You're speaking Australian again.
I had to look up what a cattle station is. You mean a ranch.
The current largest Australian cattle ranch is about 7 times large than the largest US ranch. It is only the size of Israel. But it is located in Australia where property values are much lower.
Anna Creek Station is only 9,140 square miles (it is something more in square kilometers). Texas is 268,581 square miles (29 times larger). Australia is 2,967,892 miles (2,942,282 square miles with the water removed). So to be true your "cattle station the size of Texas" would have to be 1/11th of Australia.
List of the largest stations in Australia - Wikipedia
There is apparently some dispute about the size of Anna Creek Station. There are two different sizes given. This either means that Australians are really shitty surveyors, or the 9,400 square miles includes leased land.
Further in 2007 it only had 1500 cattle. That is one cow for every 6 square miles.
The King Ranch has over 23,000 head (more than twice the current number on the Australian ranch) and at times has branded 25,000 head. It probably has more than 23,000 asses as well.
Ummm Why are we getting into a pissing contest about whose D%$k is biggest here CB?
Are we not talking about Aboriginal Territory, I used the example I did because Australia can be very big, and the whole significance of that was the desolation and the need for Aboriginals to travel long distances on walkabout.
Thus giving the impression of being Nomadic, as compared to having large claims of land that take a long time to get from one waterhole to the next.
Have you ever been here? Of course there are not many cows per square mile in some places, what are they going to eat? Sand?
Here is a happy snap from near the top of ULURU
And some of the desert areas where you may find a cattle station