UFOnauts: What they look like...?

nix

Honorable
It was perfectly clear before i posted the ISS astronots video it will be impossible for any of you to accept the possibility that deception went so far. Well, may time show you.
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
YouTube is like quoting Wikipedia in an academic paper. You can't, or shouldn't really, because you can't verify the source. Anybody can edit and post whatever they like. An academic citation is from a 'scholarly' source - a peer reviewed paper or journal, some publication that has professional acceptance of some sort. Google Scholar is handy for that. Submissions for peer review are a vetting process, as opposed to submissions for advertising purposes. YouTube is like panning for gold, for every 'keeper' there's an awful lot that has to be tossed.
 

nix

Honorable
Ah, blindness and willing slavery. The "it's on youtube" "argument". Nevermind that more than half of these are NASA materials, not edited in anyway except maybe contrast corrected to reverse the washing out details by reducing contrast to minimum and increasing brightness, good old techniques NASA perfected, just like flipping, airbrushing etc. And others are footages from honest Earth based astronomers. Let's take the third video, that photo is from NASA, easy to check, is that a natural formation. Same for all the rest. Blindness.
 
Last edited:

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
Ah. Critical thinking, actually citing credible sources. You're right, probably a waste of time. When did that sort of thinking ever get anyone anywhere?

I imagine you'll be paying close attention to the current Artemis mission. Of course only YouTube will have the 'correct' imagery not what's actually released by the space agency. You know, by the people who actually sent the giant moon rocket to the moon to begin with. I imagine it's a all a hoax anyway
 

nix

Honorable
Ah, more typical blindness. What you call "critical thinking" is "critical lack of thinking". "Citing credible sources" like who - official NASA narrative, are you really THAT blind and naive. Obviously you are. Moreover, materials are theirs + amateur telescopic footage clearly showing artificial structures.

Sure, it's a waste of time for the blind like you and owner of the forum who upvoted your post. You are both incapable of thinking.

More sarcasm and suggesting NASA's honesty is but further proof of your blindness but nothing else is to be expected.

Long before Apollo went to the Moon, since late 50s, black military projects have already been on the Moon - not with rockets but field propulsion which was perfected.

You are blind blind blind, may time show you.
 

wwkirk

Divine
Ah, more typical blindness. What you call "critical thinking" is "critical lack of thinking". "Citing credible sources" like who - official NASA narrative, are you really THAT blind and naive. Obviously you are. Moreover, materials are theirs + amateur telescopic footage clearly showing artificial structures.

Sure, it's a waste of time for the blind like you and owner of the forum who upvoted your post. You are both incapable of thinking.

More sarcasm and suggesting NASA's honesty is but further proof of your blindness but nothing else is to be expected.

Long before Apollo went to the Moon, since late 50s, black military projects have already been on the Moon - not with rockets but field propulsion which was perfected.

You are blind blind blind, may time show you.
popcorn-snl.gif
 

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
Thing is, I really have no problem with the idea of finding alien 'technosignatures' on the moon or anywhere else - except maybe YouTube :)

Active ones, no not really. I mean, I can see the damned thing right up there in the sky seas and all. Sometimes I feel the need to throw rocks at it, even howl.

BUT - it wouldn't surprise me at all if at some point we do discover evidence of non-terrestrial activity like a mining operation. If you want to get into some weird *** have a look at Bruce Fenton. The weird stuff comes in part 4, they're not overly long and you don't have to subscribe to read it. But you do have to read 1-3 to see what he's getting at. In part 4 he talks about giving imagery of Ceres to an AI and it found some surprising things. Worth a look.

Technosignatures: The Search For Alien Technologies - 1

You want a YouTube taste of what the man is saying have a look - but it was done before he wrote part 4. This is what got me looking at him in the first place.



Ideas of this sort have been around a while. One of my favorite book series is based on it.
1668850497474.jpeg
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Sure, it's a waste of time for the blind like you and owner of the forum who upvoted your post. You are both incapable of thinking.

There's no such thing as upvoting a post here, liking something written in a post is quite different...I've liked some of your posts and used that very same like icon on your posts as I have on other's posts...Pulling me into your reasoning and rational thought processes doesn't give your argument any more merit than if you leave me out of it...I read posts and like posts from whomever it is, same as you, its not taking sides and to see it that way is a bit immature IMO but it happens...

...
 

nix

Honorable
There's no such thing as upvoting a post here, liking something written in a post is quite different...I've liked some of your posts and used that very same like icon on your posts as I have on other's posts...Pulling me into your reasoning and rational thought processes doesn't give your argument any more merit than if you leave me out of it...I read posts and like posts from whomever it is, same as you, its not taking sides and to see it that way is a bit immature IMO but it happens...

...
Liking is upvoting. Firstly you like the comment of an blind/ignorant guy denying that Moon is inhabited. And then you like my post calling him and you blind. It is indeed immature to like a post in which i said you're incapable of thinking. Reminds me of typical immature behavior. You now claim you don't take sides, how bout you make your stance, is the Moon inhabited right now. I don't know does not cut it, yes or no, your opinion.
 

nix

Honorable
Thing is, I really have no problem with the idea of finding alien 'technosignatures' on the moon or anywhere else - except maybe YouTube :)

Active ones, no not really. I mean, I can see the damned thing right up there in the sky seas and all. Sometimes I feel the need to throw rocks at it, even howl.

BUT - it wouldn't surprise me at all if at some point we do discover evidence of non-terrestrial activity like a mining operation. If you want to get into some weird *** have a look at Bruce Fenton. The weird stuff comes in part 4, they're not overly long and you don't have to subscribe to read it. But you do have to read 1-3 to see what he's getting at. In part 4 he talks about giving imagery of Ceres to an AI and it found some surprising things. Worth a look.

Technosignatures: The Search For Alien Technologies - 1

You want a YouTube taste of what the man is saying have a look - but it was done before he wrote part 4. This is what got me looking at him in the first place.



Ideas of this sort have been around a while. One of my favorite book series is based on it.
View attachment 17400


This attitude dimissing anything on youtube just cause it's on youtube is laughable. Before all your dear NASA is a big channel on youtube with 11 million subs.

As for the rest, to be so blind despite all materials shown, my my. He can see the Moon so he "knows" there is no active civilization. My my, infinite blindness. Near side is FULL of activity, full of cities and installations, huge towers one of which is clearly shown in amateur footage above, not to mention the far side.

In my estimation present day population of the Moon numbers in few hundred million or more.

One day you will grow out of blindness, but surely not by your own effort and capabilities, only when it is spoon fed to you by authorities and for that you're gonna wait a long long time.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Liking is upvoting. Firstly you like the comment of an blind/ignorant guy denying that Moon is inhabited. And then you like my post calling him and you blind. It is indeed immature to like a post in which i said you're incapable of thinking. Reminds me of typical immature behavior. You now claim you don't take sides, how bout you make your stance, is the Moon inhabited right now. I don't know does not cut it, yes or no, your opinion.

Sigh, good luck with that, I was just being polite...Carry on wallowing in your negativity...

I've never been to the moon so I can't say if its inhabited or not so I cannot give you a yes or no, I have seen no concrete proof of any inhabitants there...

...
 

nix

Honorable
Sigh, good luck with that, I was just being polite...Carry on wallowing in your negativity...

I've never been to the moon so I can't say if its inhabited or not so I cannot give you a yes or no, I have seen no concrete proof of any inhabitants there...

...
Ah the projections. Liking posts you clearly disagree with is typical troll behavior, and then claiming you were just being polite. Hypocrisy.

There, despite massive amount of proof of artificial structures, ufo activity etc, you claim you have not seen concrete proof of any inhabitants. Well, what can i say but you are blind despite healthy eyes.

I am polite and i only spoke the truth, Moon is very much inhabited and has been so for a long long time. If i call you blind it is just saying the Truth.

You are just projecting. YOU can "Carry on wallowing in your negativity".

EDIT: There, pigfarmer clicked Agree also in troll manner, why am i not surprized.
But nevermind me, prepare for a cold shower.
 
Last edited:

pigfarmer

tall, thin, irritable
So if I don’t agree with the blurry videos I’m blind. OK, fair enough. I did offer a point of discussion but you’re already bent. Also understandable.

So you think the moon has a large population. I guess there’s nothing left but the mocking. That’s fucking nuts
 

nix

Honorable
Ah "blurry videos", do they need to be 4K for you to see the obvious, they are more than good enough to see they're artificial structures, + all the tampering NASA has done to hide what's there, and it's not just one it's one big body of evidence - that's why you're blind. You stated your stance - no active life, possible remnants, so i can say you are "bent" that way not offering point of discussion, just your opinion. My stance is there is active life - for sure. I been studying this for more than 10 years and i saw from the very beginning it is so.

To you the fact that Moon has a large population sounds like mocking. What can i say. You are not ready for the Truth.
 
Top