here is my take on reality
consciousness and reality are linked very closely
I am convinced that reality is a construct of consciousness
when you look at reality it follows rules
like anything, electricity and magnetism have rules,
things are measurable at the square or the cube
the links back to math show us what dimension something is in
gravity math is the same as electricity...
but when we try, they are clearly not the same thing
if you look just a bit closer on the topic,
a rotating magnetic field induces an electric field that appears identical to gravity
so how does this link to time ?
guess it depends on how you look at things,
if you look at the field forces, standard physics does not have much to say about them...
but they have lots to say about themselves
electricity and magnetism are at right angles to each other, and the other right angle to that is time or movement
so what happens if you assume that a time field is a thing ?
what happens if you have an unequal time field ?
that turns out to match gravity in the math.
also matches the rotating magnetic field, at least an unequal rotating magnetic field.
so, being that consciousness is likely outside this entire structure, time and anything else likely shows up as how we usually view something like length.
if you want to talk about timelines and how to mess with time,
I am all for that conversation, and I have things to share
I normally don't dissect posts and reply to each part of them. However, This one is filled with subjects that I just love.
I am convinced that reality is a construct of consciousness
when you look at reality it follows rules
like anything, electricity, and magnetism have rules,
Absolutely, The four fundamental forces and how they interact with each other is the bleeding edge of Science, Both empirical and Theoretical, I think It was Thomas who lead me to research on some scientists, Whom's Names escape me that Wanted to somehow connect Gravity with electromagnetic forces. It's an awesome Subject definitely
What Is the Weak Force?
things are measurable at the square or the cube
the links back to math show us what dimension something is in
gravity math is the same as electricity...
but when we try, they are clearly not the same thing
if you look just a bit closer on the topic,
Of course, the Math is Similar It's every last bit based in Algebra and modified up to calculus though. The issue is with the language Different physicists have shall we say different sentence structure and punctuations than some others.
For instance.
"I think" This is Newton's law of universal gravitation
Now, This is the power converter equations for OHMs into Joules, It's The Same math But see, different things are actually expressed here. However, I'm not sure who this equation is credited too. Knowing math is important. But, Knowing the context the Equation is expressing is imperative, In calculus, A rose by any other name, is a completely different rose, ironically
a rotating magnetic field induces an electric field that appears identical to gravity
so how does this link to time?
This, Is something You could probably teach me, I'm not calling this out, I literally Do not know this, And Do you have any information on Rotating Magnetic fields? I'd love to study this. At your leisure of course.
I could say, though, That Any acceleration will increase density, an example would be, Near a particle accelerator, When they are active, Massive gravity accumulates near the rings while it's running, This is because that matter inside is traveling so fast and has taken on so much density. which would have its small amount of an effect on the local space-time around the rotating field, Thusly slowing time, "Because more gravity=slower time," Now, this is where I could be mistaken, but could not a large enough nonphysical electric field produce its own gravity? I'm not certain, So I'm asking you,
electricity and magnetism are at right angles to each other, and the other right angle to that is time or movement
so what happens if you assume that a time field is a thing ?
Don't get me wrong, Normally when I speak Physics, I try to be empirical, I do this for several reasons, but I will fully admit to you, I believe time is relative and possibly quantumly linked with all other time, However, I believe time and space are "localized" -Just my own opinion, not backed up by anything,- However, I believe That Because we are not the same, That me and you both could undergo the Time dilation experiment together, And there would be very minor changes in the way we both experienced time. I believe That Things like our own weight, And density, and maybe even our cognition, Could play a part in how we experience the dilation differently. however, This is all conjecture, And me indulging in my flighty theories. But it is Fun.
what happens if you have an unequal time field ?
that turns out to match gravity in the math.
also matches the rotating magnetic field, at least an unequal rotating magnetic field.
This is very similar in it's reason to Einstein's theory on backward time travel. A theory einstein himself deemed impossible until Roy Ker Came up with an idea a lot like yours about navigating the perimeter of a ring singularity.
Ring singularity - Wikipedia <---Another fascinating read.
so, being that consciousness is likely outside this entire structure, time and anything else likely shows up as how we usually view something like length.
Again another winner. You know, When you speak more than a few words, you actually make a lot of great points. There is a theory That Even though it's mostly theoretical That I fully support. Called Dual consciousness theory. The Theory states. That our consciousness just isn't part of the physical body and actually our consciousness may exist in a higher dimension, separate from our physical bodies. This theory could even go so far as to explain why some people experience premonitions, out of body experiences, or even Deja Vu.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=dual+consciousness+theory&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
Here are some Peer-reviewed Scolorly links about that very subject. You know, WHen you speak at length, The things you say Really do make a lot of Valid scientific points. It's hard to draw a lot from a hand full of words brother. You are smart enough that you should speak more. As far as timelines go, I am a causality believer. I believe there are separate timelines for every decision anyone has ever made or could have made. I think it branches out infinitely.