face p70), well that's what the author tells us. He even tells us that it is "my APEG team", that is right readers "my"? (p190).

So what was the start point to the Alien Hair find? Well would you believe Khoury, in his own words: "I had a head injury, and I was on a lot of medication" (p23) - Hit on the head! And hit with a shovel or should I say shovels (p24)! Can you find any hints of a prosaic cause, well I can! Then Khoury tells us that he was taking Codeine Phosphate (p24) and as he states "lots". Did you know that one of the side effects of lots of Codeine is hallucinations? But the author does not list any side effects. Then add in Prozac and Voltarin. What happened to the medical reports or even a doctor's name? Nothing, zero, zip.

Forensic my eye, Khoury did his own sample collection and then placed that in a plastic bag (p25), so how did Chalker proved that it came from Khoury's body?

The book does cover other well known cases, my favourite and I would say the best case is the Kelly Cahill encounter (1993) (p50). However, rather than read it in this book, try and find Cahill original book (Encounter, Harper Collins, 1996, ISBN 0732257840), it is very good and worth the effort.

I could go on, but there are too many things to list. I think the author has over stepped his position or qualifications (Chalker is not a biochemist) and tried an interesting form of word association to sell us a weak story that stands on a lot of "Ifs & Buts" around hidden so called APEG mystery biochemists.
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
Whoever penned that review was being to kind. Chalker and his posse made somewhat of an industry out of this fiasco at the time. It was an attention grab from what I was told. Long time ago though. He may have distanced himself from it. What was your take when you spoke to him comparatively recently?
 
Codeine? :wacko8: A dentist gave me a prescription for that once. Thirty little planetoid pills. I took exactly one. The eye-crossing pain was preferable to that trip! Didn't see any aliens though, or even exotic looking women whose presence was a mystery. Nope, just a lot of unpleasant and chaotic sensations in place of the pain, which was still there but somehow disconnected. Weird enough.

So head injury, codeine, and some other powerful shit for good measure. Wow.
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
And thats all it was. A drug-induced, head injury driven brouhaha. There is a reference, or two, that he was with callgirl types too. No wonder there are things on his privates. Then Horace Drew and Chalker turned it into an "alien milieu" now didn't they? I was in an auto accident once. I should have turned it into an alien sage for the ages too.
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
Meant to say "alien saga for the ages..". And a saga it would have been! I'd have Horace Drew hyping my DNA and Bill Chalker writing my book.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Codeine? :wacko8: A dentist gave me a prescription for that once. Thirty little planetoid pills. I took exactly one. The eye-crossing pain was preferable to that trip! Didn't see any aliens though, or even exotic looking women whose presence was a mystery. Nope, just a lot of unpleasant and chaotic sensations in place of the pain, which was still there but somehow disconnected. Weird enough.

So head injury, codeine, and some other powerful shit for good measure. Wow.

Yes and when I spoke to Bill Chalker years ago about that he refused to even consider the trauma and drugs had anything to do with this alleged experience, he was adamant that it was aliens...The OP post has my own search into this case, I found that information and put it together and presented to Bill Chalker, he didn't even bother reading it, he insulted me instead...

...
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
The title of the book is the most deceptive part about this sad, sorry affair. 'Hair of the Alien'. You cant escape it. Even if Chalker and his few fans sort of, kind of, somewhat admit that the DNA may be Chinese, Gaelic, this, or that, the title is designed to gets us all reading with boundless enthusiasm. Chalker and Drew are only good at creating unnecessary mystery. Apparently Chalker is still talking up the story, even now. Drew has moved on to ET soul healing, crop circle design interpretation, and "messages" from the stars.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
ET soul healing lol, geez what a nut...

I thought Bill Chalker may still be pushing the alien hair bit, I've been told he's done some good work in the past, so what happened?...I mean, when I first heard his case and all the details it was clear to me this wasn't an alien or ufo case at all...

...
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
And this stinking stuff from Chalker.. Here he's playing dress ups. Then he flogs a story of a "vision" of an aerial phenomena. Not even a sighting. A "vision". And all from well over 100 years ago. At the end of the day, his Hair of the Alien quagmire, and this stinking old "vision", amount to very little.

 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
Twenty years on and they are still bashing it! Just last year Chalker and Khoury were flogging "transpersonal" and "stressful" encounters with these unearthly "beings". No mention of all the marijuana being smoked. Or the fact that its all explainable despite what DNA "expert" Horrace Drew claims. Or the fact that only alien diehards and the uneducated follow this tale.

 

nivek

As Above So Below
I'm about convinced that Bill Chalker is just in ufology for the money, another scammer that's not much different than Lazar or Goode, by the way he promotes this obvious non story...There was a member here on the forum once called Black Angus who over a year ago got really upset with me because of my views on this case, I told him what I thought of Khoury and Chalker's arrogance when I discussed this case with him almost 10 years ago...Black Angus left the forum because he thought I was the dishonest one because of my views, he truly believed this case is legit, which in reality its far from that...

...
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
I'm about convinced that Bill Chalker is just in ufology for the money, another scammer that's not much different than Lazar or Goode, by the way he promotes this obvious non story...There was a member here on the forum once called Black Angus who over a year ago got really upset with me because of my views on this case, I told him what I thought of Khoury and Chalker's arrogance when I discussed this case with him almost 10 years ago...Black Angus left the forum because he thought I was the dishonest one because of my views, he truly believed this case is legit, which in reality its far from that...

...

Oh there's no question Chalker isnt just a primary researcher. There's always the chance of a dollar here and there. If not money, then just a chance at fame. Never mind about the facts. Of course he's one of so many, and some are far worse. Imagine dealing with the likes of David Wilcox or Corey Goode. Actually, there was a so called "researcher" down under by the name of Stanley Deyo. Even Chalker and his crew wouldn't touch Deyo. He went on to great things: predicting the end of the world, "studying" ancient mayan texts for hints at a planetary "rebirth", pouring over photos of the moon and finding alien bases in every corner... I expected more from Australia to be honest.
 
People have very large emotional investments in certain ideas, which often leads to delusional behavior. None of us is immune to that, but most people have enough sense to give up on wrongheaded nonsense eventually. I see Bill Chalker in that light, as someone who has staked a claim a long time ago, and cannot afford (or at least it would seem to him) to back away from it now. You see it all over the place. George Knapp won't give up on Lazar's bullshit because it's so much of who he is, professionally at least. Stan Friedman went to his grave insisting there was something to the MJ-12 hoax. Racists and xenophobes cling to their irrational fears because they are too cowardly to admit they are wrong. It's stupid. It's counterproductive. It's harmful to everyone. It's also human nature.
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
Turns out Chalker even has a blogsite dedicated to the "alien paradigm" and the "unearthly DNA evidence". This is quite aside from the book, the conference talks, the magazine articles and the other published hype. Its a whole mini-world of ongoing, updating, and rehashing "alien milieu". Its like he really beleives it all. Or he's been long convinced by Khoury and Drew. How can anyone have gotten excited about this? Who published the book? I bet they are cringing now. Without further ado, I present to you the "alien DNA paradigm redux" site. Be sure to leave comments on it. No one else does.

The Alien DNA Paradigm: Alien DNA paradigm redux (1999 - 2014 & ongoing)
 

Trevor Hill

Honorable
What one finds when digging on Facebook; Where to even begin; From what I can gather here, Bill Checkbook Chalker (probably means chequebook) is part of a team of halfbaked researchers called VUFOA in Australia.. But this outfit have detractors who call out false claims or below standard speaking events.. I need to post their shake ups and take downs of Bill and his crew here. Its just too good not to..
 
Top