TRUE END TIMES BIBLE PROPHECY - Monarch Briefing

[Double Nought Spy]

Quoting the bible is as relevant to me as quoting Harry Potter.As I’ve posted earlier I’m sticking to my prediction,you stick to yours and time will tell.

Quoting Harry Potter is more relevant for me, since it's actually very good fiction that sometimes deals with real issues relevant to modern life. I suppose in time there will be some knuckleheads taking the Harry Potter books as some kind of ultimate truth, forming study groups, basing all sorts of silly crap on bad translations, and so on. No doubt it has already begun.

As for the current thread, I usually stay out of stuff like this, but this particular whack job produces some really entertaining train wrecks.

 

[Rikki]

Sure, I will consult them as soon as they contact me. They are from the spiritual realm. To come here, they materialize. You could certainly meet them if you practice remote viewing.

You are convinced that the entity's you contact are alien in origin. You also hold to the bible as fact. I am concerned for you. Any spiritual being can claim to be aliens. If I used a Ouija board to talk to "grandma" odds are I am not talking to her.
After reading your claims I must profess you are in contact with a "demon" a negative entity that delights in deceiving us.
Your claims about the royal family are doubtful as well.
I can join my husband in challenging you but I see no good fruit. Finally I HAVE had prophetic visions. One is shared by my oldest daughter. These visions are of a personal nature. I will never say they are what WILL be but may be.
Threefold blessings upon you and your house!
Blessed Be
Rikki

 

[Shadowprophet]

Since we are speaking truthfully. I feel a need to explain my outburst from earlier. I fully believe most people get it. Of all the subjects of study within higher education, I've always had a natural draw to science, It's something I'm passionate about, I'm not proclaiming to be any kind of authority on science, Not here, Not at these forums, Not among people who I deem literal peers and equals.

It's just for someone to declare that I don't know science. I wasn't prepared for that, No one has ever even said that to me. I handled the situation poorly. The embarrassment for losing my cool is mine to bare. It's like dang though... in fairness, I was being pretty mean myself I guess. Mean never works out for me, I'm not a mean person, And when I have to be mean, I'm really bad at it.

Still though.

NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter
NASA - NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter Posted by NASA. This was in 2006, I think? There is a lot of evidence for dark matter, But, I now see the problem.

One cannot force another to accept their words. Things like proof, Evidence, and truth, those things literally are subjective, Those are just things people ask for to pad out these fantastic shows. In the end, No one can make anyone accept their input, Not facts not proof, not evidence. I knew this beforehand, I feel I shouldn't have lost my cool like that. It shows a lack of patience. Maybe a lack of tolerance And those sound like issues that fall on me. So a man says something, I don't like, and No words I can say will reach him. And the only Draw he has, Is my desire to take the bait and fall into his trap. In some ways, John is more clever than he seems, His information may be damaged, But he knows how to "Not Lose" I find that interesting.

 

[john4564]

.../...

.../...

Thanks Shadowprophet for this video that you should have watched more attentively.

This video has been published in 2015, AFTER the NASA article (2006) you spoke about later. Its title is 'How Do We Know Dark Matter Exists?'

There is a long speech which is concluded this way at 4'13": 'or maybe there is no dark matter after all and we are about to learn something totally new about the universe'.

This guy is right. What is totally new is the Abolute Relativity and its the fractal time. And dark matter doesn't not exist. We see here, like in many places and from many people, including scientists who defend their stance (like this dark matter theory) and credit lines to still exit on the scientific scene, that titles (videos or articles) are not proofs, nor evidences of anything as long as one doesn't comprehend what is all about.

 

[john4564]

Fixed below.

Thanks Shadowprophet for this video that you should have watched more attentively.

This video has been published in 2015, AFTER the NASA article (2006) you spoke about later. Its title is 'How Do We Know Dark Matter Exists?'

There is a long speech which is concluded this way at 4'13": 'or maybe there is no dark matter after all and we are about to learn something totally new about the universe'.

This guy is right. What is totally new is the Abolute Relativity and its fractal time. And dark matter doesn't exist. We see here, like in many places and from many people, including scientists who defend their stance (like this dark matter theory) and credit lines to still exist on the scientific scene, that titles (videos' or articles') are not proofs, nor evidences of anything as long as one doesn't comprehend what is all about.

 

[john4564]

I don’t always agree with you but I find you to be genuine and thoughtful.This idiot is clearly delusional at best and not worth getting wound up over.His predictions will fail again,he will disappear and then reappear again sprouting similar nonsense.

Personal attacks and insults. The way of the weak.

 

[john4564]

Quoting Harry Potter is more relevant for me, since it's actually very good fiction that sometimes deals with real issues relevant to modern life. I suppose in time there will be some knuckleheads taking the Harry Potter books as some kind of ultimate truth, forming study groups, basing all sorts of silly crap on bad translations, and so on. No doubt it has already begun.

As for the current thread, I usually stay out of stuff like this, but this particular whack job produces some really entertaining train wrecks.

Has the Harry Potter series being fulfilled in proved history in any kind of way? Is history what you call 'whack job'?

 

[john4564]

You are convinced that the entity's you contact are alien in origin. You also hold to the bible as fact. I am concerned for you. Any spiritual being can claim to be aliens. If I used a Ouija board to talk to "grandma" odds are I am not talking to her.
After reading your claims I must profess you are in contact with a "demon" a negative entity that delights in deceiving us.
Your claims about the royal family are doubtful as well.
I can join my husband in challenging you but I see no good fruit. Finally I HAVE had prophetic visions. One is shared by my oldest daughter. These visions are of a personal nature. I will never say they are what WILL be but may be.
Threefold blessings upon you and your house!
Blessed Be
Rikki

Thank you to make me laugh, Rikki. My contacts are demonic but yours are not, of course. When it is about science, one uses insults to hide one's own ignorance or misundertanding. When it is about aliens, one uses the 'demons' card to hide one's own fear or ignorance.

Our visions and contacts are also of personal nature but are directly linked to the end times prophecies, and we are FAR from sharing all of them, more than 200. We have had time and opportunities to distinguish between the various sorts of creatures / species.

Don't be concerned for me. Be concerned for you when you judge the others. You will be judged the same way, even if you 'bless' them.

Who is your husband, supposedly challenging me, among the posters?

 

[john4564]

.../...
Still though.

NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter
NASA - NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter Posted by NASA. This was in 2006, I think? There is a lot of evidence for dark matter, But, I now see the problem.
.../....

This article was written on August 2006, almost ten years before the video you have previouly posted. If there was any kind of real proof about the dark matter, or dark energy, the youtuber wouldn't have concluded that these matter and energy maybe don't exist. The evidence would have been shared all over the world, and wikipedia would have stated that that theory has been proved without the least doubt, 2006 + 13 years later! But wikipedia didn't.

So, there is NOT a lot of evidence for dark matter. There are just SPECULATIONS.

What amuses me is that the article doesn't name the other challenging theories in:

Despite considerable evidence for dark matter, some scientists have proposed alternative theories for gravity where it is stronger on intergalactic scales than predicted by Newton and Einstein, removing the need for dark matter. However, such theories cannot explain the observed effects of this collision.

Which theories? Not named. Not explained.

Actually, these scientists didn't provide the least evidence of the dark matter existence, BUT JUST the confirmation of a gravitational anomaly in the tremendous collision of two large clusters of galaxies.

The observation is true. The explanation is false (but could be right in their eyes as long as a better explanation is not provided yet). So, this is really dishonest from them to claim that they had evidence for the dark matter. HISTORY PROVED THEM WRONG, otherwise this evidence would have gone public with no more debates...which still go on!

These scientists certainly did not know The Science of Extraterrestrials which has been published in English in October 2006 (three months after this article). Besides, the Absolute Relativity (and its fractal time) explains not only gravity anomalies, and their correlative lensing effects, but A LOT of various scientific mysteries, including in quantum physics, such as the EPR experiment.

So, you don't see the real problem, actually. Sorry bro.

AT LAST, you should have read the whole page of your link above where you can see the NASA disclaimer (so, please, post now useful, checked, undisputed and updated info. This will avoid us to waste our time):




Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit NASA.gov for current information

 

[Ron67]

Personal attacks and insults. The way of the weak.

You have proven over the years that you are both of the above.If facts are insults in your world then I’m happy to insult you!.

 

[john4564]

You have proven over the years that you are both of the above.If facts are insults in your world then I’m happy to insult you!.

Links?

 

[Ron67]

Links?

Links!,everything you’ve predicted has been wrong (delusional)..You keep doing the same things over and over again with the same result.(You being wrong).. Idiocy in action..You’re welcome.

 

[john4564]

Links!,everything you’ve predicted has been wrong (delusional)..You keep doing the same things over and over again with the same result.(You being wrong).. Idiocy in action..You’re welcome.

I first talked about personal attacks and insults from you. Tools you used to (not) address my points. I asked you to show me the links where I used such tools (personal attacks and insults),

ME: Personal attacks and insults. The way of the weak.
YOU: You have proven over the years that you are both of the above.
ME: Links?

but you reply to me with me being wrong...what I always admitted for reasons I explained. That is not idiocy but honesty and analysis.

 

[Ron67]

As with everything you say we should agree to disagree.Im just killing time til my flight takes off.(Aeroplane not flying saucer).

 

[Shadowprophet]

@John,

Though accurate at the time, It's no longer being updated. It says nowhere that's it's inaccurate. John, in fact, it says it was accurate and is no longer being updated, that's a completely different thing. and it was stated by NASA.
And for the record John, I don't care what you think about weakness or strength.

Just because someone has the humility to show that they aren't an asshole, doesn't make them weak. I've given you a lot of evidence of The existence of Dark matter, More evidence then you can muster about any claim you have ever made.

The only thing you have managed to prove is someone can repeatedly pelt you with truth and facts and you have an innate ability to remain Idioioically oblivious to those things throughout.
If this information about Dark matter was ever accurate At what point did it become inaccurate? Isn't calling someone weak a personal attack? You are a conundrum, George, I once Taught Autistic Children in a class George, The thing about Autistic children is, They are incredibly reluctant to change or new ideologies. Yet these children could learn.

You don't seem to possess that ability, No matter how much information no matter how much peer review, No matter how many facts someone puts at your door sept.

You are a strange man John.

 

[Shadowprophet]

@John,

Though accurate at the time, It's no longer being updated. It says nowhere that's it's inaccurate. John, in fact, it says it was accurate and is no longer being updated, that's a completely different thing. and it was stated by NASA.
And for the record John, I don't care what you think about weakness or strength.

Just because someone has the humility to show that they aren't an asshole, doesn't make them weak. I've given you a lot of evidence of The existence of Dark matter, More evidence then you can muster about any claim you have ever made.

The only thing you have managed to prove is someone can repeatedly pelt you with truth and facts and you have an innate ability to remain Idioioically oblivious to those things throughout.
If this information about Dark matter was ever accurate At what point did it become inaccurate? Isn't calling someone weak a personal attack? You are a conundrum, George, I once Taught Autistic Children in a class George, The thing about Autistic children is, They are incredibly reluctant to change or new ideologies. Yet these children could learn.

You don't seem to possess that ability, No matter how much information no matter how much peer review, No matter how many facts someone puts at your door sept.

You are a strange man John.

Hmm, I mistakenly, Called this Man George, Twice in the above post. Why did this occur, I need my coffee.

 

[pepe]

It's called pigeon holing.

 

[Ron67]

He’s more of a Lennie than a George I’d say!.

 

[Shadowprophet]

As I see it, John demanding evidence and citations on information is very humorous considering his claims.
with everything said and done though, I think it's important to call this thread for what it is, We are all here because this thread is entertaining. It had to be said lol

 

[Ron67]

As I see it, John demanding evidence and citations on information is very humorous considering his claims.
with everything said and done though, I think it's important to call this thread for what it is, We are all here because this thread is entertaining. It had to be said lol

You are absolutely correct.