Confirmed: Navy's previously unreported 2019 Triangle UFO incident

nivek

As Above So Below
Confirmed: Navy's previously unreported 2019 Triangle UFO incident
By Tom Rogan

On Wednesday, The Debrief’s Tim McMillan gave us the most detailed look yet at the Pentagon’s ongoing research of unidentified flying objects, UFOs, or what the government refers to as “unidentified aerial phenomena.” Publicly announced earlier this year, the “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force” is run out of the Office of Naval Intelligence. Its mission is to detect, analyze, and catalog UFOs.

I can confirm the accuracy of McMillan’s story, the previously unreported Navy UFO encounter in late 2019, and his description of task force intelligence reports from 2018 and 2020. And that the government has been unable to positively identify the UFOs recorded on video by naval aviators in 2004 and 2015. Those videos were first published in a 2017 New York Times article and officially released by the Navy this year.

But that’s just the start.

McMillan correctly notes that the 2018 task force report “expressly stated that the potential for UAP to be ‘alien’ or ‘non-human’ technology was of legitimate consideration.” That report included photos taken by naval aviators on their personal cellphone cameras, which appear to show a cube-like UFO of the kind aviators described in the 2015 video-recorded incident.

It is the 2020 report, however, which is most striking. Shared very widely across the civilian and military intelligence community, it includes an extraordinary photograph taken in late 2019 of a triangle-shaped UFO. The photograph was taken by a F/A-18F fighter jet operating off the U.S. East Coast. According to the report, the Triangle UFO rose out of the Atlantic Ocean and rapidly accelerated out of sight on a vertical axis. I believe, but have been unable to confirm, that the aircrew responsible for the photo were operating off either the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower or the USS John C. Stennis.

This is big news, or should be, for four reasons.

First, it confirms the ongoing presence of UFOs proximate to the Navy’s nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. These UFOs are apparently powered by unconventional non-jet based flight propulsion systems, exhibiting no exhaust trails, and are capable of rapidly navigating water, air, and space. No nation or corporation has been shown to possess, let alone manifest, such advanced engineering. As an extension, the reports reinforce the classified assessment that there is an unknown connection between naval nuclear reactors and proximate UFO activity.

Third, the previously unreported Triangle UFO incident adds a third design form to the portfolio of “Tic-Tac” and “Cube” form UFOs seen by naval aviators in 2004 and 2015. It’s worth noting here that triangle-shaped UFOs closely matching the one referenced in the 2020 report have been reported by witnesses in U.S. airspace for many decades.

Finally, the 2020 report carried a heavy focus on underwater operating UFOs, or what the government calls “Unidentified Submersible Phenomena.” McMillan rightly notes that the Navy is particularly loath to discuss this element of the phenomenon, fearing that doing so will compromise the operation of highly classified Navy acoustic sensor networks. As I’ve reported, another motive for the government’s secrecy here is the apparent ability of some UFOs to travel underwater at speeds of hundreds of knots or more per hour. Combining that factor with the UFOs' means of and apparent propensity for occasionally closing with nuclear-powered submarines has the Navy reasonably concerned.

Namely, that the silent service isn’t running as silent as the admirals would like to admit. And that China or Russia must not be able to replicate this technology. Such a development would shred the credibility and very function of U.S. nuclear deterrent forces, of which ballistic missile submarines are supposed to be the most survivable linchpin. In turn, and in a noticeable distinction with the record-report approach of its surface warfare colleagues, the submarine force prefers to write off undersea sensor detections as anomalies (as I found during a June interview with the admiral commanding U.S. submarine forces).

Where does this leave us?

As usual for this subject, with many more questions than answers.

But we should welcome the intelligence community’s effort to share UFO-related reporting more widely. And we should support efforts, such as that of Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Marco Rubio, to declassify more UFO-related reporting.


.
 
Top