I agree completely in that Carl Sagan quote......he was someone I admired back in the day. I also do understand how things are presented on websites similar to this and on youtube. To me the person narrating this does qualify as a chucklehead because all he does is make claims.....and in the case of his "city" all I see is pixelated mush. Personally natural landforms fit as an alternative explanation....especially in the case of his alleged "city". No need to call you ignorant.....especially since you strike me as one of the more intelligent and knowledgeable people here. Your observations of what the narrator claims to see are quite clear and the same about the skeptics take on this. Am I more of a skeptic than you......in some ways yes. Am I hard on reports like this.....yes.....but then when I review scientific reports I expect data gaps to be minimized. I expect claims to be backed by evidence and not wishful thinking....and even then nothing is 100%. But at least evidence helps answer questions.....if the people are open minded enough to want to find the answers.