This is a perplexing development. On one hand, the nod to Col. Corso is preposterous, making me lean in favor of "an elaborate hoax" interpretation. On the other hand, multiple features of the documents resonate perfectly with several statements by Dr. Davis and others, making me lean in favor of their legitimacy. And Puthoff's detailed "no comment" statement, when he and Dr. Davis could have easily denounced them, also makes me sit up and take notice.
It's a very uneasy feeling to get this kind of cognitive dissonance from a release like this, so overall I tend to think that somebody is messing with us. But I want more information before reaching a firm conclusion.