Shadowprophet
Truthiness
I may be as crazy as a stoned pack of looney toons but the constant to that is Science is my Rock. Science is a Logical and Empirical foundation I base my sanity upon, It keeps me grounded.
So we are going with Relativity here and even so, Some people could disapprove, the fact remains, Relativity at its current iteration seems to be the way the universe functions, Now people can disagree with that and bring some Quantum physics to the table, However, For peer review, no one can beat relativity for round table support of a theoretical model. So, Spacetime for the sake of this example is a literal empirical fact. we could argue that Said tablecloth is Red and Not burgundy or we could both just accept it's a table cloth and move on with the discussion. I've spent the last Twenty years of my life trying to intimately understand time, I haven't sat on my ass either. Okay okay okay, Enough of that introduction shit, I've got a point to get too.
Spacetime, We know that Space and time are their own Dimension. I've been running this same model of universal expansion in my mind for years, As the universe expands we are hurtling through the cosmos 74.3 kilometers per second, Now this is debatable, But the metric I'm using is called the Hubble constant. "Which is also debatable--- but hey, to finish a thought one has to make choices and progress the narrative.
Anyway, Most people would agree, No matter what metric you use to measure the expansion rate, That's pretty damned fast.
Let's talk about some Laws of motion real quick, As Mass accelerates that acceleration is cumulative energy which does make an object denser. Denser objects have greater gravity, As mass approaches the speed of light, It hits a threshold in which its energy becomes so great it hits a critical mass and thus, All physical matter is consumed by the overwhelming energy.
But, What if the universe was Static, What if the universe wasn't expanding. For that matter what if the universe wasn't in motion at all, What if galaxies didn't rotate what if solar systems stood still, What if the universe was a completely stationary thing, There would be no acceleration, So surely energy and mass itself would at the very least be affected on some incalculable level through the entire cosmos. If an object's mass is affected, we know then that its gravity, and thereby it affects on spacetime would be radically changed.
This brings me to two thoughts. Either The acceleration of the universe is directly affecting gravity, And Thus time itself. Or, Without the acceleration of the Cosmos Time would simply cease to exist. I don't know, Nobody wants to get caught talking to the crazy Guy, but, that's okay. sometimes I don't want to talk to myself either :/
So we are going with Relativity here and even so, Some people could disapprove, the fact remains, Relativity at its current iteration seems to be the way the universe functions, Now people can disagree with that and bring some Quantum physics to the table, However, For peer review, no one can beat relativity for round table support of a theoretical model. So, Spacetime for the sake of this example is a literal empirical fact. we could argue that Said tablecloth is Red and Not burgundy or we could both just accept it's a table cloth and move on with the discussion. I've spent the last Twenty years of my life trying to intimately understand time, I haven't sat on my ass either. Okay okay okay, Enough of that introduction shit, I've got a point to get too.
Spacetime, We know that Space and time are their own Dimension. I've been running this same model of universal expansion in my mind for years, As the universe expands we are hurtling through the cosmos 74.3 kilometers per second, Now this is debatable, But the metric I'm using is called the Hubble constant. "Which is also debatable--- but hey, to finish a thought one has to make choices and progress the narrative.
Anyway, Most people would agree, No matter what metric you use to measure the expansion rate, That's pretty damned fast.
Let's talk about some Laws of motion real quick, As Mass accelerates that acceleration is cumulative energy which does make an object denser. Denser objects have greater gravity, As mass approaches the speed of light, It hits a threshold in which its energy becomes so great it hits a critical mass and thus, All physical matter is consumed by the overwhelming energy.
But, What if the universe was Static, What if the universe wasn't expanding. For that matter what if the universe wasn't in motion at all, What if galaxies didn't rotate what if solar systems stood still, What if the universe was a completely stationary thing, There would be no acceleration, So surely energy and mass itself would at the very least be affected on some incalculable level through the entire cosmos. If an object's mass is affected, we know then that its gravity, and thereby it affects on spacetime would be radically changed.
This brings me to two thoughts. Either The acceleration of the universe is directly affecting gravity, And Thus time itself. Or, Without the acceleration of the Cosmos Time would simply cease to exist. I don't know, Nobody wants to get caught talking to the crazy Guy, but, that's okay. sometimes I don't want to talk to myself either :/
Last edited: