Distress Calls From Amelia Earhart Week After Crash Appear To Be Real

nivek

As Above So Below
Distress Calls From Amelia Earhart Week After Crash Appear To Be Real

The mysterious 1937 disappearance of aviator Amelia Earhart just got a little less mysterious as 81-year-old evidence that she and navigator Fred Noonan survived a crash on a small, uninhabited island in the Pacific and lived there for at least six days strongly appears to be legitimate. Will the evidence lead investigators to the crash site and the resolution of one of the greatest searches of the 21st century?
Can you read me? Can you read me? This is Amelia Earhart. This is Amelia Earhart. Please come in.
amelia-earhart-393765_640.jpg


The evidence comes from a three-part study called “The 2018 Post-Loss Radio Signals Analysis.” Conducted by The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR), it describes research on the radio distress calls heard in the days following Earhart’s disappearance. While dozens of people claimed to have heard transmissions that sounded like they were made by Earhart, many of the calls were discounted as hoaxes, transmissions from search parties looking for them or of too poor quality to be proven legitimate. The study provides other evidence that it claims is proof of the validity of 57 reported receptions of the calls.
Will have to get out of here. We can’t stay here long.
Richard Gillespie, executive director of TIGHAR and noted Earhart researcher, collected and cataloged over 100 reports by individuals and government agencies in North America and around the world who claimed to have heard distress calls. In an interview with USA Today, Gillespie says the key to identifying legitimate signals was not their quality but their timing. Specifically, if Earhart and Noonan had indeed crashed on a small island while attempting to land on a flat part – most likely the beach – they would have had to make their transmissions during low tide periods when their engine was dry enough to power their radio.
Night after night, the credible transmissions occurred only when the water level was low enough.
Gillespie used tidal data collected from the Niku V expedition he headed in 2007 that visited Gardner Island (now Nikumaroro in the Republic of Kiribati) which is one of the islands given a high probability of being the location of the crash. Knowing that low tide occurred between late evening and early morning, he searched through the 100 calls reported in the week following the disappearance and found 57 whose reported time-of-reception occurred within those hours. Many of those reports were well-documented by those who heard them, either in newspaper reports or in personal diaries and notebooks. The interest in Earhart’s flight and disappearance was obviously important enough to citizens of North America and the world to be that concerned about helping find her and recording the search.
We have taken in water, my navigator is badly hurt … we are in need of medical care and must have help. We can’t hold on much longer.
earhart-570x738.jpg


Gillespie says he found the language and details consistent when the calls appeared to have been heard by multiple people at the same time. They also seemed to chronologically report worsening conditions until they stopped after six days.

Is this conclusive proof that Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan crashed on a Pacific island on July 2, 1937, survived and made many distress calls for six days? The case appears to be strong. Did they crash on Gardner Island? This new study still doesn’t prove that.

Only remains of the couple or their plane will ultimately solve the mystery of the disappearance of Amelia Earhart.

.
 
None of this is new, of course. TIGHAR is pretty much a sad joke, in my opinion. It's founder and generally obnoxious owner knows how to get press coverage and fat donations, but he's full of shit. In my opinion.

It has been quite a while since I looked at any of this, but as intriguing as the reported messages are, there are plenty of reasons to strongly suspect hoaxes of one kind or another. The people running the search were of course aware of them. Technical limitations of the equipment on that Electra make most of the claims highly unlikely, even if the plane made it onto an island intact.

Gillespie is guilty of one of my pet peeves: assuming all the investigators and searchers involved in the events were stupid, incompetent, drunk, or all three. That's just bullshit. Look into his organization's success at the activity it gets its name from, recovery of lost aircraft, for a good laugh.

The Earhart mystery is a good one to pour lots of time into. Fascinating stuff that has been "explained" countless times. Dozens of contradictory stories from "eye witnesses". Fred Goerner's book is a good place to start. It was written in the 60s, Goerner was a real journalist, and he made some interesting discoveries. His work was done before the waters were hopelessly polluted with all sorts of silly crap. There's even a book by a couple of proto-conspiracy nuts, full of just what one might expect. There's proof--PROOF!--of a government conspiracy in the form of a publicity photo of Earhart and Noonan in front of a plane that, on close inspection, could not have been Earhart's Electra. Yeah, that really nails it, boys.

And now I'm off, down that rabbit hole once again to see if there is anything actually new or interesting...
 

nivek

As Above So Below
And now I'm off, down that rabbit hole once again to see if there is anything actually new or interesting...

Its infinitesimally deep and winding with many complex connections and offshoots, venturing too far down one may end up somewhere completely unexpected and possibly encounter many strange creatures or if you go deep enough have surreal experiences...Be careful, it could be a rough trip...

963a91cad03b5d7b75f38eb3b228dbea.jpg
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
Based one what I've seen and heard a crash landing on Gardner Island is most likely.....I wouldn't be at all surprised if people did hear her distress calls.
 
The island was searched, flown over by a navy plane off a carrier, iirc. Made a couple of circuits of the bit of land, reported signs of recent occupation, but somehow missed frantic waving by survivors, or a twin engine plane anywhere in the area. Gillespie read logs and stuff, found out there had been a party on the ship the night before, and decided the pilot and his observer were hung over or something. Unfortunately, that sort of nonsense is typical of his "research". It goes on and on like that.

The Electra didn't have much for an antenna, this was 1937 and radios had tubes, which took enormous power, especially when the inverters to make the required voltage were about 30% efficient. So the plane had to have landed and not crashed, more or less, in order for the radio to work at all, let alone make multiple transmissions. Then the plane hid somewhere when the navy pilot went over.

This is from memory, years since I've looked at any of it, so I'm probably wrong about some details, but Gillespie's logic reminds me a lot of the flat earthers, moon hoax bullshit, and that sort of thing. If he manages to find proof of his rube goldberg "theory" I'll be astonished.
 
Top