Area201
cold fusion
People can Talk to me about an interglacial Ice age and being kind of a scientific fact.
Even Nivek here accepts that man made -is a factor- contributing to the equation. Besides the obvious spike in CO2 since the industrial evolution, (weather you are riding the Interglacial Ice Age train or Global Warming Train), now that's a fact. The question is, how much of an effect does man have to adversely accelerate the equation - with cutting down trees and taking CO2 out of the ground - on top of the natural cycle and natural forces of nature such as the sun activity. And the answer Musk provides in the video below - it's a stupid gamble and the sooner we transition the better.
I don't know where Casual is pulling his charts out of, but doesn't take a chart to see the ocean's reefs are dying. Why? "Presently, oceans are CO2 sinks, and represent the largest active carbon sink on Earth, absorbing more than a quarter of the carbon dioxide that humans put into the air. The solubility pump is the primary mechanism responsible for the CO2 absorption by the oceans." -wiki
Someone who's created technologically ahead of the curve companies to put man on Mars - SpaceX, Tesla, PayPal, Boring - explains - a real idiot /s. Does he want to profit from his ventures? OF COURSE. Is that wrong or make his claims wrong? OF COURSE NOT. Naturally the smart guys quit Trump's science team given he is so anti-science, and lacking any long term global objectives.
At least we got @Thomas R. Morrison here to counter these misdirected claims and charts shown. It reminds me when Cruz was telling everyone how the "satellite data" is showing we are cooling, cherry picking the one data that supports his asinine view, and ignoring all others.
Pozdrawiam wszystkich
Climate change is happening. Problem is that it is not caused by human activity, but by natural changes. At various times Earth was much hotter or much colder than now. By insisting on false story that humans caused warming we are risking wrong allocation of resources for remedy and making situation worse.
Even Nivek here accepts that man made -is a factor- contributing to the equation. Besides the obvious spike in CO2 since the industrial evolution, (weather you are riding the Interglacial Ice Age train or Global Warming Train), now that's a fact. The question is, how much of an effect does man have to adversely accelerate the equation - with cutting down trees and taking CO2 out of the ground - on top of the natural cycle and natural forces of nature such as the sun activity. And the answer Musk provides in the video below - it's a stupid gamble and the sooner we transition the better.
I don't know where Casual is pulling his charts out of, but doesn't take a chart to see the ocean's reefs are dying. Why? "Presently, oceans are CO2 sinks, and represent the largest active carbon sink on Earth, absorbing more than a quarter of the carbon dioxide that humans put into the air. The solubility pump is the primary mechanism responsible for the CO2 absorption by the oceans." -wiki
Someone who's created technologically ahead of the curve companies to put man on Mars - SpaceX, Tesla, PayPal, Boring - explains - a real idiot /s. Does he want to profit from his ventures? OF COURSE. Is that wrong or make his claims wrong? OF COURSE NOT. Naturally the smart guys quit Trump's science team given he is so anti-science, and lacking any long term global objectives.
At least we got @Thomas R. Morrison here to counter these misdirected claims and charts shown. It reminds me when Cruz was telling everyone how the "satellite data" is showing we are cooling, cherry picking the one data that supports his asinine view, and ignoring all others.
Pozdrawiam wszystkich