you must get pretty easily amazed, that was just dramatic narrating
No, he was making an excellent point. And I didn’t say that I was amazed, I said that it was pretty awesome – those two expressions aren’t synonymous in modern parlance.
Being the former 10-year Director of an official Pentagon program to investigate and scientifically analyze the AAV phenomenon who came out to tell us that these devices are real, exhibit five signature performance characteristics, and aren’t terrestrial in origin, by definition makes him the walking and talking embodiment of government disclosure.
nothing really suspicious here, ramey cleared the confusion to them
It took a General to identify a weather balloon? Do you even listen to yourself? Name one other occasion when a General was required to publicly “clear up the confusion” surrounding any mundane situation. It doesn’t happen; that’s what peons are for. Which makes it an anomaly aka suspicious. It makes much more sense to conclude that a General took command of the situation because it was far more important than a balloon, and that the balloon explanation was the cover story that he came up with. I mean, seriously - for anyone to mistake a balloon for a crashed flying saucer, they'd have to be so out of it that drool would be flowing from their mouths as they awaited their next Thorazine injection. And given that Colonel Blanchard rose to the rank of four-star General, it's safe to say that he wasn't a drooling moron.
we have already proved they aren't human in origin, but alien is the most cliched and overdone of the explanations and it has only lead to dead ends
You mean “it’s the most obvious and totally rational scientific explanation.” I’d agree with that.
Much better than the “supernatural invisible omnipotent entity” idea, which is basically Dark Ages thinking, synonymous with “angels,” “devils,” “gods,” and “faeries.”
As for “dead ends,” explain how the extradimensional ultraterrestrial idea is not a dead end. It doesn’t even make rational sense. And it certainly hasn't provided any answers - in fact it only raises more problems, like "how can it be physically possible to have higher macroscopic dimensions for such a being to reside in, without violating the known laws of physics?" And "how could it be possible for a being to manifest physical objects that defy inertia through the power of sheer thought without violating the conservation of energy and the conservation of momentum?" And "how could another sentient entity have evolved on Earth without leaving any trace of its existence in the geological record?"
soooo.... you just proved my point?
No, you missed the point. I’ll try to make it simpler for you: all that it takes to make gullible people believe that a story is fake, is to have a known liar like Doty advocate it.
That doesn’t make the story untrue. It only gives people like yourself an easy excuse to dismiss it. Which is the whole point of a PsyOp. Which we know Doty has engaged in professionally.
everyone tells me that and i just shake my head
The conceit required to shake your head at all of the evidence, from the eyewitness testimony of top fighter pilots and aerospace scientists and soforth, to the trace evidence cases, to the radar and optical data, to the wealth of scientific data supporting the prevalence of habitable exosolar worlds, to the theoretical physics of metric propulsion systems…just blows my mind. Flat-Earthers are in the same category: in their minds, everyone is wrong except for themselves. I think psychiatrists call that "delusional."
Let’s see where we are in one year, and then see if you’re still shaking your head, or hanging it in shame for believing in a supernatural god-like trickster entity that’s masquerading as advanced technological devices from other star systems, by imponderable means and for inexplicable reasons.
We already have the testimony of the former Pentagon Director and two of our top fighter pilots and the radar operators and the scientists who conducted the analyses, stating that we’re dealing with advanced technological devices of nonterrestrial origin. And we have over 70 years of reports that clearly point to exotic technology, not supernatural forces. I find all of that far more persuasive than the steeply biased opinion of some anonymous guy on the internet. And I suspect that the ADAM Project will provide material evidence sometime in the next year, and then we can finally put to rest this silly notion that Quetzalcoatl or the Tooth Fairy or whatever is behind AAV reports.
Maybe then we can finally move forward with the serious business of figuring out how these things operate so we can replicate it.
In the meantime, why don’t you break out your Ouija board as just ask the trickster god how it’s manifesting solid aerial objects that defy inertia - if your hypothesis is correct, you should be able to get answers by just talking to this invisible omnipresent and omnipotent entity, no?