UFO Images

[nivek]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k25yP6eL6bk

Bizarre T-Shaped UFO Photographed in Mexico​

A very strange photograph taken in Mexico City shows a bizarre T-shaped UFO mysteriously hovering in the sky. The puzzling picture was reportedly snapped back in mid-February, though seemingly only surfaced online this past week when it was shared on social media. The individual behind the odd image is said to have been "trying to take a photo of the volcanoes" on the horizon when they inadvertently captured the curious anomaly "that was never visible to the naked eye." Presumably, it was only later that the photographer noticed the somewhat metallic-looking T-shaped object in the picture. As for what the anomaly might have been, as one might imagine, some online observers have suggested that the peculiar form is an alien craft of some kind or perhaps a clandestine terrestrial vehicle. Skeptical observers, however, argue that the UFO is merely an errant balloon.

.

 

[max]

Lot of strange objects flying

 

[Todd Feinman]

Interesting images from Stoke-on-Trent:

'That's gotta be a UFO!' Mystery lights over Stoke-on-Trent

It's a mystery!

www.stokesentinel.co.uk

 

[Alien UFO]

UFO photographed by my friend in Changchun, China, in September 2024

 

[Alien UFO]

UFO photographed by my friend in Changchun, China, in September 2024

 

[Alien UFO]

A Chinese netizen: This photo is still in my mobile phone album, 2012
It was taken on April 22 in Yunnan
Mengzi City, Honghe Prefecture, Guangdong Province, shooting equipment
Phone4s, I was in high school,
After school in the afternoon, I happened to see a black sky
The point hung motionless and looked carefully with the naked eye
It's shaped, it's blurry when you zoom in,
But you can see the general outline. Feed the triangle
Or disc-shaped, without any sound, either
Unlike a kite, because a kite can swing,
And this object doesn't move a bit the whole way
Moving signs, watched for about 20 minutes. One
Straight there

 

[pigfarmer]

I am not doubting you but I am frankly amazed at that clarity from an iPhone 4S. I've been trying to capture large low flying aircraft that I actually expect to see and can't get decent pics even with a much newer iPhone. They just aren't made to provide detail at a distance.

Makes me wonder about how big and far away it actually is. My first disordered thought is that it generally fits the descriptions given by air crews in after action reports after raiding the Schweinfurt, Germany ball bearing factories.

 

[Dejan Corovic]

I am not doubting you but I am frankly amazed at that clarity from an iPhone 4S. I've been trying to capture large low flying aircraft that I actually expect to see and can't get decent pics even with a much newer iPhone. They just aren't made to provide detail at a distance.

Makes me wonder about how big and far away it actually is. My first disordered thought is that it generally fits the descriptions given by air crews in after action reports after raiding the Schweinfurt, Germany ball bearing factories.

Distance can be estimated from how hazy UFO is. More hazy it iz further away it is. Very, very roughtly I would say its about 100 - 200m ( 300 - 600 ft ).

 

[Alien UFO]

I am not doubting you but I am frankly amazed at that clarity from an iPhone 4S. I've been trying to capture large low flying aircraft that I actually expect to see and can't get decent pics even with a much newer iPhone. They just aren't made to provide detail at a distance.

Makes me wonder about how big and far away it actually is. My first disordered thought is that it generally fits the descriptions given by air crews in after action reports after raiding the Schweinfurt, Germany ball bearing factories.

Yes, friend. This was just taken by a netizen on Douyin in China. As for the authenticity of this photo and the related story he told, I'm really not sure. Judge for yourself whether it's true or false.

 

[pigfarmer]

Judge for yourself whether it's true or false

Unfortunately considering the current capability for photo manipulation the smart money is on 'false'.

Also unfortunate that probably means real ones get dismissed.

I've gone on at length here about a local UFO 'wave' that had quite a few people in a stir and some are still talking about that was largely deliberately aggravated hysteria brought on by outsiders. In amongst all that there are two reports I am aware of that do not fit the pattern at all that truly are High Strange that were ignored.

One of them appeared here and I was able to corroborate very accurately what he has been saying for years with archived newspaper articles and a good look at a map. Were it not for all the nonsense maybe somebody would've paid a bit more attention back then, but to what end I don't know. Just seems like missed opportunities if nothing else.

 

[Alien UFO]

Unfortunately considering the current capability for photo manipulation the smart money is on 'false'.

Also unfortunate that probably means real ones get dismissed.

I've gone on at length here about a local UFO 'wave' that had quite a few people in a stir and some are still talking about that was largely deliberately aggravated hysteria brought on by outsiders. In amongst all that there are two reports I am aware of that do not fit the pattern at all that truly are High Strange that were ignored.

One of them appeared here and I was able to corroborate very accurately what he has been saying for years with archived newspaper articles and a good look at a map. Were it not for all the nonsense maybe somebody would've paid a bit more attention back then, but to what end I don't know. Just seems like missed opportunities if nothing else.

Just as you said, UFO sighting photos and videos are indeed a mixture of genuine and fake ones, and some real ones are overlooked instead. I also heard about the New Jersey UFO incident in the United States on the Internet platforms in our country, but it is also very complicated.

 

[Double Nought Spy]

Heh. This is a good place to leave this.


View: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/christmas-amongst-the-joshua-trees/id1251197422?i=1000681182939

 

[1963]

On April 19, 1978, police officer Mark Coltrane was on patrol in the vicinity of Colfax, a small town with a thousands of inhabitants in Wisconsin, USA. At midday, he decided to stop the car to eat something, in a small isolated area. He noted that his radio was emitting crackles.

He then noticed a metalic looking disc raising towards the the sky at a short distance from the parking space.
While the object seemed to move towards him, Coltrane picked up his Polaroid camera, came out of the car and snapped some photographs. The object was so close in one of the images that it is possible to notice some details of its lower surface.
In [the second] photograph the object is starting to move away.
The total observation lasted a few minutes, the object being being lost from his sight when it accelerated and fled in the distance.
Coltrane, shocked by the sighting, remained in amazement for two hours without saying anything, by fear of being ridiculed when he would have to submit his report to his chiefs.

...And this is the best quality 'blow-up' The first photograph...
https://i.ibb.co/Ltpn1pC/1978-ufo.jpg

... I know that this pair of photos will be vary familiar to most here... and know that it has never been 'debunked' .. [not that any photo can be totally authenticated anyway] ... but i've always declared that I believe this picture to be as good as any. [well, better than most]
... the thing is that there is another set of photos that I had seen many times on various sites, books etc that somehow didn't 'float my believability-boat' in quite the same manner, and the kicker is that i've only just learned that the two sets of photos were in fact taken in the same place 25 years apart! ... the second set being 'The February 2003 Weyauwega UFO photos ... Wisconsin USA , Waupaca County. ... I just checked the distance and now realise that there is about 150 miles between the two sites , but let's face it... that nothing to a flying saucer lol , and I can't help thinking that the 'style' of flying saucer [ie under-belly lighting] make this 'a bit of a coincidence' to my way of thinking.

http://www.ufoevidence.org/photographs/photosmain/WisconsinFeb2003b.jpg

Conclusions

While there is nothing apparent in these images to give reason to doubt there integrity, there is still no way to be absolutely certain they were not faked. They were apparently taken with a relatively low-end digital camera, but there are plenty of ways that they could have been made to appear that way. If the pictures had been taken with a 35MM camera and the negatives were available for evaluation, we could be much more certain about their legitimacy.
With those reservations aside, I am intrigued by what they do show. If real, these pictures are some of the clearest I have seen of a low-flying daylight disk. Now, it's possible that Goodyear or the nice folks in the Air Force decided to send a top-secret prototype blimp to buzz Weyauwega, but I doubt it.

UFO Photo : Weyauwega, Wisconsin, USA (Waupaca County) - February, 2003

Cheers.

​

 

[Dejan Corovic]

This photo was taken from somebody's back garden in US. It was proven photo was not doctored in any way. What followed was a really weird story involving MIBs. Well worth watch.


View: https://youtu.be/4S8mG2E6cOg

 

[pigfarmer]

That image reminds me of something I've seen before - an insect trap, something commonly found out in the back yard. I've seen it before I just can't remember what it is but probably a trip to Home Depot would resolve that mystery.

 

[Dejan Corovic]

That image reminds me of something I've seen before - an insect trap, something commonly found out in the back yard. I've seen it before I just can't remember what it is but probably a trip to Home Depot would resolve that mystery.

TBH more I looke at it myself more it looks like a jar on thin string.

On the end of the day guy was in his teens and alone at home when he took the photo.

The real question is is it behind or in front of that tree.

Really hard to say.

 

[pigfarmer]

Quite a long time ago the thing I am remembering blew into my backyard so they are apparently easily lifted airborne. My dog at the time lost his mind until I removed it.Kill kill kill. Some bug trap, something you'd find at a garden center.

 

[Dejan Corovic]

OK, I'm thinking loudly an ddithering back and forth. But . . .

. . . on a third thought, I've done enough photographs in my life that I know that object size of a jam jar can not be in focus at 3 ft from camera at a same time as a tree that is 30 ft from that same camera. For both tree and "jar" UFO to be in focus UFO must be much bigger and at a similar distance to the distance to tree. If photo had more resolution maybe would be able to see that branches are in the front of the "jar" UFO and that would seal the deal that UFO was real.

 

[pigfarmer]

Sounds like wishful thinking, if you want to peer at photos have a look at that Calvine case.

 

[Dejan Corovic]

I rarely find interesting UFO images on FaceBook, except this time. There isn't much to go by, except those x3 vertical beams on the 2nd picture that are interesting because they get mentioned a lot in UFO lore.