Chemtrail: Conspiracy theory or truth?

humanoidlord

humanoidlord

ce3 researcher
s
Zeke said:
There's footage from LBJ (1960s) talking about controlling the weather through geoengineering.

Recently (2016?) John Brennan talked about this as a method to counter climate change/global warming by reflecting sunlight.

The fucktards at metajunk think they "debunked" the story. I suspect these have been black project/budget operations going back several decades. I'm not sure when they started doing specific nano-sized metalic particles that geoengineering watch groups claim exist.

They show and interview people with wierd fiber-glass material coming out of their skin and also getting sick after these "contrails" in their general area. While it's true the air stream and other factors would not allow them fall straight down if they are being sprayed. By "sprayed" we mean a number of ways I posted before. There could be a host of experimental ways which they could have this without public knowledge. They perfected the method(s) and now rolling over the black project(s) into the public corporate side and according to the "Frankeskies" documentary producer - gmo agricultural related companies.

The cover excuse (one legit purpose) of geoengineering is the reflecing sunlight, but he proposes even further gmo related business and global control of the food supply ventures. Now with ocean accidifcation from extra carbon release and other climate change factors, they want to "introduce" this concept as a way to "save the planet" they helped create the problem in the first place.

When exactly these things started? I don't know.



Here's how I got interested in this subject. Only about 2 years ago I went into a 7-11 and looked up at the sky. I noticed strange contrails all over that didn't look right. Yes we have lots of airports nearby and planes go by, and I'm aware of contrail drifting to form patterns.. I asked a local guy what's the deal and he said that this happens periodically depending on certain weather conditions. He thinks its the "chemtrails" etc.

So... I googled this. I was led to no other than, our dis-info agent Mick West and his charts on megajunk.com. I looked over his forum and found that the ONLY WAY to show such things are real and directly linked to what's happening on the ground and in people, is by capturing the very contrail, then taking it for analysis.

I looked if someone tried this. I found a German investigator who did try this very thing. He rented out a plane so he can capture the contrails and study them. What we found first try was "inconclusive". He wanted and needed to go HIGHER in the stratosphere. He had INFORM the sky controllers (government agency). Thus, this experiment had a flaw. It was not random. It gave a heads-up to anyone who, had they been part of any geoengineering program, would be able to not do their runs that day when the investigation would take place. So conclusion, there is NO WAY to prove these things are taking place or satisfactory to skeptics.

Watch OVERCAST-an investigation into climate engineering Online | Vimeo On Demand
Click to expand...

still no conclusive evidence
 
humanoidlord

humanoidlord

ce3 researcher
p
Zeke said:
Another kicker. Ready for this?

The scientist working with the Overcast film maker, could not get the samples studied properly at any US lab.. they seem to not do it.. he had to resort to using a special blood separation machine. The details are in the film.

If you have some 21 trillion dollars to work with and unlimited spying/satellite surveillance of space and skies, you pretty much can get away with anything.
Click to expand...
probally they did the text and found nothing
 
D

Dundee

Fading day by day.
There must be 1000's of places, private labs, universities, even private citizens that are capable of analyzing samples and detecting higher than normal levels of chemicals. Yet where is the evidence that firstly anything was found, and secondly it is as a result of intentional chem-trails, as compared to perhaps factory pollutants or similar. In an earlier post it was mentioned that someone did in fact take samples from a contrail but the results were inconclusive. This is just another way of saying he found nothing. If the person taking the sample found a nano-gram of anything that should not be there I am certain they would have cried foul. As for the earlier post about cloud seeding to control weather, yes we all know that this took place back in the day. But primitive attempts to make it rain are a far cry from the supposed chem-trail theory. I just can't see the conspiracy here.
Like I have always said, if any government wanted to administer chemicals to the people, there are lots of better ways to do it than out of the back of a commercial plane over a city in broad daylight on some sunny Sunday afternoon. It just makes no sense to me it all. Contrails YES, Chem-trails NO
 
Castle-Yankee54

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
Dundee said:
There must be 1000's of places, private labs, universities, even private citizens that are capable of analyzing samples and detecting higher than normal levels of chemicals.
Click to expand...

Yes there are......and there are thousands that can find things in the part per billion range. Some can even test for things in the parts per trillion range. Some contaminants are measured in picometers. which are smaller than nano particles......but laboratory analytical reports are not reported in such manners. The are reported in parts per million and parts per billion and some times parts per trillion. How ever they are reported in mg/Kg or ug/Kg for soil & mg/L or ug/L in water.....the size of the compounds or elements are not reported.
 
nivek

nivek

As Above So Below
Castle-Yankee54 said:
It is flawed.......but paranoiacs are quite abundant.
Click to expand...

Well although I don't buy into this notion of chemtrail spraying, places like metabunk uses flawed logic to defend their position and reasonings...
 
Area201

Area201

cold fusion
nivek said:
You haven't heard of Mike West in your years of discussing chemtrails?...
Click to expand...

I think it's Mick West, but yeah I'm surprised he hasn't either. It pops up front page when I googled the subject a while back. He was on Joe Rogan Experience. He's a skeptics darling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top