nivek
As Above So Below
It could be alien activity of some sort, obviously because of the UFO seen, these kind of large events are never paranormal...
...
It's a hugely more complicated problem than that. Even if you could accelerate charged particles to speeds very close to the speed of light in some kind of vortex, the centripetal acceleration would pull the particles away from the center and you'd lose containment long before you could generate a detectable gravitational field.
Think about it: it takes the entire rest mass of the Earth to produce an acceleration of 1g. Trying to relativistically increase the mass of ions to that magnitude would require the energy equivalent of the Earth's mass, which is vastly beyond any foreseeable human technology.
And even if you could do such a thing, it wouldn't generate any directional motion, because the conservation of momentum still applies. The only way to get around that is by using an equal magnitude of negative energy,
and if that actually exists, we only know of very tiny scales of negative energy, like we find with the Casimir effect. Alternatively, you could induce negative values in the pressure terms of the stress-energy tensor; recent theoretical work on photonic metamaterials has revealed tension (negative pressure) terms in these materials under photonic activation when they possess a triangular microstructure.. But those terms have a very small value - we have no idea how to make them so large that they surpass the positive rest mass of the material to produce a net negative inertial/gravitational mass.
In any case, we're confronted with a key requisite for ever achieving gravitational field propulsion: we have to figure out how to attenuate the coupling constant between mass-energy and spacetime, aka, the Einstein constant. Nobody really has any idea how to do that, although Robert L. Forward, and more recently Jack Sarfatti, have proposed some interesting ideas in that direction (though frankly I'm highly skeptical of Dr. Sarfatti's proposal for low-power warp drive).
It's probably safe to say that gravitational field propulsion is the most daunting problem in theoretical physics. I probably wouldn't even entertain the possibility of ever achieving it, if I hadn't seen it with my own two eyes as a child, when two aerial objects executed zig-zag maneuvers in perfect formation at thousands of miles per hour in the clear daytime sky, as the neighborhood kids and I stared awestruck by the performance.
Gravity is magnetism
When the magnetic field is increased then it is reasonable to think that the strength of the gravitational field will also increase, and this increase is measured by the cube. Which brings us to the next assumption about gravity.
Why are you making that assumption? You don't need to recreate the relative mass of the entire planet, only the mass relative to the mass of the material you wish to levitate is what is called for, or alternatively you might find a way to decrease the mass as has been hypothetically formulated
Wow. You are a new Einstein. Do you care to share how did you get that one?
I think you are in an urgent need of reality check. Do you have a faintest idea about how much 'magnetism' do you need to pull off just 1g? Can you please show us your calculations, that would support what you are talking about.
Well, if your spaceship is visiting Earth to chase some abductees, than you need to produce at least 1g. That is, if you want just to hover in one spot and wait for air deffence to come and blow you up. If you want to avoid inevitable mingle with Earthlings' military, you'll be in a dire need of 10g++.
Producing 0.000001g would be of a great value in laboratory, though.
I don't know much abut this video, but it looks very genuine to me.
I don't know much abut this video, but it looks very genuine to me.
i am sorry, but this is a know old cgi fake that has been in the internet since at least 2008
i don't remenber where to find it anymore, just that back in 2008-2009 there were a bunch of links talking about how its fakedo you have a link to the original? something? never saw any debunking of this video before.
i don't remenber where to find it anymore, just that back in 2008-2009 there were a bunch of links talking about how its fake
maybe some of the internet wizards here can help us?
i ain't lyingnot enough there to convince me sorry dude real deal!
if you pause the video frame by frame when it disappears you can see the UFO briefly glitch out
somewhere in the 0:55 to 0:56 periodWould it be possible for you to capture the exact frame where you think it glitches out and post it here, or at least tell me the video time where it happens so I can have a look.
i ain't lying
well i do remenber the svreenshot the post showed of the glitchdidnt say you did dude maybe the skeptics u heard it from were lying.
also i noticed another anomaly: the UFO doesn't follows the camera panning around, making it jerk around in the sky
yes, its stuck to a specific point in the skyI dont understand what are you saying? its stuck?
yes, its stuck to a specific point in the sky
a common cgi error
the UFO briefly glitch out