AATIP, TTSA, AAVs and Exotic Metamaterials

[Thomas R. Morrison]

George Knapp just aired an update on the AATIP; here’s the link:

Exclusive: I-Team obtains some key documents related to Pentagon UFO study

Two new documents have been released to him, which are now freely available to the public.

Here’s the first one – a 2009 letter from Sen. Harry Read to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, where he discusses the objectives and progress of the AATIP, and includes his request and reasons for classifying some key aspects of the program (such as exotic technologies) at the Restricted Special Access Program (SAP) level:

https://media.lasvegasnow.com/nxsgl...letter_2009_1532565293943_49621615_ver1.0.pdf

And we now have the explicit list of 37 scientific papers associated with the AATIP (the last one has been redacted) – I assume that these papers were all funded by the AATIP. There are some fascinating titles in here. I’m particularly interested in the “Antigravity Studies” paper by Dr. Eric Davis, but I see no sign of it online. Lots of other intriguing papers are listed here as well, and some of them are available to the public:

https://media.lasvegasnow.com/nxsgl..._of_studies_1532565541010_49621331_ver1.0.pdf

Still no updates on the mysterious delivery that Mr. Elizondo made to doctors Puthoff and Davis in Austin last month. I figure that it was a sample of the exotic bismuth-magnesium metamaterial that we’ve heard about, coming via Bigelow Aerospace and/or the DoD. But it could also be one of the samples in the possession of Linda Moulton Howe known as “Art’s Parts,” which appear to be related – though to what extent, I have no idea. But it’s interesting that both sources describe the same kind of finely layered metamaterial composed of the same elements. Could the two different samples that have been discussed, come from the same recovery operation? Or are we seeing an indication here that atomically aligned bismuth and magnesium metamaterial is a common feature of an exotic gravitational field propulsion technology that’s employed by a variety of different alien civilizations?

I’m getting ahead of myself, but it’s irresistible to speculate about this. What we need to see is some scientific data, and hopefully empirical confirmation of this mass reduction effect. Because if that’s real, then we could have the key to gravitational field propulsion, as well as the key to a unified field theory. It would absolutely blow my mind if the DoD allowed this kind of finding to reach the public sector, but the hints do seem to point in that direction.

 

[nivek]

I’m particularly interested in the “Antigravity Studies” paper by Dr. Eric Davis, but I see no sign of it online.

Would this be the paper or is it specifically called Antigravity Studies?...

Advanced Propulsion Study

...

 

[Thomas R. Morrison]

Would this be the paper or is it specifically called Antigravity Studies?...

Advanced Propulsion Study

...

That's an earlier (2004) study for the Air Force that covers the whole range of advanced propulsion concepts, which only briefly touches on the concept of antigravity (he provides a nice little summary of Robert Forward's "gravitational dipole generator" concept that we've discussed previously, in that section). The paper on the list is specifically titled "Antigravity Studies," but I don't see it online.

 

[Thomas R. Morrison]

To The Stars Academy announced a research partnership today with EarthTech International (the company of Dr. Puthoff and Dr. Davis) - I wonder if this an indication that they've got some interesting test results to share with us soon...check it out:

"Project ADAM, an acronym for Acquisition & Data Analysis of Materials, will focus on the collection and scientific evaluation of material samples obtained through reliable reports of advanced aerospace vehicles of unknown origin."
To The Stars Academy

And Tom DeLonge posted statement on his Instagram page:

"There are so many exciting things happening right now you guys know it’s hard for me to contain myself from hinting about them to you sometimes. But today I can finally release a few details of one thing that is a major milestone of progress for what I am trying to achieve. We have officially announced our first research program, The ADAM Research Project at @tothestarsacademy and we will be partnering with EarthTech laboratories to conduct the Acquisition & Data Analysis of Materials (ADAM). Our world-class team has already started collecting samples obtained through reliable, vetted reports of advanced aerospace vehicles of unknown origin!! Our goal in the coming weeks is to give you insight into the methodology and care taken into collection and testing so you can follow the process. I couldn’t have done this without your continued support. Check out more details: ToTheStarsAcademy.com"

 

[Jr35rain]

Sounds promising if we get to see results. Could be the real deal if they don't loose the plot.

 

[nivek]

To The Stars Academy announced a research partnership today with EarthTech International (the company of Dr. Puthoff and Dr. Davis) - I wonder if this an indication that they've got some interesting test results to share with us soon...check it out:

"Project ADAM, an acronym for Acquisition & Data Analysis of Materials, will focus on the collection and scientific evaluation of material samples obtained through reliable reports of advanced aerospace vehicles of unknown origin."
To The Stars Academy

And Tom DeLonge posted statement on his Instagram page:

"There are so many exciting things happening right now you guys know it’s hard for me to contain myself from hinting about them to you sometimes. But today I can finally release a few details of one thing that is a major milestone of progress for what I am trying to achieve. We have officially announced our first research program, The ADAM Research Project at @tothestarsacademy and we will be partnering with EarthTech laboratories to conduct the Acquisition & Data Analysis of Materials (ADAM). Our world-class team has already started collecting samples obtained through reliable, vetted reports of advanced aerospace vehicles of unknown origin!! Our goal in the coming weeks is to give you insight into the methodology and care taken into collection and testing so you can follow the process. I couldn’t have done this without your continued support. Check out more details: ToTheStarsAcademy.com"

I've searched the Earth Tech website this afternoon and there is no mention of this project, I would have thought they would note it somewhere if they are in the mist of updating their pages with new information...

...

 

[nivek]

That's an earlier (2004) study for the Air Force that covers the whole range of advanced propulsion concepts, which only briefly touches on the concept of antigravity (he provides a nice little summary of Robert Forward's "gravitational dipole generator" concept that we've discussed previously, in that section). The paper on the list is specifically titled "Antigravity Studies," but I don't see it online.

Here is a listing of his papers, I assume this is a complete list?...

Eric W. Davis - Earth Tech

...

 

[SOUL-DRIFTER]

There has been a lot of talk about what has been recovered(supposedly) by our and other governments over the decades, but frankly I do not think we can duplicate much of it. The materials used may be something we do not have or have the means to duplicate and methods of assembly may be beyond our reach. They surely( the aliens) have an understanding of physics we have no clue on or are just barely scratching the surface of.
I think if anything the recovered devices and materials have helped point us in the right direction of developments and may have hastened others along greatly.

 

[Thomas R. Morrison]

Here is a listing of his papers, I assume this is a complete list?...

Eric W. Davis - Earth Tech
...

Nope, that's not a complete list. I only see one of the Davis papers that are on the AATIP list, on that list. I'm guessing that the three papers which don't show up on his website list, were classified at the Confidential level or higher, before this new AATIP list of papers was released. In fact it could be that only the titles have been declassified for some of these papers at this point, because we still don't have copies of some of these papers in the public sector, not that I can find anyway. Other papers on that list appear to have never been classified, because they're publicly available.

There has been a lot of talk about what has been recovered(supposedly) by our and other governments over the decades, but frankly I do not think we can duplicate much of it. The materials used may be something we do not have or have the means to duplicate and methods of assembly may be beyond our reach. They surely( the aliens) have an understanding of physics we have no clue on or are just barely scratching the surface of.
I think if anything the recovered devices and materials have helped point us in the right direction of developments and may have hastened others along greatly.

A few points:

• Yes the physics is still beyond us: we've never been able to produce a material that measurably loses mass.

• In recent years we've achieved the ability to arrange individual atoms (as we've heard described regarding the exotic photonic metamaterial that they've been talking about). But we've only been able to do so one atom at a time, manually. I doubt that we have the capability to create bulk material with precise atomic ordering, yet. However, if TTSA can demonstrate that this material does represent a genuine new gravitational field technology, industry will race to achieve the requisite production capability, because the potential rewards are vast.

• Again assuming that TTSA has a sample of exotic metamaterial that loses mass under activation with THz radiation, then it's the key to a unified field theory. Because a quantum material that creates gravitational changes represents an embodiment of a unified field theory, by definition. So I would expect such a thing to lead to a radical leap forward in theoretical physics. But that's also why I have so much trouble believing that they're actually in possession of a material that exhibits such a unique and deeply significant effect - it's intelligence value would be incalculable. The military is notorious for withholding everything of any intelligence value - so why would that policy suddenly change?

 

[APIGuy]

Jack Brewer just pointed me to this blog post by Keith Basterfield, who has been doing some of the deepest independent research into AATIP. Basterfield isn't pushing an agenda, he is just trying to help figure out what is really going on.

 

[Thomas R. Morrison]

Jack Brewer just pointed me to this blog post by Keith Basterfield, who has been doing some of the deepest independent research into AATIP. Basterfield isn't pushing an agenda, he is just trying to help figure out what is really going on.

I'm glad to see that somebody's doing this kind of rigorous examination of the most minute details surrounding this story - it's significant, if only for historical record-keeping purposes. But frankly it's incredibly tedious to read through. I zoned out a few times trying to get through it, but from what I gather, he's not seeing any suspicious inconsistencies or subterfuge, although one or two records that he would expect to be available, aren't. But maybe that's what happens when a program becomes a Restricted SAP, which Sen. Reid had requested in that letter.

If you're looking for something a little more mind-blowing, then I suggest a look at today's release of Luis Elizondo's talk at the recent MUFON symposium. There are plenty of show-stopping statements here. But if you've got a gift for reading subtext, I think you'll find this talk to portend some stunning developments to come in the months ahead, so hold onto your hat - Lue begins around 1:07:00 (he talks and at the end answers questions, spanning about 90 minutes altogether):

 

[APIGuy]

George Knapp just aired an update on the AATIP; here’s the link:

Exclusive: I-Team obtains some key documents related to Pentagon UFO study

Two new documents have been released to him, which are now freely available to the public.

And we now have the explicit list of 37 scientific papers associated with the AATIP (the last one has been redacted) – I assume that these papers were all funded by the AATIP. There are some fascinating titles in here. I’m particularly interested in the “Antigravity Studies” paper by Dr. Eric Davis, but I see no sign of it online. Lots of other intriguing papers are listed here as well, and some of them are available to the public:

https://media.lasvegasnow.com/nxsgl..._of_studies_1532565541010_49621331_ver1.0.pdf

I have been going over this list, and so far, am underwhelmed. From what I can tell, there was little or no original work here, and no technology development. I'm pretty sure that only a tiny fraction of the budget went to these reports.

Ok then, where did it go?

 

[Thomas R. Morrison]

Here is a listing of his papers, I assume this is a complete list?...

Eric W. Davis - Earth Tech
...

I just finished listening to Erica Lukes' July 27th interview with Dr. Eric Davis, and near the end of the interview he confirmed that some of his papers, and I assume a few of the others as well, are still classified, at the "For Official Use Only" level, because they's currently being used. Presumably, that use involves current research and development through the DoD.

He also flatly stated that Roswell was an alien crash recovery operation (he also said that bodies were recovered), and said that there were subsequent recovery operations as well, and he reiterated that back-engineering programs have existed for 70 years to exploit alien technology for military applications.

In the last minute or so of the interview, Erica finally got around to asking him about the current research being done on recovered materials in partnership with TTSA, and interestingly, he said that the samples they're examining came to them via civilization cases. I had assumed that they were looking at the photonic metamaterial that we've heard about, and that it had come via Bob Bigelow with DoD approval, but that doesn't seem to be the case. If they are looking at the bismuth and magnesium metamaterial, it would have to be the samples that Linda Moulton Howe has had for years - and that's not encouraging, because those samples are pretty badly melted, which would probably nullify their functionality (assuming that they had one - specifically, the mass reduction effect that Tom DeLonge had mentioned).

 

[Thomas R. Morrison]

I have been going over this list, and so far, am underwhelmed. From what I can tell, there was little or no original work here, and no technology development.

So you think you can determine that from the titles alone? Wow you're good - most scientists need to actually read a paper to know what's in it.

Several of the listed papers are still classified though, so we can't read those. Dr. Davis said that they're classified because they're currently being used for military R&D programs, aka for developing technological applications. That's generally how it works: theoretical papers are the starting point for research and engineering projects - research papers very rarely get into technical specifications.

I'm pretty sure that only a tiny fraction of the budget went to these reports.

Lue Elizondo stated in that MUFON Symposium talk above, that the AATIP could often get academia to generate topical research papers for free, and so they used universities for that whenever possible - one of the many ways they stretched their budget (after the fundamentalist religious zealots with political power intervened to stop them from studying "devil technology," as we just learned in that Erica Lukes interview above with Dr. Eric Davis).

Ok then, where did it go?

Where did what go?

 

[APIGuy]

So you think you can determine that from the titles alone? Wow you're good - most scientists need to actually read a paper to know what's in it.

I don't know why you would think that, and yes I am good, but I am already familiar with some of the related literature, and have done some digging.

Several of the listed papers are still classified though, so we can't read those.

I've seen no evidence of this. With the possible exception of the redacted title, I believe they all correspond closely to research which is already available in the open literature.

 

[Thomas R. Morrison]

I don't know why you would think that, and yes I am good, but I am already familiar with some of the related literature, and have done some digging.

I was being facetious. It's presumptuous to proclaim that any paper is unoriginal, when you haven't even read it yet. Just because you've heard about the general topic of a paper, doesn't mean that the paper itself is devoid of significant original work with regard to that topic.

I've seen no evidence of this.

Are you even reading the other posts in this thread? Eric Davis was just interviewed by Erica Lukes on Friday, and they spoke about this. Dr. Davis said that a number of papers on that newly released list of AATIP papers - including some of his own - remain classified at the "For Official Use Only" level, and he said that this is because those papers have spurred contemporary military research projects. I don't know what more evidence you could expect; he'd know.

With the possible exception of the redacted title, I believe they all correspond closely to research which is already available in the open literature.

That might be true of the unclassified papers which are available to the public, or it might not be - the only way to know is to read them. What's the saying? "Don't judge a book by its cover." Or a paper by its title.

It's probably fair to assume that the best, most useful papers are the ones being withheld. The DoD classifies everything with any value at all, it seems.

 

[APIGuy]

I was being facetious. It's presumptuous to proclaim that any paper is unoriginal, when you haven't even read it yet. Just because you've heard about the general topic of a paper, doesn't mean that the paper itself is devoid of significant original work with regard to that topic.

I made no proclamation whatever. At this point, it is a first impression based on lots of experience. I should point out all the topics in the listed papers have a very substantial open literature - even laser weapons.

Dr. Davis said that a number of papers on that newly released list of AATIP papers - including some of his own - remain classified at the "For Official Use Only" level, and he said that this is because those papers have spurred contemporary military research projects. I don't know what more evidence you could expect; he'd know.

I have dealt with plenty of FOUO information in my own work. It is NOT a classification. You can leave FOUO papers on your desk, show them to uncleared people, and carry them around on your laptop.

Anyway, FOIA requests are in work, and I would bet dollars to donuts I'm right.

 

[Thomas R. Morrison]

I have dealt with plenty of FOUO information in my own work. It is NOT a classification. You can leave FOUO papers on your desk, show them to uncleared people, and carry them around on your laptop.

Anyway, FOIA requests are in work, and I would bet dollars to donuts I'm right.

Well I hope you're right; I want to read them, and the sooner they get published someplace online the sooner I can do that. But Dr. Davis has a security clearance and spoke about this issue explicitly in that Erica Lukes interview last Friday, so I assume that he knows what he's talking about. Perhaps it's simply a matter of people with security clearances being prohibited from sharing "For Official Use Only" documents, and they could be released to the public through the FOIA process. I don't really care, I just want to read them. Until then, I'll read the other papers which are publicly available at this point.

 

[nivek]

Here is the latest post from TTSA website...

The Collection Process

1) What is the importance of gathering materials for general academic research?

We are using scientific analysis to test materials to help unlock their mysteries and answer questions about them, that for many individuals, have lingered for years. In doing so, we collect, isolate, secure, transport and successfully deliver these materials for further scientific analysis, in hopes of determining the following:

• Is the material natural, engineered, or from outside the earth or its atmosphere?
• Is the material ordinary, or does it possess unique properties?
• Is the material potentially part of some greater exotic technology?

We aren’t here to judge anyone or jump to any conclusions. As scientists, we are objective in our approach and will be transparent about our results whatever they may be. The research we are doing is like research the government has been doing for years with taxpayer money. We are doing it with private funds from like-minded individuals who share our interest and curiosity.

2) What is the importance specifically to the evolution of the spacetime metric?

This may contribute to helping answer questions about space-time manipulation and in doing so, challenge or reinforce what we know and observe regarding this phenomena.

3) Where do we find people with materials or how do they find us?

There has been increased awareness of TTS Academy’s mission based on boosted media exposure, scientific/academic lectures, and word of mouth. Because of this, organizations and individuals have reached out to us to evaluate potential exotic materials of unknown origin.

4) Before you retrieve alleged materials, how do you know it’s a credible event? What questions/protocol do you go through to make sure it is legit?

• The credibility of the material is established through an extensive investigation. Each piece of material is treated as official “evidence” and afforded all the same precautions to secure the material.
• In addition, witnesses and sources of the material are categorized according to their placement and access to the material.
• The six fundamental interrogatives (who, what, when, where, how and why) are thoroughly explored in each case and the information is separated among first-hand, second-hand, and hearsay. Once all the evidence is gathered, a final determination is made.

5) Once it is determined material is worth retrieval, what systems are in place to handle the exchange and transportation?

• The material is initially tested for any passive or active electromagnetic, or radioactive emissions, in order to ensure the safety of the field team.
• It is then isolated and thoroughly documented, photographed, measured and recorded, prior to securing each piece in a hardened case, lined with lead foil.
• Hand receipts are provided to the material’s owner and an insurance policy (payable to the material owner) is confirmed prior to departure.
• Due to the potential for the material to be classified as “hazardous material”, all material is then physically driven (utilizing a two-person integrity rule) to the TTS Academy research laboratory at EarthTech International in Austin, Texas.
• Upon arrival, the material is re-inventoried, photographed, and stored in a U.S. Government approved General Services Administration (GSA) security container, and hand receipts are provided.
• The material is then maintained in accordance with the strictest practices of evidence handling and chain of custody per Government directives and recognized best practices.

6) Who owns the materials once in your possession? TTS Academy or the person who originally found them?

All material remains the property of its original owner and must be surrendered upon demand. TTS Academy reserves the right to maintain and test material for the duration of the agreement between both parties. TTS Academy also owns any analysis and media coverage of the material.

.

 

[wwkirk]

Norio is a notorious ETH skeptic, and doesn't cite his sources, but here it is.
UFO community credibility in the toilet – – Alien Metal Alloys Hoax