You post this bullshit just to get a rise out of me don't you?
What really concerns me is the watering down of the term "scientist".
Pretty soon "scientist" and "dumbass" are going to be synonymous.
A better name is bullscience.No not exactly. It was on the news feed so I used it. Topical issue one way or the other. I call them scientificos.
Land temperatures is sort of spotty until the satellite era. Changed thermometers a couple of times.How long have we been recording temperatures?...
A rhetorical question obviously, earth has a long history, we dont...
Land temperatures is sort of spotty until the satellite era. Changed thermometers a couple of times.
Ocean temperatures, again the measurement method changed a couple of times. Really don't have solid data until about 1993.
The "warmest ever" claim isn't statistically significant.
The Paris target requires us to give up known benefits for no good reason.
you are both right and wrong: you are wrong that climate change is fakeYou post this bullshit just to get a rise out of me don't you?
What really concerns me is the watering down of the term "scientist".
Pretty soon "scientist" and "dumbass" are going to be synonymous.
bullscience is crap like new age or "quamtum" peopleA better name is bullscience.
you have been sucefully just like a bunch of other people brainwashed by "the man", the conspiracy movement is doomedLand temperatures is sort of spotty until the satellite era. Changed thermometers a couple of times.
Ocean temperatures, again the measurement method changed a couple of times. Really don't have solid data until about 1993.
Error in global temperature is +/- .25K. If poltted to scale there is no noticable change. Subtracting 288K (on average) doesn't eliminate the error.
The "warmest ever" claim isn't statistically significant.
Worse yet even the IPCC admits 2-3°C of warming is beneficial.
The Paris target requires us to give up known benefits for no good reason.
That is why I get so upset with progressives that I want to beat some sense into them, and occasionally do.
we are the cause!We are still learning about the earth, we have little data to go on and we humans have only been on earth for a very short time in its long history, it's ignorant to think we are the sole cause of climate changes...
Nope it's very insignificant and an unimportant bit of statistics...
The Paris debacle is all about seizure and control, not about helping the planet...
nope the opositte its the way to fight back the oil overlords that want to take over the world!The Paris debacle is all about seizure and control, not about helping the planet...
i dont want to be devil's advocate but yeah climate change is real
people claiming it isnt is just an way to cover up the truth about fossil fuels
dont believe what the huge corporate men in suits tell you, they also told you to believe that free energy is impossible
these people are slowy taking over the world
How long have we been recording temperatures?...
A rhetorical question obviously, earth has a long history, we dont...
we are the cause!
look at how mother earth is dying and attacking us back with hurricanes and earthquakes!
the universe is pissed
either we find the way back or we die
Not even remotely so, hurricanes and earthquakes are natural and not caused by man or mankind's activities, we may die of our own doing but the earth will live on...
We are not causing climate change, it's a natural occurrence...I've never doubted climate change but seriously doubt mankind's activities are causing it, there is little evidence to support that...The Paris debacle will shackle the world, it's an abomination...
Not even remotely so, hurricanes and earthquakes