I feel no need to believe that any one picture of a UFO is authentic or not. Yes, I have read countless articles supporting the Trent photos. I have also read Bruce Maccabee's very long analysis supporting the Gulf Breeze photos and I have even read an extremely long technical document supporting the Eduard Meier photos...
If you wish to believe any of these cases then you have people that will support them with endless technical analysis. But I know of few objective photographers that have not already a belief in UFOs that do.
If you ask for my opinion based on decades of looking at hundreds - if not thousands - of UFO pictures, I can give it. But if you have your mind made up already, that is fine too.
But as far as the Trent pictures, discussion would be better suited on the Trent thread. I only came here to address the Kibel picture and the fact that my article was quoted here.
If you wish to believe any of these cases then you have people that will support them with endless technical analysis. But I know of few objective photographers that have not already a belief in UFOs that do.
If you ask for my opinion based on decades of looking at hundreds - if not thousands - of UFO pictures, I can give it. But if you have your mind made up already, that is fine too.
But as far as the Trent pictures, discussion would be better suited on the Trent thread. I only came here to address the Kibel picture and the fact that my article was quoted here.