....it is a model airplane type thing shaped round. But here's the point; lots of people use the excuse that its too hard to catch a flying saucer on camera via your iPhone/Android phone (even though it seems 90% of human beings now have a phone/camera in their pockets). Granted this was fake, but if flying saucer sightings as often as they are happening according to "Filers Files" - there should be 1000's of video's of similar quality as this one - but of a
real flying saucer - especially our elusive "mile wide" flying saucer that seems to show up over populated areas yet not one cell phone, surveillance cam, home security cam, police dash cam, civilian dash cam can catch.
I Think Frieza Has Finally Arrived : UFOs
We've debunked this argument several times already and it's like you have some kind of mental block about it, because you act like we've never debated this before.
The sky is vast. UFOs rarely come close enough to get a clear image of them, and when they do, people are usually too shocked to take a picture before they move off, which they tend to do in a short time and at a high rate of speed.
Then there's the issue of resolution. A stupid iPhone can't begin to resolve a 30-50ft object at a distance of miles, which is the typical situation. The human eye, on the other hand, has far better resolution, autofocusing, and autotracking capabilities - modern camera technology doesn't even come close. That's why people can't show you what they've seen with their own eyes - our cameras still aren't anywhere close to the capabilities of the human eye/brain system. I posted about these issues in detail over at The Paracast forums back in May:
A recent UFO case with iPhone photos and video
And I've only heard about
two cases involving a craft on the scale of a mile in size: the Phoenix lights case, which was at night, and the typical camera and film speed of that time was very poorly suited for night-time photography - if anyone managed to overcome their shock and confusion upon seeing that thing, long enough to try to take a picture, then the images probably would've been totally black, fuzzy and useless. The light sensitivity of the human eye is far better than 100-400 speed film, which was pretty much the only kind people were buying in the 90s.
The other case was over the Channel Islands, far from any inhabited area. No surprise that nobody got a shot of those craft. Though Ray Bowyer says that they found the radar tapes, so I'm hoping to see a digitized version of that someday.
Total misconception & false. Any camera that is aimed at the horizon has at least 50% sky. There are tons of videos of the cams I said that have captured meteorological events. These videos are all over YouTube. Dash cam, school security cams, home security cam, etc. It took all of 2 mins to gather up these 7 videos. Every time you see the meteor ask yourself - how come never once we see something akin to Billy Meier's Beamships or other bizarre looking craft like I posted at the beginning of this thread. If all these cams are capturing things like meteors & rocket ships then they should be picking up flying saucers.
How many security cams or home cams are aimed at the horizon? None, probably. They look down, so you can see perpetrators at your door. Have you ever set them up? I have. Nobody points them at the horizon; not that I've ever seen. And even if you did, you wouldn't see much past a few hundred feet; people look like blobs at that short distance on a typical security or dash cam. And even if you did point one at the horizon, the field of view would only be a small fraction of the entire sky, not 50% of it - not even close. Here's
a comparison of the fields of view for the whole range of available CCTV security cameras - even the widest angle 2.8 lens only shows a tiny sliver of the sky. It takes a very specialized fisheye lens to capture 180 degrees of field of view, and only a small fraction of professional photographers own one of those things.
Surveillance cams also have totally shit optics and resolution - the worst out there. It's a minor miracle when you can identify a perp at 20-30ft with one of those things - a craft 5-20 miles away...forget about it.
Then you post all of these videos of meteors lighting up the night sky like an atom bomb. Lol - no AAV ever reported was that bright. Most of them don't even glow, apparently, and when they do, they're not that bright - not by a long shot. Usually people just describe little lights on them, in various colors, akin to the blinker lights on a car: that's going to be very hard if not impossible to catch with a security camera at 1-20+ miles of distance. You're trying to compare the most dramatic luminous events in the night sky, with a small and comparatively dim object in the sky, which is typically at a distance of many miles. It's not even apples and oranges; it's more like nukes vs firecrackers - two radically different scenarios. And AAVs never leave gigantic luminous plasma emissions stretching across the sky like the Space X Falcon 9 launches.
I seriously can't for the life of me understand what you're thinking here. I know it's really frustrating that we don't have a lot of good photos and videos of these things, but when you look at the technology that we have, it's no mystery at all. And in the rare instances that one of these things gets close enough that a clear photo would be possible, people get transfixed and/or scared shitless - the last thing that crosses their mind is documenting it. They're more worried about their mortal survival at that moment, because the last thing that people are prepared to see at any given moment of their day, is an obviously otherworldly interstellar spacecraft with a totally unknown agenda which is capable of instantaneous accelerations and absolutely silent hovering.
