Aliens Turned Off Nuclear Weapons to Show Us How Useless They Are, Claims UFO Expert

nivek

As Above So Below
Aliens ‘Turned Off Nuclear Weapons’ to Show Us How ‘Useless’ They Are, Claims UFO Expert

As far back as in 2008, a group of former Air Force officers shared their incredible accounts of UFOs allegedly demonstrating a distinct interest in nuclear weapons sites; since then, lobbyists have urged heightened efforts to force the US government to declassify all it knows about extraterrestrials.

Aliens have been turning our nuclear weapons on and off to demonstrate how "useless" they are against them, claims an activist seeking to end the “government ET truth embargo”, reports Daily Star Online.

Stephen Bassett is the founder of Paradigm Research Group (PRG), which has been engaged in a tireless effort to shed light on the “truth” about extraterrestrials and UFOs.

Bassett claims that several witnesses have observed Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, as he calls them, in line with the US Navy's official definition, manipulating our own nuclear weapons with ease and even "turning them off".

However, the expert is quick to downplay any fears that this constitutes a threat to humanity, saying this actually shows us that ETs and Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) support nuclear disarmament.

“They turned off our nuclear weapons repeatedly; does that mean they are bad? The witnesses to the events, and there are many, generally believe that it is not an ominous thing but rather a message."

Bassett continues:

“It wasn’t a threat but a message that these things are useless. [As if they're saying] “they certainly are useless against us, all you are going to do is kill yourselves and we can’t turn them off at will, why don’t you just get rid of them?” That’s how the witnesses, by and large the majority, have interpreted this.””

This is by far not the first time it has been claimed that aliens have been shutting down nukes and showing an interest in military bases.

Former US Air Force lieutenant Bob Jacobs was one of a group of former Air Force officers, that also included Robert Salas, who appeared back in 2008 on CNN’s Larry King Live to make the claim that UFOs activated missile systems at five Air Force Bases in five different states, but the United States government had reportedly covered up the information.

Bob Salas, a former US Air Force captain, and Bob Jamison, a former US Air Force officer, made the sensational claim that during a missile test, an object “shot a beam of light at the warhead” in what has been called the 1967 Malmstrom AFB UFO incident, when missiles in the middle of Montana were reportedly rendered temporarily inoperable.


“The Air Force investigated this secretly, I believe through 1972. I think this thing was not of this Earth. I’m convinced it was not built here, because it was able to send signals to each of our missiles separately. The guidance and control equipment was upset in each one,” said Salas.

He was asked, he says, by commanders to sign a non-disclosure document in which he pledged to never talk about the incident.

Bob Jacobs, former US Air Force photographic instrumentation officer, claimed a UFO showed up on film that he shot in 1954 at Vandenberg Air Force Base and that was later confiscated by CIA agents.

Stephen Bassett previously told Daily Star Online that NASA is forced by the US government to shut down the ISS live feed when aliens put in an appearance.

Bassett, who has long campaigned for the government to end its alleged embargo on the truth about extraterrestrial life, recently claimed that NASA essentially has its "hands tied" when it comes to concealing UFO appearances.

The executive director of Paradigm Research Group, founded in 1996, Bassett has been working to end what he claims is a government-imposed embargo on the truth behind the so-called "UFO" phenomenon.

.
 

michael59

Celestial
Stephen Bassett previously told Daily Star Online that NASA is forced by the US government to shut down the ISS live feed when aliens put in an appearance.

Why does NASA have to answer to the US government? They're not in the USA, they're in earths orbit. The US government does not own earths orbit. So what happens if they don't cut the feed? They get closed/shut down?

Stephen Bassett's comment is more interesting than the article itself. lol

I appreciate the article, but to be clear I am not an "alien hunter." ET's are here and "hunting" them is not a good idea. They would be a formidable prey, which is to say, it would not go well. What is that some say? The truth shall set you free. Or one I use alot, truth is the antidote to fear. We pursue the truth from the United States government - the end to the truth embargo. #Disclosure

I don't think hunting them would work at all. We don't have the "skills" lol

This is what I believe to be the truth. I don't think they made any agreement with the government in exchange for technology. I think they said, if you let us study and experiment on whatever we choose, without interference. We, in return, will allow you to continue to walk around like you still actually own the place.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
This is what I believe to be the truth. I don't think they made any agreement with the government in exchange for technology. I think they said, if you let us study and experiment on whatever we choose, without interference. We, in return, will allow you to continue to walk around like you still actually own the place.

I tend to agree, I doubt any aliens would give us technology if our governments were in communication with them, we have nothing to offer them, except ourselves, which they seem to be able to take any one of us they want...Why would they make any deal with our government, they have the technology and ability to do anything they want, we cannot stop them...

...
 
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is an agency of the US federal government. The government owns NASA. The government funds NASA. The ISS is not NASA, but NASA is one of the owners of the ISS and certainly controls the communication between Houston and the ISS. That's no different than the "US government" controlling the communications between a US Navy aircraft carrier in a port in, say, Japan and the Pentagon or wherever.
 

Sheltie

Fratty and out of touch.
I tend to agree, I doubt any aliens would give us technology if our governments were in communication with them, we have nothing to offer them, except ourselves, which they seem to be able to take any one of us they want...Why would they make any deal with our government, they have the technology and ability to do anything they want, we cannot stop them...

...
There are many in the UFO community, such as Charles Hall, who believe the US govt and probably the govts of many other nations have been secretly working with aliens by offering them valuable natural resources for technology.

Whether they admit it or not, the US military has come to accept the fact that alien visitations are both real and unstoppable. I believe the protocol for dealing with alien visitors changed after the Mantell Encounter in 1948. It became apparent that our weapons are useless and only serve to make alien observers angry and possibly violent.
 

michael59

Celestial
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is an agency of the US federal government. The government owns NASA. The government funds NASA. The ISS is not NASA, but NASA is one of the owners of the ISS and certainly controls the communication between Houston and the ISS. That's no different than the "US government" controlling the communications between a US Navy aircraft carrier in a port in, say, Japan and the Pentagon or wherever.

Wish I could say I'm surprised by that.

Who else owns ISS?
 
I tried for a few minutes to hunt down the details of ISS ownership but it just gets glossed over. It was my understanding when it was being built that it was primarily a NASA project, and I'm sure NASA is still the Alpha agency when you get right down to brass tacks (of which there surely are none in the space station). I'm also sure the reason the facts and figures remain buried in historical documents is that it's a model of international cooperation in a very expensive endeavor, and pissing contests about who spent the most money would be counterproductive. Its mission is overwhelmingly scientific, though I'm sure there are some aspects that are not.

Anyway, from Wikipedia:

The International Space Station (ISS) is a space station (habitable artificial satellite) in low Earth orbit. The ISS programme is a joint project between five participating space agencies: NASA (United States), Roscosmos (Russia), JAXA (Japan), ESA (Europe), and CSA (Canada).[6][7] The ownership and use of the space station is established by intergovernmental treaties and agreements.[8]

International Space Station - Wikipedia
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
I believe the protocol for dealing with alien visitors changed after the Mantell Encounter in 1948.

Just happened to have a copy of The Report on Unidentified Objects on my desktop and below is what Capt. Ruppelt had to say about it writing only a couple of years after the incident. He was much closer to the event and the people involved and actually investigated it. There's more to it if you want to read it, I attached the book.

To me it sounded like he was too high for too long and passed out because of target fixation. Dive bomber pilots used to get fixated and fail to pull out, fighter pilots often got themselves killed by other fighter pilots who weren't overly focused and had better situation awareness.

The Mantell Incident is the same old UFO jigsaw puzzle. By assuming the shape of one
piece, a balloon launched from southwestern Ohio, the whole picture neatly falls together.
It shows a huge balloon that Captain Thomas Mantell died trying to reach. He didn't know
that he was chasing a balloon because he had never heard of a huge, 100-foot-diameter
Skyhook balloon, let alone seen one. Leave out the one piece of the jigsaw puzzle and the
picture is a UFO, "metallic and tremendous in size."
It could have been a balloon. This is the answer I phoned back to the Pentagon.
34/190
 

Attachments

  • The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by Edward J. Ruppelt - 1956.pdf
    1.2 MB · Views: 111

nivek

As Above So Below
I tried for a few minutes to hunt down the details of ISS ownership but it just gets glossed over.

I did find this bit, so it appears to be a conglomeration with each responsible for their own parts of the whole?...

Who owns the International Space Station?

The Intergovernmental Agreement allows the Space Station Partners States to extend their national jurisdiction in outer space, so the elements they provide (e.g. laboratories) are assimilated to the territories of the Partners States.

The basic rule is that 'each partner shall retain jurisdiction and control over the elements it registers and over personnel in or on the Space Station who are its nationals' (Article 5 of the Intergovernmental Agreement).

This means that the owners of the Space Station - the United States, Russia, the European Partner, Japan and Canada - are legally responsible for the respective elements they provide. The European States are being treated as one homogenous entity, called the European Partner on the Space Station. But any of the European States may extend their respective national laws and regulations to the European elements, equipment and personnel.

This extension of national jurisdiction determines what laws are applicable for activities occurring on a Partner’s Space Station elements (e.g. European law in the European Columbus Laboratory). This legal regime recognises the jurisdiction of the Partner States’s courts and allows the application of national laws in such areas as criminal matters, liability issues, and protection of intellectual property rights. Any conflicts of jurisdiction between the Partners may be resolved through the application of other rules and procedures already developed nationally and internationally.


.
 

1963

Noble
Thanks to JG and the Black Vault Here is another "UFO visits Nuclear Facility" story that I doubt even Robert Hastings has come across yet ... it involves "A bullet shaped object with a ribbon tail about 4-6 feet long hovering just a few feet above ground near the main gate of the AEC, and seemingly 'growing in size' as it crossed the perimeter fence and then shooting off when approached "! ...
It occurred when the now inactive United States Air Force organization was conducting an air defence alert capability test, which was conducted on October 17th, 1950, where various radar sets were tested. ... and somehow wasn't included in Bluebook.


3-18-2021-5-44-17-AM.jpg


Documentation... October 15, 1950, UFO Encounter at the Atomic Energy Commission Station 47 - The Black Vault
00464278.pdf (theblackvault.com)

R28fbb73b12bcc10a984ff5f0926e6059


Cheers.
 
Top