Global Cooling or Global Warming?

Climate activists vandalize Stonehenge with orange powder paint​


Climate activists vandalize Stonehenge with orange powder paint



View: https://twitter.com/JenniferPelti16/status/1803431563599704567


.
 
All the major bodies of our Solar System are changing rapidly, but nobody is talking about it. We are seeing rapid observable climate changes occurring on almost every single planet:
  1. Pluto's atmosphere has recently collapsed
  2. Neptune's storms have suddenly begun rotating backwards
  3. Uranus' polar regions have been visibly flaring
  4. Jupiter has recently experienced a 700 degree temperature impulse originating from its northern pole, and its great red spot is fading
  5. Mars is suddenly displaying seismic activity
  6. Our own polar regions have warmed drastically recently, the amount of volcanic activity we are seeing is at an all-time high
  7. Venus's planetary winds have increased their velocity by 33% in the last 20 years
It goes on from there, we've recently observed:
  1. large-scale changes in the ice cover on Jupiter’s moon Europa
  2. large-scale changes in the polar ice cap on Mars
  3. a large-scale decrease in atmospheric pressure on Venus
  4. a mysterious brightening of the atmosphere of Saturn
  5. a mysterious darkening of the atmosphere of Venus
  6. unusual changes in the temperature and pressure of the atmosphere of Neptune
  7. a brightening of the atmosphere of Jupiter
  8. a mysterious dark spot near the South Pole of Venus
Here on earth, our own magnetosphere is rapidly losing it's strength as our magnetic poles continue to race away from their usual positions, wreaking havoc on animal migrations - see all the beached whales over the last couple years as well as a spike in reports of unusual bird migrations. Things have gotten to the point where we are now updating our magnetic models yearly, and soon there will be zones of flux broken bad enough to cause real danger to flying due to constant magnetic reconnection.

Our aurorae are reaching record levels of intensity, with aurorae colorations indicating very high energy intensities being observed. The fundamental electromagnetic nature of this planet is changing rapidly. Electromagnetism is responsible for a variety of effects on living creatures, most especially cardiac and pulmonary health in humans. Volcanic activity on our planet is currently at a record, with more and more volcanoes showing concerning lift, erupting, or showing increases in lava flow. Every single active volcano along the pacific rim is showing increased activity.

Given only one of two data points, it would be easy to discount the events as isolated and unrelated outliers with no significance. Taken together, however, the total body of evidence becomes impossible to ignore, and, once the presumption is made that this information is known by our leaders, pretty much explains the motivations for their actions.



Everything is changing. Nobody is telling you. In fact, they built us a world where these questions are taboo, where every answer leads you away from the glaring, obvious truth - that we live on a planet subject to cyclical cataclysms. Those in power know the next cataclysm is coming soon and have been preparing for a long time. It's just that their plans don't include us.

Btw, this declassified CIA document, "The Adam & Eve Story" by Chan Thomas (pdf download link to 127 pages version; here CIA 57 pages version), reveals that Earth undergoes cataclysmic events (pole shifts) approximately every 6,500 years, leading to the destruction, mass extinctions and rebirth of civilizations.

.
 

Why Earth's Poles Might Flip Sooner Than We're Ready​

Most people think of Earth's magnetic field as a constant force, like gravity or the rotation of our planet. But here's something that might surprise you: In the past 200 years, Earth's magnetic field has weakened about nine percent on a global average.

This isn't just some abstract scientific measurement—it's happening right now, and the speed of this change has researchers genuinely concerned. Recent observations, including the rapid movement of the North magnetic pole towards Siberia and a consistent decrease in field intensity, suggest that another reversal may be underway, potentially starting within 500 to 1,000 years.

Think of it like a massive invisible shield around our planet that's slowly getting thinner, and scientists are only beginning to understand what this means for our future. The magnetic field we depend on for everything from GPS navigation to protection from cosmic radiation might be more fragile than we ever imagined.

Accelerating Movement of the North Magnetic Pole

If you've used a compass recently, you might not realize that magnetic north has been on a wild journey. Historically, the North Pole has moved at about 15 kilometres per year.

But since the 1990s it has sped up, and now is moving at about 55 kilometres per year towards Siberia. It is speculation, but this might foreshadow a 'magnetic reversal' in which the magnetic north and south poles change locations.

That's like the magnetic pole moving the distance from New York to Philadelphia every single year! Because the WMM is crucial for accurate navigation and the Earth's magnetic field changes in unpredictable ways over time, particularly over periods longer than a few years, the WMM is updated at least every five years.

This acceleration isn't just academic curiosity—it's forcing scientists to constantly update navigation systems and recalibrate instruments that millions of people rely on daily. The release forecasts changes in Earth's magnetic field for the next 5 years as the magnetic north pole keeps moving faster leading to important improvements in global navigation systems.

The South Atlantic Anomaly: A Growing Weakness

There's a region over the South Atlantic Ocean that scientists call a "dent" in Earth's magnetic field, and it's growing larger and weaker every year. However, recent observations and forecasts show that the region is expanding westward and continuing to weaken in intensity.

It is also splitting – recent data shows the anomaly's valley, or region of minimum field strength, has split into two lobes, creating additional challenges for satellite missions. This isn't just some distant scientific phenomenon—The region can be hazardous for low-Earth orbit satellites that travel through it.

If a satellite is hit by a high-energy proton, it can short-circuit and cause an event called single event upset or SEU. This can cause the satellite's function to glitch temporarily or can cause permanent damage if a key component is hit.

However, recent observations and forecasts show that the region is expanding westward and continuing to weaken in intensity. Observational data from 2015-2020 found that the SAA has recently started to split from a single valley, or region of minimum field strength, into two cells; and models out to the year 2025 show the split continuing in the future, creating additional challenges for satellite missions.

It's like watching a crack slowly spread across a windshield, except this windshield protects our entire planet.

Satellite Disruptions and Space Technology Threats

Every time the International Space Station passes through the South Atlantic Anomaly, astronauts have to take shelter from increased radiation exposure. The space agency's satellites and spacecraft are particularly vulnerable to the weakened magnetic field strength within the anomaly, and the resulting exposure to charged particles from the Sun.

The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) – likened by NASA to a 'dent' in Earth's magnetic field, or a kind of 'pothole in space' – generally doesn't affect life on Earth, but the same can't be said for orbital spacecraft (including the International Space Station), which pass directly through the anomaly as they loop around the planet at low-Earth orbit altitudes. During these encounters, the reduced magnetic field strength inside the anomaly means technological systems onboard satellites can short-circuit and malfunction if they become struck by high-energy protons emanating from the Sun.

This isn't a hypothetical problem—it's happening right now. Satellites passing through this region experience higher levels of radiation, which can lead to electronic malfunctions and damage.

This can affect satellite performance, communications, and data integrity. Additionally, the anomaly can interfere with global navigation systems, as variations in the magnetic field may influence compass readings and navigation accuracy.

Imagine if your smartphone's GPS suddenly became unreliable, or if weather satellites stopped working during hurricane season—that's the kind of disruption we're already seeing on a smaller scale.

Revolutionary Forecasting Models Reveal Alarming Trends

In a groundbreaking study published on February 3, 2024, a team of scientists led by Daniil Tolmachev introduced a novel approach to predicting Earth's magnetic field reversals. Titled "Predictability of Magnetic Field Reversals," the research utilizes mathematical modeling to identify early warning signals of these geomagnetic phenomena, potentially offering a new paradigm in understanding and preparing for their consequences on technology and life on Earth.

What makes this research particularly startling is that scientists are now finding patterns they never knew existed. Their approach differs from traditional models by not striving to replicate the exact conditions within Earth's outer core but instead identifying fundamental dynamical behaviors indicative of reversals.

Through this methodology, the team has discovered patterns in magnetic and hydrodynamic harmonics that could serve as precursors to polarity switches, offering a predictive insight into when these reversals might occur. It's like finding the warning signs of an earthquake hidden in seemingly random data.

This poses significant risks, from increased solar and cosmic radiation affecting human health and technology to potential impacts on national security and the global economy.

Wildlife Navigation Systems at Risk

Birds, sea turtles, and countless other animals have been using Earth's magnetic field as their GPS system for millions of years, but this natural navigation system is now under threat. Many creatures demonstrate remarkable feats of navigation. The suspicion has therefore arisen that they have some kind of magnetic sense, enabling them to detect the magnetic field lines between the poles. Pinpointing the mechanism, however, has proved difficult.

Recent studies are showing troubling signs that this ancient system is breaking down. In the 1970s, Richard Blakemore, a graduate student in the US, observed single-celled organisms streaming in a fixed direction in a muddy pond and showed they were responding to a magnetic field. Biologists later discovered that such single-celled organisms contain tiny bags of magnetic iron oxide or iron sulphide. Now, Noboru Ikeya and Jonathan Woodward at the University of Tokyo have shown that a magnetic field causes chemical changes that can affect cellular behaviour.

They achieved this with the aid of a cellular chemical that fluoresces depending on the external magnetic field. Our findings reveal that the magnetic fluctuations within the southern auroral oval are significantly weaker in the region that aligns with the SAA. This weakening effect is consistently present, regardless of the season or the level of geomagnetic activity. Scientists are discovering that even aurora patterns—those beautiful lights in the sky—are being disrupted by magnetic field changes, which could affect animals that use these celestial displays for navigation.

Power Grid Vulnerabilities and Infrastructure Threats

The 1989 Quebec blackout serves as a chilling reminder of what happens when geomagnetic storms interact with our power infrastructure, and that was during a time when Earth's magnetic field was much stronger than it is today. The sun's magnetic pole reversals typically bring more intense solar storms, which can cause disruption to satellites, communication and GPS in space and disable parts of the electrical grid, according to Earth Sky.

Not only did the magnetic pole reversal create more vivid (and more southern) northern lights, it "wreaked havoc" on telegraph wires, as the South African National Space Agency described. Specifically, Advances in Space Research wrote, "A significant portion of the world's 200,000 km of telegraph lines were adversely affected," were temporarily unusable and had "a real economic impact." Today's electrical grid is far more complex and vulnerable than those 19th-century telegraph systems.

Power grids face significant risks from geomagnetic disturbances during a pole shift. Utilities are installing protective equipment like series capacitors and neutral ground blockers.

These devices help prevent transformer damage from geomagnetically induced currents. Space weather can have important consequences for our lives, such as interference with radio communication, GPS systems, electric power grids, the operation and orientation of satellites, oil and gas drilling, and even air travel as high altitude pilots and astronauts can be subjected to enhanced levels of radiation.

The Laschamp Event: A Historical Warning

About 41,000 years ago, something extraordinary happened to Earth's magnetic field that offers a terrifying glimpse into our potential future. Approximately 41,000 years ago, Earth's magnetic field reversed during the Laschamp event.

What makes the Laschamp event particularly notable is the dramatic weakening of the magnetic field, which dropped to only 5% of its current strength. This reduction in field strength had significant consequences.

With a much weaker magnetic field, Earth's atmosphere became more susceptible to cosmic rays—high-energy particles from space that can have profound effects on both the atmosphere and life on the planet. Around 41,000 years ago, the Earth's magnetic field flipped and north was south and south was north.

Alongside the upside-down compass, the strength of the Earth's magnetic field almost vanished. This led to a big increase in cosmic and solar particles bombarding our planet because the magnetic field normally acts like a shield, deflecting these charged particles away from the Earth.

Recent research using advanced space plasma analysis has revealed just how chaotic this period was. In the recent geological past, Earth's magnetic field reduced to ~10% of the modern values and the magnetic poles shifted away from the geographic poles, causing the Laschamps geomagnetic excursion, about 41 millennia ago.

The excursion lasted ~2000 years, with dipole strength reduction and tilting spanning 300 years. During this period, the geomagnetic field's multipolarity resembled outer planets, causing rapid magnetospheric changes.

Modern Technology's Unprecedented Vulnerability

If the Laschamp event happened today, it would be an unparalleled disaster for modern civilization. We don't know when the next geomagnetic excursion will be, but if this happened today, it would be very bad news.

Satellites would be rendered useless, our smartphone navigation apps would fail, and there would be major disruptions of our power distribution systems. While life on Earth has weathered multiple magnetic reversals over more than 100 million years, "we've never experienced a reversal when modern technology was present," Brown said.

"It would certainly be an interesting time for engineers to adapt our technology to, but hopefully one they'd have a slow, centuries-long build up to, rather than any sudden change." The difference between ancient magnetic excursions and a future one is staggering—we now have billions of devices that depend on precise magnetic field measurements, from the GPS in your car to the guidance systems of commercial aircraft. One can only imagine what trouble such an event could cause, with more solar and cosmic radiation hitting Earth's surface.

Potentially, we could see an increase in cancer rates, environmental disturbances, and the failure of power grids. It's not just inconvenience we're talking about—it's a potential civilizational crisis.

Scientific Preparation and Mitigation Efforts

Scientists and engineers are working frantically to understand and prepare for these magnetic field changes, but the scale of the challenge is enormous. Preparing for a potential pole shift requires strengthening critical infrastructure and developing protective technologies. Key focus areas include reinforcing power systems and enhancing spacecraft defenses against increased radiation. Grid operators are also implementing advanced monitoring systems.

These detect anomalies and allow for rapid response. Some utilities are stockpiling spare transformers and critical components. But here's the troubling reality: despite these efforts, we're still largely unprepared. There's uncertainty about the effects of a reversal. Some scientists have hypothesized that reversals could trigger extinctions. If Earth's magnetic shield weakens enough during a reversal, the increase in solar radiation could have dire consequences for life on Earth.

But paleointensity evidence shows that the shield doesn't disappear during a reversal and may not weaken enough to be of much consequence. The problem is that we're basing our preparations on incomplete information, trying to protect a hyper-connected technological civilization using models built from geological events that happened before humans even existed.

What's perhaps most unsettling is how quickly everything is changing. The magnetic north pole's acceleration, the South Atlantic Anomaly's expansion, and the overall weakening of our planet's magnetic shield are all happening faster than scientists expected just a decade ago.

We're essentially flying blind into a future where our most basic navigation and communication systems might simply stop working.

.
 

The Gulf Stream is 'closer to collapsing than ever before': Current that stops never-ending winter in Europe has been weakening for 200 YEARS longer than thought, scientists say​

The Gulf Stream has been getting weaker for much longer than we thought – and it could be on the verge of total collapse due to climate change. According to British scientists, the Gulf Stream – which is part of a much wider global system of ocean currents – moved northwards 300 years ago. This, they say, is a sign that it started slowing down then – before the Industrial Revolution and about 200 years earlier than previously believed. And the 'sensitive' system could soon 'cross a tipping point' prior to its total collapse.

The Gulf Stream is a major ocean current that moves warm surface water from Mexico northward across the Atlantic towards Europe. It's one of the most important natural weather systems, keeping northern and western Europe warm. The new study was led by Edward Forman at the University of Southampton and James Baldini at Durham University. They explain that the Gulf Stream is only a small part of a much wider system of currents, officially called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which is being weakened by climate change.

Described as 'the conveyor belt of the ocean', AMOC transports warm, salty water near the ocean's surface northwards from the tropics up to the northern hemisphere. This is crucial for keeping Europe, the UK, and the US east coast 'temperate' – meaning neither very hot nor very cold.

According to the team, when the AMOC weakens (slows down), the Gulf Stream moves northward, crossing the Atlantic at higher latitudes. Their study found that their Gulf Stream moved northward 300 years ago – a sign that the AMOC started slowing down then. If AMOC slows down too much, it could lead to dramatic regional climate change. Northern Europe would experience extreme cooling of up to 15°C, causing winter temperatures to plunge, overriding the warming driven by human activity. Meanwhile, rainfall and weather patterns across the tropics and subtropics either side of the equator would move and intensify.

(More on the link)

The Gulf Stream is 'closer to collapsing than ever before': Current that stops


.
 
Next time you want to win argument based on facts, against a over politicised opponent, go to this free politically independent Swedish site:

Gapminder

www.gapminder.org www.gapminder.org

This is what counts: "Gapminder identifies systematic misconceptions about important global trends and proportions and uses reliable data to develop easy to understand teaching materials to rid people of their misconceptions. Gapminder is an independent Swedish foundation with no political, religious, or economic affiliations."

For starters, there is some good info about global warming. Just click on the button and answer will surprise you.
 

Top MIT scientist blasts 'climate hysteria,' says global warming fears are driven by money... not evidence​

Skepticism about climate change has resurfaced, as some experts claim the exact causes of global warming remain unclear and that the policies addressing it are motivated more by money than by science. Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), has spent decades studying atmospheric science. He told the Daily Mail that the public hysteria surrounding global warming isn't actually based on realistic data.

Climate change is the term used to describe Earth's warming, mainly as a result of human activity, such as burning coal, oil and gas. Scientists and climate activists have warned that this extra warmth could cause more extreme storms, rising seas that flood cities, and hotter summers that make it harder to grow food worldwide - all within the next 25 years.

However, Lindzen said the financial implications of controlling the multi-trillion-dollar energy industry have been the true motivation for politicians to support flawed research that argues small temperature increases will lead to immediate disasters. 'The fact that you have a multi-trillion dollar industry and you have an opportunity to completely overturn it had a great appeal to a lot of politicians,' he explained. 'They go wild on it. Another half degree and we're doomed, and so on. The public knows this is nonsense.' Lindzen explained the basic math behind what he called 'climate alarm.' He said the emphasis on lowering specific emissions like carbon dioxide (CO₂) simply doesn't produce the worldwide temperature changes advocates say it will.

The scientist noted that the planet's temperature has fluctuated significantly throughout recorded history and science still can't definitively prove what the exact cause of both extreme warming and cooling events has been. 'We don't understand the glaciation that occurred in the 15th century. You know, so what was going on then? Inadequate CO₂?' Lindzen said of the event in the Northern Hemisphere known as the Little Ice Age.

According to the International Energy Agency (IAE), the global energy industry is currently worth between $6trillion and $7trillion, with over 80 percent of the energy being consumed worldwide still relying on fossil fuels. Despite clean energy alternatives making up only a small portion of the industry, IAE noted that governments and private companies invested a record $2.2trillion into solar, wind and electric initiatives this year - double the amount going into fossil fuels.

In the US, policymakers have pushed billions into funding climate change projects, including the Biden Administration setting aside $27billion in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund to finance clean energy projects and climate-related causes. Lindzen claimed that CO₂ has been painted by lawmakers as one of the biggest climate villains that energy companies produce, but it's actually a minor greenhouse gas that is beneficial for plant growth. The researcher contended that the worldwide trend of demonizing certain greenhouse gases gave many scientists a 'free pass' to study and support climate change theories, resulting in large financial grants being awarded to their universities.

In recent years, federal agencies in the US have been spending up to $5billion annually on climate research, with the White House's 2024 budget sending $1.6billion to universities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for climate change studies focusing on the imminent natural disasters global warming could cause. Additionally, Lindzen has repeatedly claimed, including on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, that scientists who challenged the inconsistent data on climate change have often had their research rejected by academic papers, or the editors that published their findings were later fired. 'I think it's hopeful that people are beginning to at least question this. It's an anomaly, historically, and it'll be an embarrassment to our era,' Lindzen said of climate change's legacy.

Judith Curry, former chair of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech, was another scientist who claimed that studies finding flaws in climate change models were 'filtered' and rejected by academic papers. In 2011, she alleged to the Daily Mail that one of her own study co-authors had cherry-picked results to emphasize a tiny rise in global temperatures decades ago, while hiding data that warming had stopped for at least 13 years starting in the late 1990s. Published studies have warned that if governments worldwide fail to keep global average temperatures from rising by 2.7°F above pre-industrial levels by 2050, it could trigger unstoppable melting of ice sheets, crop failures and deadly heat waves.

Despite the fear, Lindzen calculated that doubling CO₂ in the air would only raise the world's temperature by about half a degree on its own. However, many of the studies predicting a climate apocalypse also assume that every bit of warming automatically adds more water vapor to the atmosphere, which is a much stronger heat-trapper than CO₂. Lindzen called this assumption wrong, noting that nature typically fights major planetary climate swings, instead of making them worse. His theory, called the Iris effect, suggests that when the tropics get too warm, powerful thunderstorms punch holes in the clouds, opening an 'iris' that lets extra heat escape into space.

This directly counters water vapor's heat-trapping power by reducing the blanket of moisture-rich clouds that would otherwise trap more warmth. Lindzen added that even if every country hit international agreements for 'net zero' emissions by 2050, meaning no more CO₂ from fuel, it would only prevent a tiny fraction of a degree of warming. The global financial cost of complying with strict environmental regulations, however, could run into the hundreds of trillions of dollars, Lindzen warned, calling it a terrible trade-off for almost no gain.

Meanwhile, today's CO₂ levels help plants grow and need less water, making more food possible for billions of people. 'I think we're low in CO₂. In the geological sense, it's much too low. Even the increase in CO₂ we've seen so far has probably increased arable land by 30 to 40 percent,' Lindzen argued. 'We are not causing the imminent crisis that we think that we are,' he claimed.

Other experts, including Bill Gates and environmental think tank leaders, have also questioned some climate alarm assumptions. Despite having reportedly spent roughly $2billion on climate change initiatives over the last decade, the Microsoft founder has reversed course and said world leaders should focus on other global threats, such as nuclear war. Another former climate activist, Ted Nordhaus, also spoke out against what he called the shifting bar for climate alarmism.

The writer and co-founder of the Breakthrough Institute, a nonprofit environmental think tank, revealed that old models predicting global warming disasters this century were often based on the planet warming by roughly 9°F by 2100. When those estimates no longer seemed realistic, largely because of countries adopting cleaner energy policies over time, climate scientists began to warn that only 5°F of warming would cause the same catastrophes. 'The amount of warming that is conceivable even in plausible worst-case scenarios, is not remotely consistent with the sorts of catastrophic outcomes that I once believed in,' Nordhaus wrote in The Free Press in October.

.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top