Discussion in 'Cryptozoology' started by nivek, Jan 29, 2017.
‘Compelling’ video of 'bigfoot family’ at Yellowstone divides web
Thinker Thunker has examined this on YouTube.Comes up with interesting points!
I get the message “This video is unavailable.”
Same here.....would be nice to see.
I went to YouTube to watch it.
It was a good while since I watched it.The main points he made were that they moved faster than people could,especially given the conditions and that they were bigger by far,especially the one at the front than any human.
Just checked YouTube.Type in Thinker Thunker and the video is Bigfoot v Buffalo.
I fixed the OP video...
These people who film these sort of "events" really need to invest in some proper camera equipment.
In this day and age of 4K video seriously that what we have to look at?
I also wish they would get the terms correct. Bison are from the Americas and buffalo are from Asia.
sorry guys, those are normal humans, their size is a optical illusion, and visitors are permitted to go there
What do you think they were doing? They were sitting down in the snow and looked like they were examining something. Was it some kind of natural food or mineral that they were seeking?
I don't think they were "normal humans" so what if people are allowed to go there. It looks like the video was taken in late afternoon, just before darkness sets in. Maybe they (Big Foot) go there when they know/think no one else will be around. Maybe it's the only location where whatever it was they were looking at/for can be found?
I do not agree with that opinion, just because visitors are allowed in that area does not mean those are human visitors...Animals are allowed in that area too, so are bigfoot...
Yeah but Bison Bill doesn't have the same impact.
occam's razor and all that
True......but I was going by their movements.
Typical skeptical approach without any research or investigation into the subject...Negating for the sake of negating...
i exposed the reasons for my comment earlier
Ok. Enough lurking. First post on AE. Love this stuff. Slightly bored too.
Fascinating story but more eyewitness testimony and blurry footage isn’t going to change anything. My first thought is that if I did see a family of …. whatever those were …. wouldn’t that have been the time to go examine the area they were in for sign? Fur, scat, reeeeaaallly big footprints? That might have added a bit of weight to the argument.
Realistically though, if I saw that sort of thing you could pick about any heading you like but toward them probably wouldn’t be it for me unless I saw someone’s sneakers peeking out from under a suit.
Hi Pigfarmer.Good to see you here,I'm sure you'll be a valuable contributor.
Separate names with a comma.