TRUE END TIMES BIBLE PROPHECY - Monarch Briefing

[Shadowprophet]

I invite you to reread the wikipedia page you provided, clearly stating that there NO EVIDENCE AT ALL of any dark matter / dark energy. Often people draw conclusions too fast.

I use exactly the SAME CLUES to prove the FRACTAL TIME, along with many other scientific anomalies, which then disproves the 'missing mass and energy' of the universe! Except that my theory doesn't need any of those 95% of the so-called missing universe. The Absolute Relativity, and its fractal time, is FAR MORE elegant, simple and logic than these 'dark' stuff.

Of course, I am not the only one saying that we don't need those 'dark' matter / energy.

And, of course, the fractal time ALSO explains the remote viewing and the psychic abilities and the UFO prowesses, what the dark matter / dark energy don't.

I invite you to re-re-read it, dark matter constitutes 85% of total mass, while dark energy plus dark matter constitute 95% of total mass-energy content. It's not been directly observed, But the properties are there.

in short, we have more peer-reviewed physical data of the existence of dark matter than we do anything you have spoken about thus far. I have read the page, I wouldn't have quoted it If I hadn't. Dark matter barely interacts with ordinary baryonic matter or radiation except seemingly via gravity, You Have to flipping read the page to grasp how there is evidence of its existence. I'm going to pull a john here, Did you read the page? all the way to the end?

I'm going to throw this in for good measure so you can see, The only reason we can prove Dark matter factually exists is because of it's interaction with its gravity.




Gravity is a property of matter, that is a scientific fact, so where is this excessive gravitational push coming from? Well, We know it must be caused by matter Because gravity is a property of matter it is Dark Because we do not observe the cause of the interaction, Thusly Dark matter. I assure you, as soon as we observe the source of the interaction, It will be renamed. and no longer be called dark matter, For now, though, It's factually scientifically irrefutably Dark-Matter.

 

[Shadowprophet]

The ideal scenario is to realize that Dark matter wouldn't interact with ordinary matter. You couldn't just walk up to it and pick some up an observe it. We can only observe it by the way its gravity interacts with our universe, In this way. If you were standing in a dark room, and you suddenly felt a source of heat. You couldn't observe that heat with your eyes. But you would know it was there because of the temperature sourcing you, You would feel its heat. We observe the gravitational interaction of dark matter on our universe and that's evidenced by the cosmic microwave background.

Dark matter is somewhat like a virtual particle or even metaphysical in a sense. You can't just pick some up and study it. It's as if Gravity from almost another reality is pulling at our universe and we don't know exactly why. In the end, this is why forums are weird, We have some guy, Telling prophecies trying to disprove something like Dark matter. But Things like Ego and social primping can force a person to bite off more than they can chew, It's hard to debate the existence of Dark matter when we have peer-reviewed articles discussing its functions in detail.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?...rk+matter&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

Take your pick, Any one of these articles discusses Dark matter in depth and with peer-reviewed sources. The only reason, Laymen, Yes, I used the Term Laymen, Site Dark matter as unproven is simply because they are laymen, You would have to bring a piece of dark matter to them and set it in their lap and then allow them to play with it for a while before they will believe it exists.

Well, If peer-reviewed articles discussing the function of the subject won't suffice to prove the existence of dark matter to one, Then that person doesn't need to be discussing science.

 

[Shadowprophet]

Wow, Not derailing, But This one is good, Did you guys know there is a theory about the localized distribution of dark matter? Clumps and streams in the local dark matter distribution

This is is neat, Reading, BBL.

 

[john4564]

Quoting the bible is as relevant to me as quoting Harry Potter.As I’ve posted earlier I’m sticking to my prediction,you stick to yours and time will tell.

Sure, time will tell.

 

[john4564]

.../...One of the two conditions in Daniel 9 for this same Anointed One to appear (the first one being once passed OCT 15 2016) is the 7 'sevens' after the June 28 1967 Knesset Decree to rebuilt Jerusalem. JUN 28 1967 + (7 x 7 years) = JUN 28 2016.

So, on next JUN 28 2019, we will be exactly 3 years beyond that condition to fulfill, and before May 3 2020.

JUN 28 2019 - MAY3 2020 is the time window. But the ET intel makes me think it's clearly very close.

What is interesting is that 49 + 3 years = 52 years. When you multiply it by 7 you get 364 years, like a year is 52 x 7 weeks (364 days), i.e. the 52 weeks of the year.

Daniel met Christ in Dan 10 in 539 BC. This year, in that chapter, Christ announced his coming for the end times (to fight againt the Prince of Persia, aka Satan) with the Prince of Greece, aka the future Prince William (heir of Prince Philip, Prince of Greece, then Prince Charles). From 539 BC to 2018 included, there are 7 Christic years (2,557 years), provided that a 'year' of Christ is 365.25 of our years. So, from the June 28 1967 Knesset decree, June 28 2019 ends the 7th period of the 7th 'Christic year' since that announcement.

This tells us two things. The 7 'sevens' is nothing but a specific clue, implemented in the 70 and 62 'sevens' main information having the same time reference (decreed Gregorian Calendar), to give us the date when the end times really start, that is JUNE 28 2019. Both the Holy City (Jerusalem), attached to 7 'sevens', and the Most Holy Place (New Jerusalem), attached to 70 'sevens', are mentioned.

June 28 1967 is related to Jerusalem.

June 28 2019 is related to the NEW Jerusalem, itself related to the return of Christ, King of the kings of that City of God!

 

[john4564]

I invite you to re-re-read it, dark matter constitutes 85% of total mass, while dark energy plus dark matter constitute 95% of total mass-energy content. It's not been directly observed, But the properties are there.

That's what I said. LIKE MANY, including scientists, you make the Dark Matter / Energy a BELIEF!

Reread the wikipedia page:

Dark matter is a form of matter that is thought to account for approximately 85% of the matter in the universe and about a quarter of its total energy density. The majority of dark matter is thought to be non-baryonic in nature, possibly being composed of some as-yet undiscovered subatomic particles.
.../...
Because dark matter has not yet been observed directly, if it exists, it must barely interact with ordinary baryonic matter and radiation, except through gravity.

in short, we have more peer-reviewed physical data of the existence of dark matter than we do anything you have spoken about thus far. I have read the page, I wouldn't have quoted it If I hadn't. Dark matter barely interacts with ordinary baryonic matter or radiation except seemingly via gravity, You Have to flipping read the page to grasp how there is evidence of its existence. I'm going to pull a john here, Did you read the page? all the way to the end?

It seems you didn't read it very carefully, hence my quote above from YOUR wikipedia page. Could you explain why you skip 'if it exists' in your quote? (in bold in your post above) Is this embarrasing for your demonstration? Or do you have a selective kind of reading skill?

I'm going to throw this in for good measure so you can see, The only reason we can prove Dark matter factually exists is because of it's interaction with its gravity.
.../...
Gravity is a property of matter, that is a scientific fact, so where is this excessive gravitational push coming from? Well, We know it must be caused by matter Because gravity is a property of matter it is Dark Because we do not observe the cause of the interaction, Thusly Dark matter. I assure you, as soon as we observe the source of the interaction, It will be renamed. and no longer be called dark matter, For now, though, It's factually scientifically irrefutably Dark-Matter.

What you fail to undertand, like many scientists too (except few of them), is that there is ANOTHER EXPLANATION for the SO-CALLED missing gravity: FRACTAL TIME.

The new name of the cause of the interaction IS the fractal time. And NOTHING is missing. What is scientifically irrefutable is NOT dark matter / energy but the scientific ANOMALIES some people TRY to explain with dark stuff.

What you just avoid to envisage is HOW could fractal time be the source (a far better source actually) of those anomalies instead of the dark stuff.

 

[Shadowprophet]

That's what I said. LIKE MANY, including scientists, you make the Dark Matter / Energy a BELIEF!

Reread the wikipedia page:

Dark matter is a form of matter that is thought to account for approximately 85% of the matter in the universe and about a quarter of its total energy density. The majority of dark matter is thought to be non-baryonic in nature, possibly being composed of some as-yet undiscovered subatomic particles.
.../...
Because dark matter has not yet been observed directly, if it exists, it must barely interact with ordinary baryonic matter and radiation, except through gravity.


It seems you didn't read it very carefully, hence my quote above from YOUR wikipedia page. Could you explain why you skip 'if it exists' in your quote? (in bold in your post above) Is this embarrasing for your demonstration? Or do you have a selective kind of reading skill?


What you fail to undertand, like many scientists too (except few of them), is that there is ANOTHER EXPLANATION for the SO-CALLED missing gravity: FRACTAL TIME.

The new name of the cause of the interaction IS the fractal time. And NOTHING is missing. What is scientifically irrefutable is NOT dark matter / energy but the scientific ANOMALIES some people TRY to explain with dark stuff.

What you just avoid to envisage is HOW could fractal time be the source (a far better source actually) of those anomalies instead of the dark stuff.

You are a riot to speak too, There is just no way I can step you through all of particle physics. Don't get me wrong, I believe in God, I believe in Jesus, But you believe Jesus is coming in two days. There is a logic gap that I'm unable to debate around. don't get me wrong, I keep an open mind, But Gregg Braden Is a pseudo-scientist, Fractile time is a bullshit theory which when examined is a butchered conglomeration of relativity with some string theory thrown to account for a lack of understanding of dimensional theory... It's Modern science fiction for people with brains to eager or fidgety to learn real physics.

I'm telling you, brother, You can Bolden all the Red letters you want, Dark matter is a factual concept Because The Term Dark matter is used to describe something we don't fully understand, As I've stated. As far as fractile time goes, That's an outright Bullshit Pseudoscience. And I wouldn't rot my brain on it, bro.


You have set yourself on a very poor timer, So do I put in the effort to literally beat you in this debate, By teaching you advanced physics that you clearly can't comprehend? Or do I just Wait two days until Jesus doesn't show up?

 

[john4564]

The ideal scenario is to realize that Dark matter wouldn't interact with ordinary matter. You couldn't just walk up to it and pick some up an observe it. We can only observe it by the way its gravity interacts with our universe, In this way. If you were standing in a dark room, and you suddenly felt a source of heat. You couldn't observe that heat with your eyes. But you would know it was there because of the temperature sourcing you, You would feel its heat. We observe the gravitational interaction of dark matter on our universe and that's evidenced by the cosmic microwave background.

Dark matter is somewhat like a virtual particle or even metaphysical in a sense. You can't just pick some up and study it. It's as if Gravity from almost another reality is pulling at our universe and we don't know exactly why. In the end, this is why forums are weird, We have some guy, Telling prophecies trying to disprove something like Dark matter. But Things like Ego and social primping can force a person to bite off more than they can chew, It's hard to debate the existence of Dark matter when we have peer-reviewed articles discussing its functions in detail.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?...rk+matter&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

Take your pick, Any one of these articles discusses Dark matter in depth and with peer-reviewed sources. The only reason, Laymen, Yes, I used the Term Laymen, Site Dark matter as unproven is simply because they are laymen, You would have to bring a piece of dark matter to them and set it in their lap and then allow them to play with it for a while before they will believe it exists.

Well, If peer-reviewed articles discussing the function of the subject won't suffice to prove the existence of dark matter to one, Then that person doesn't need to be discussing science.

You say:

You couldn't observe that heat with your eyes.
Dark matter is somewhat like a virtual particle or even metaphysical in a sense.
It's as if Gravity from almost another reality is pulling at our universe and we don't know exactly why.

How could you prove anything about dark matter / energy from what you say about dark matter / energy?...while I can prove the fractal time with the very same anomalies used to prove dark matter / energy...without asking the universe to hide something that WOULD constitute 95% of its nature. The reality is that all is a problem of the observation scale. Hence the fractal time (and fractal space).

About the so-called peer-reviewed articles, you should be aware that the string theory started in the 60's and got MANY peer-reviewed articles. But with time, it was replaced by the chromodynamics. WHY? But today, one uses again the string theory, with AGAIN many peer-reviewed articles, to explain it all. BUT NO PROOF had ever been provided.

So, better know the world of science. How it works. You would be surprised how discoveries emerge. Sometimes from people not from the so-called 'peer-reviewed' science. Just study history of science.

 

[john4564]

Wow, Not derailing, But This one is good, Did you guys know there is a theory about the localized distribution of dark matter? Clumps and streams in the local dark matter distribution

This is is neat, Reading, BBL.

This 'article' about a SIMULATED dark matter model says:

The simulation also reveals the fractal nature of dark matter clustering: isolated haloes and subhaloes contain the same relative amount of substructure and both have cusped inner density profiles.

OOOPS! You say fractal nature? Wait few more years and you won't see the words 'dark something', but instead relative observation scale.

 

[Shadowprophet]

You say:

You couldn't observe that heat with your eyes.
Dark matter is somewhat like a virtual particle or even metaphysical in a sense.
It's as if Gravity from almost another reality is pulling at our universe and we don't know exactly why.

How could you prove anything about dark matter / energy from what you say about dark matter / energy?...while I can prove the fractal time with the very same anomalies used to prove dark matter / energy...without asking the universe to hide something that WOULD constitute 95% of its nature. The reality is that all is a problem of the observation scale. Hence the fractal time (and fractal space).

About the so-called peer-reviewed articles, you should be aware that the string theory started in the 60's and got MANY peer-reviewed articles. But with time, it was replaced by the chromodynamics. WHY? But today, one uses again the string theory, with AGAIN many peer-reviewed articles, to explain it all. BUT NO PROOF had ever been provided.

So, better know the world of science. How it works. You would be surprised how discoveries emerge. Sometimes from people not from the so-called 'peer-reviewed' science. Just study history of science.

Look I can't get through to you with Science, I'm not posting this to intimidate you, Or to be mean, At this point, I'm only responding because It's a habit.

This is why I can't take you seriously, If you were educated enough to Teach me something, None of those red slashes would be there, Now, here is the thing, You can shake this off, And I welcome you to because it's not meant to be an insult. But Educated people do not do this. This is not the way an educated person's post would appear.

I'm not saying this to be mean, There is a Bar set for what Education and the Educated are, Every red slash there says you do not meet this bar, sir. I mean you no harm or no ill will. But Someone should be factually pointing these things out.

I don't like the constant back and fourth of debates when they never go anywhere, If you been here long enough to make 297 posts and learned nothing, It's because you are so busy telling people what you think and not listening to others.

I don't know what to say at this point, But to point out, there are a lot of educated people here.
these forums are special because most of those educated people love to share their minds. If you would only be open to listening to others.

 

[john4564]

You are a riot to speak too, There is just no way I can step you through all of particle physics. Don't get me wrong, I believe in God, I believe in Jesus, But you believe Jesus is coming in two days. There is a logic gap that I'm unable to debate around. don't get me wrong, I keep an open mind, But Gregg Braden Is a pseudo-scientist, Fractile time is a bullshit theory which when examined is a butchered conglomeration of relativity with some string theory thrown to account for a lack of understanding of dimensional theory... It's Modern science fiction for people with brains to eager or fidgety to learn real physics.

I'm telling you, brother, You can Bolden all the Red letters you want, Dark matter is a factual concept Because The Term Dark matter is used to describe something we don't fully understand, As I've stated. As far as fractile time goes, That's an outright Bullshit Pseudoscience. And I wouldn't rot my brain on it, bro.


You have set yourself on a very poor timer, So do I put in the effort to literally beat you in this debate, By teaching you advanced physics that you clearly can't comprehend? Or do I just Wait two days until Jesus doesn't show up?

This is the other way around. YOU don't understand physics. I do. You don't know science. I do. Fractal Time is studied by MANY TOP SCIENTISTS, but you don't know it. Why do you think that, Alexander P. Levich, the President of the The Institute for Time Nature Explorations thanked me for the new vision of time I provided in 2003?

Now, if you want to personally BELIEVE in dark matter, do you think it matters to me? That's funny that all the people uneducated in science call 'pseudoscience' what they don't know and / or understand, while top physicists secretly prepare the future with it. LOL...

 

[Shadowprophet]

I love to debate, Don't take the things I say personally. I don't mean them that way when I say them, And I don't personally know you, So how can it be personal.

 

[Shadowprophet]

This is the other way around. YOU don't understand physics. I do. You don't know science. I do. Fractal Time is studied by MANY TOP SCIENTISTS, but you don't know it. Why do you think that, Alexander P. Levich, the President of the
The Institute for Time Nature Explorations

thanked me for the new vision of time I provided in 2003?

Now, if you want to personally BELIEVE in dark matter, do you think it matters to me? That's funny that all the people uneducated in science call 'pseudoscience' what they don't know and / or understand, while top physicists secretly prepare the future with it. LOL...

I don't know the science, Dear sir, At this point, I'm going to have to allow others to speak in my place.

Because If I didn't allow others to speak in my place, I think I would attack you viciously from this point out. I don't know science, You are a fucking lunatic dude.

I'm not here to brag about what I know, I don't have to, I've got years or legacy built up speaking about science and discussing it not just here but on multiple platforms, And I've got to be honest, Telling me that I don't know science. If we were, personally speaking, you would be sporting a broken nose at this very moment.

Peace out lunatic.

 

[john4564]

Look I can't get through to you with Science, I'm not posting this to intimidate you, Or to be mean, At this point, I'm only responding because It's a habit.

This is why I can't take you seriously, If you were educated enough to Teach me something, None of those red slashes would be there, Now, here is the thing, You can shake this off, And I welcome you to because it's not meant to be an insult. But Educated people do not do this. This is not the way an educated person's post would appear.

I'm not saying this to be mean, There is a Bar set for what Education and the Educated are, Every red slash there says you do not meet this bar, sir. I mean you no harm or no ill will. But Someone should be factually pointing these things out.

I don't like the constant back and fourth of debates when they never go anywhere, If you been here long enough to make 297 posts and learned nothing, It's because you are so busy telling people what you think and not listening to others.

I don't know what to say at this point, But to point out, there are a lot of educated people here.
these forums are special because most of those educated people love to share their minds. If you would only be open to listening to others.

Sorry to tell you that bro. Your post is empty...except that you make good evil, and conversely.

 

[john4564]

This is the other way around. YOU don't understand physics. I do. You don't know science. I do. Fractal Time is studied by MANY TOP SCIENTISTS, but you don't know it. Why do you think that, Alexander P. Levich, the President of the The Institute for Time Nature Explorations thanked me for the new vision of time I provided in 2003?

Now, if you want to personally BELIEVE in dark matter, do you think it matters to me? That's funny that all the people uneducated in science call 'pseudoscience' what they don't know and / or understand, while top physicists secretly prepare the future with it. LOL...

 

[Shadowprophet]

Sorry to tell you that bro. Your post is empty...except that you make good evil, and conversely.

I'm about as offended as I can be at your idiocy. I can normally tolerance a lot of bullshit. You tend to bring out the worst me, you bring out the side of me that wants to literally decimate someone, You sir, Are no good for my peace of mind.

A false prophet who cannot use the kings English speaking about how Jesus is coming in two days. You get under my skin in ways that just aren't natural. No no no, I continue speaking, I know how this will end. I will end up banned.

 

[john4564]

I'm about as offended as I can be at your idiocy. I can normally tolerance a lot of bullshit. You tend to bring out the worst me, you bring out the side of me that wants to literally decimate someone, You sir, Are no good for my peace of mind.

A false prophet who cannot use the kings English speaking about how Jesus is coming in two days. You get under my skin in ways that just aren't natural. No no no, I continue speaking, I know how this will end. I will end up banned.

I didn't say that Jesus is coming in two days. The FIRST UFO EVENT could take place at that moment. The return of Christ could be few days later.

 

[Shadowprophet]

I didn't say that Jesus is coming in two days. The FIRST UFO EVENT could take place at that moment. The return of Christ could be few days later.

No one cares though, You are a rude pedantic troll, The only thing you really care about is getting a rise out of people.
Everyone can see that.

This whole thing kind of sickens me, I'm gonna just find my way out of it.

 

[Ron67]

I'm about as offended as I can be at your idiocy. I can normally tolerance a lot of bullshit. You tend to bring out the worst me, you bring out the side of me that wants to literally decimate someone, You sir, Are no good for my peace of mind.

A false prophet who cannot use the kings English speaking about how Jesus is coming in two days. You get under my skin in ways that just aren't natural. No no no, I continue speaking, I know how this will end. I will end up banned.

I don’t always agree with you but I find you to be genuine and thoughtful.This idiot is clearly delusional at best and not worth getting wound up over.His predictions will fail again,he will disappear and then reappear again sprouting similar nonsense.

 

[Shadowprophet]

I don’t always agree with you but I find you to be genuine and thoughtful.This idiot is clearly delusional at best and not worth getting wound up over.His predictions will fail again,he will disappear and then reappear again sprouting similar nonsense.

Thank you brother, I was temporarily worked up, I'm over it now, But, I can see talking to him really won't get any points across.

The best thing I can do is just chill. I think I may watch that Shazam movie again, It was pretty good, I only watched it once