To focus on the theme of the
clouds, here is an excerpt in which we can see the indistinct nature of Jesus' return on/in a
'cloud' (ET ship). The Bible says that Jesus is coming ON the clouds (Matthew 24), IN clouds (Mark 13) or IN A cloud (Luke 21):
Matthew 24:30
Then will APPEAR the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth mourn when they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.
Mark 13:26
At that time will people see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory. Luke 21:27
At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
Why was the word
cloud the only word used by the writers of the Bible to talk about alien spacecraft?
The word
'saucer' was coined in 1947 by a journalist interviewing Kenneth Arnold, a witness of nine unidentified flying objects.
John, in the Apocalypse, for example, has not focused on the
'saucers' but on the presence of Christ and the angels, and the fate of humanity. Furthermore, no scene of Apocalypse does involve a ship itself, but speaks about
'clouds'.
John, therefore, does not have the opportunity to describe anything. In the Bible, the word
cloud has emerged because that is what is the most approaching word to describe vessels AND, particularly when they are themselves surrounded by real clouds!
This word
cloud has become generic. It's like when you talk about
knots to mention the speed of a boat. The boats pilots do not place anymore a rope with knots in the water to count the remaining number of knots in a given duration. Yet the term has stuck. It even entered the aero ... nautics' vocabulary. And aircraft have nothing to do with boats. But jet pilots give their speed in...KNOTS!
Again, avoid to stay in an approach too
'nuts and bolts'. True ET ships are apparently far more nebulous than we believe. Not to admit the superiorly logical UFO version, exegetes withdraw into real clouds or symbols.
How can we be sitting on a real cloud? What physical law is implemented? Have we seen the true size of a cloud, even a small cloud? At what altitude do we think that a true cloud is? How, then, the distance that separates the observer from the angel (alien) indicates whether the person is sitting or standing, knowing that the outline of the clouds is moving, imprecise and wispy? Especially as to see an angel sitting, it is necessary that the cloud is far enough to see part of the top of the cloud ON which the person is seated. Provided that the person sitting on it is on the edge of the cloud, and not in the middle at the top. Why did the witnesses in the Bible NEVER indicate that angels, the Lord, or whoever, are sitting on the edge?
What do
pure, heavenly and supernatural mean to some people believing to be the best meaning of these clouds? There are meaningless words! Moreover, notice that the
clouds of the Bible are rarely described according to color. White is an exception. This can even specify the brightness of the vessel.
Michael and Satan are ETs. The first one is kind, the other malicious. In few months, or weeks, they will fight over our heads. A few tens or hundreds of kilometers above us. The vessels of their armies will initially be invisible, and, for technical reasons will be visible to our human eyes. Satan will be cast down to Earth, as mentioned in Rev 12, because he will lose his fleet and will be forced to incarnate in a being to retain power over men. Christ was incarnated. Why not Satan?
The
clouds ... and the
angels ... an impressive number of verses in both the Old and the New Testament clearly describe them as paranormal, while in a physical context. Even if the Apocalypse and the Testaments are just a figment of the imagination of a man, it remains true that the prophecies are coherent because they correspond to the recent history in the episode of the 10 British kings, including 7 kings George, whose emblem is a red dragon.
Note that John had a glimpse of the coats of arms of the British monarchy and the City of London, like one could have in any vision. He transposed them as he was able to do.
From there, the ball of wool can be learned and see where it leads. That's what I did. If I did extract only one or two examples, my work would have no value. But there are 74 verses with paranormal
clouds, and 83 with physical angels. And the Apocalypse has a new meaning when setting objective and prosaic meanings to allegories and symbols that the reality of the 21th century reveals.
So nothing too surprising that a paranormal
CLOUD would remain as a simple CLOUD in the language with common characteristics with single clouds. Given the hundreds of thousands of testimonies, there is a very large amount of UFO categories, from the intangible (lights) to the material equipment (vessels).
We just lengthily spoke about the
clouds / alien ships in the whole Bible. But what about the
clouds in the Apocalypse, in the prophecies of Christ?
Here are the verses of the Book of Revelation talking about the
clouds (look how the first verse speaks of the reincarnation (
those who pierced him 2,000 years ago will see Christ returning now) since the Book of Revelation is a book of prophecies):
1:7
Look, he is coming with the clouds,” and “every eye will see him, even those who pierced him”; and all peoples on earth “will mourn because of him.” So shall it be! Amen.
10:1
Then I saw another mighty angel coming down from heaven. He was robed in a cloud, with a rainbow above his head; his face was like the sun, and his legs were like fiery pillars.
11:12
Then they heard a loud voice from heaven saying to them, “Come up here.” And they went up to heaven in a cloud, while their enemies looked on.
14:14
I looked, and there before me was a white cloud, and seated on the cloud was one like a son of man with a crown of gold on his head and a sharp sickle in his hand.
14:15
"Then another angel came out of the temple and called in a loud voice to him who was sitting on the cloud, “Take your sickle and reap, because the time to reap has come, for the harvest of the earth is ripe.”
14:16
So he who was seated on the cloud swung his sickle over the earth, and the earth was harvested.
The selection of the
'clouds' in the Book of Revelation alone is necessarily truncated compared to all the paranormal
clouds of the Bible, but attests to a thing absolutely clear: THE
CLOUDS ARE NOT IN THE STRICT SENSE OF THE TERM.
What physical phenomena enables someone to go up, to sit on, or come with the
clouds, if
clouds are just clouds? If it is not a physical phenomena but a symbol, why climb, sit or come with a symbol? According to some people the imagery of a Supreme God consists in seeing Him on / in / with a cloud, and, as a result, the modern UFO version would be superfluous.
The problem is that we put things in reverse. The origin of God is in the Old Testament, which comes from the Sumerian civilization where we find so many gods. The vast majority of the paranormal
clouds is in the Old Testament! Over time, GOD
S HAVE BECOME GOD! ONE GOD. THAT OF THE ISRAELITES. Moreover, one of the 10 commandments is:
'You shall worship only ONE GOD!'
But the Old Testament is the scene of a very large amount of UFO events.
Thus, when the writers of the Gospels and the Apocalypse repeat the same words (clouds, angels, etc.), they refer to a phraseology been established for AGES! 15 centuries or more. Their technological level has not changed, they had no reason to name them differently.
In other words, UFOs and the Gods were there long before the appearance of the image of one God as understood today, the one we conceived in the Christian era.
In addition, many people make a quite common mistake about the
pillars of fire. They do not come from any rocket, but a discoid craft, like many UFO witnesses have reported. THESE ARE LIGHT BEAMS UNDER THE SHIPS!
But this light is a coherent light, and therefore extremely powerful, reminiscent of fire. Again, the ancients had no suitable words. They proceeded by comparison. Moreover, the Old Testament talks about people coming in and out of the
pillars of fire. How to get out of the fire...alive?
Listen to a child expressing what he saw or heard. You will find that his vocabulary is poor. He will describe what he saw with the same words for rather different situations. For us, the elders were like our children today, with a reduced vocabulary to their field of knowledge. For example, being
transported in spirit is to be abducted since the sensations of the body are reduced to their simplest expressions in such a situation. Abductees speak of paralysis. This term was not known. To the question of why poetry is used, if it is just about describing beings like us, the truth is that such beings are described like us when they are materialized on Earth.
When John describes what he sees in the Apocalypse (Book of Revelation), he is in a state that could be called mystical. He perceives sounds and colors not found on Earth, in the material world. For example, in astral travel, it is recognized that we see 360° degrees around, we perceive new colors, the light is everywhere, and the characteristics of objects and beings are very different.
Science can explain these phenomena. But only poetry can account for what the physical eyes can not see. Moreover, the
chariots are vehicles on Earth, while
clouds are in the sky. This is why it is more natural to speak of
clouds that float. Although some writings express the idea of a vehicle through the word
'chariot'.
But these vehicles are ET vessels which can appear and disappear on spot, which distance them from any form of known and conventional vehicles. Many refer to
Star Trek, but these old UFOs DID NOT HAVE the features of the
Enterprise AT ALL. The vessels are sometimes physical, sometimes bright and mostly invisible.
The
Enterprise uses the laws of physics with a traditional inertial propulsion (mass ejection by reaction creating a movement of the vehicle from which comes that matter). While the real alien ships use physical laws much more advanced, those of an altered space-time through which the vessel becomes DEMATERIALIZED, i.e. a wave state.
'Matter' has two states:
vibrational or corpuscular!
The ETs' ships can reach a coherent vibrational state without apparent matter from our point of view. Perceptions and phenomena change, therefore, dramatically.
Christ did not tell John, in the Book of Revelation, what were the
clouds because John did not have sufficient technical knowledge. In addition, John was a Bible scholar for his time. He knew well the Old Testament and all its
clouds. He knew what they were, what they did, but did not know how they worked. He also had no need to know. Who really knows how the planes fly? Most of the people believe that the wings compress the air when it's the depression ABOVE the wings that mainly
'bears' the plane. What about any electrical device or smartphone? What about much more complicated equipments?
The point is that the Apocalypse is talking about the same
clouds and
angels that came in the first place in the Old Testament...with its numerous ETs and ET multidimensional spaceships.
THE BOOK OF REVELATION IS THEREFORE TALKING ABOUT A MASSIVE ALIEN INTERVENTION SINCE THE WORD 'ANGEL' IS REPEATED 80 TIMES.
It's time now to see the evidences showing that the angels of the Bible are aliens.
I realized the same work for the word
'angels' in the Scriptures that I did for the
'clouds' to show that the
angels are extraterrestrials able to materialize and dematerialize at will. There are 290 verses that include the word
angel. Of these 290 verses I have ordered 83 which show that:
1) the angels PHYSICALLY interact with humans,
2) they have SUPERNATURAL POWERS and TECHNOLOGIES ('swords', 'vessels') to:
a) appear and disappear,
b) strike humans, armies and cities,
c) go up and down in the sky,
d) release someone from prison,
e) and many other faculties.
However, here or there (last category below), I noted instances where a dream intervenes to make the difference with other situations in which there is no dream at all, that is to say 95% of the cases. I have NOT taken into account:
1) every conversation the angels have with humans that do not clearly shows that they physically interact with people.
2) all cases showing that some angels may be malicious and judged by God. Because the vast majority of the angels is benevolent. SO THERE ARE
ONLY BENEVOLENT ETS, I.E.
ANGELS OF GOD, IN THIS LIST!
John evokes the angels 80 times in the Apocalypse (words and deeds), showing that the End Times is a massive intervention of
angels / aliens into the humanity's history.
.png "Eyes Sparkle :sparkle:")
.png "Kiss the air :kiss2:")
.png "Sad :sad1:")
