magical in the sense it defies the laws of natureI would ask again why you use the word 'magical'..? That's a subjective interpretation.
But the bigfoot sightings in conjunction with ufos are few and far between and not well documented...as are the alleged ufo sightings at Loch Ness.
And only a few ufos were seen in the Mothman case with Keel in 1966 and I know of few others that are well documented.
I place most of that material in the very grey basket.
So-called paranormal events have happened in some ufo cases both before and after sightings. To ascribe magical to them is an interpretive problem. Again we don't know what it represents and there is no reason to assume it's magical as in the strict meaning of the word.
me tooI find myself agreeing with Wu a lot in this thread.
'Magical in the sense of defying the laws of nature'.....I can see why someone would interpret it in that way in some of the high strangeness cases. But I would add that perhaps we don't have a thorough handle on how all the 'laws of nature' work.magical in the sense it defies the laws of nature
there have been a lot of sightings of hairy naked men exiting ufos, not many nowdays but an lot during the golden age of the humanoids (50's to 70's)
there also have been sightings of anomalous black cats and ghosts in the loch ness, it seems we are dealing with an hotspot of .... something
there were an modest number of ufo sightings relationed to mothman
again i am talking magical in the sense of nature defying
yeah we dont know, though we have more or less a grasp of the laws'Magical in the sense of defying the laws of nature'.....I can see why someone would interpret it in that way in some of the high strangeness cases. But I would add that perhaps we don't have a thorough handle on how all the 'laws of nature' work.
I have read many ufo books over the last 40 years,,,there aren't many cases of bigfoot or hairy apes in conjunction with ufos, though I will say that the early cases of 'humanoids' in the 50 and 60's and even some earlier reports are certainly weird and entertaining. What I find interesting is that many or most of the early cases the 'aliens' looked a lot like us (or like small Asian people)...only later as time went by did they start to look like 'grey aliens'. Did the 'aliens' visiting earth suddenly shift or is something else going on?
The Loch Ness events are interesting on multiple levels and many strange things have been 'seen ' there including UFO's, other weird beings and creatures, and Men In Black also. BTW Aleister Crowley, the occultist., had a cottage on or near the lake which was also owned for a while by Jimmy Page from Led Zeppelin.
Again the only ufo events I know of connected to 'Mothman' was in the Point Pleasant VA cases that Keel wrote about.
A very fun read but as a writer Keel had a way of embellishing his stories.
The house at the Loch.....
Boleskine House - Wikipedia
Do you have a good link to the Chicago Mothman cases and any pics...? I'll Google to see what I can find.yeah we dont know, though we have more or less a grasp of the laws
i noticed that too, what happened to the original humanoids? why were they replaced by those boring weirdos?
oh yes boleskine house, i had forgot about that little tale
recently the mothman is being seen again in chicago and one of the sightings reported an odd green light along with him
the website phamtoms and monsters run by lon strickler is source number 1 for this stuffDo you have a good link to the Chicago Mothman cases and any pics...? I'll Google to see what I can find.
what happened to the original humanoids?
nope, i am talking about the original UFOnauts, those funny astronaut suited men that greeted random men in the country side, they were replaced by the dull and robotic graysWhat do you mean by original humanoids?...Before humans?...
...
nope, i am talking about the original UFOnauts, those funny astronaut suited men that greeted random men in the country side, they were replaced by the dull and robotic grays
that statament has debunked so many times its not even funny anymoreThat's because we stopped detonating nuclear devices all the time...
...
the number of sentient beings in the universe with nuclear capability probally grows each day
and the explosive nuclear waves will be very hard to detect the time they arrive to a civilization
nuclear devices aren't that hard to build, once you know what radiation is, the rest is easyNot at all, not every species is going to follow the same development, many will not even design much less build nuclear devices...
so you are talking about what?What is a nuclear wave?...I'm not talking about physical detection...
nuclear devices aren't that hard to build, once you know what radiation is, the rest is easy
so you are talking about what?
sentience is a evolutionary trait caused by predator behaviour, a good amount of the sentient races are warmongersThey are not hard to build but not every species is going to do it, I doubt every species develops through a warlike era or kills one another like we do...
never heard of that and i don't think its possibleNuclear detonation rips through certain frequencies and these can be detected rom vast distances and through dimensions especially when advanced technology makes use of those frequencies...
never heard of that and i don't think its possible
there are so many things happening in this and other universes, that eventually the signal gets muddledJust because you haven't heard it doesn't mean its bunk...There are many things going on you know nothing about, same goes for me...You might learn something new...
...
there are so many things happening in this and other universes, that eventually the signal gets muddled
its a fact, there are many habitable planets and even non-habitable ones have a lot of stuff going onNow you're grasping for straws, guessing, you don't know that for sure...
...