The 5G War - Technology vs Humanity


As Above So Below
The links to the references (numbers) is on the link, for some reason they would not copy over to this thread all together...

The 5G War - Technology Versus Humanity

by Dr. Joseph Mercola

  • 5G relies primarily on the bandwidth of the millimeter wave, known to cause a painful burning sensation. It’s also been linked to eye and heart problems, suppressed immune function, genetic damage and fertility problems
  • FCC admits no 5G safety studies have been conducted or funded by the agency or telecom industry, and that none are planned
  • The FCC has been captured by the telecom industry, which in turn has perfected the disinformation strategies employed by the tobacco industry before it
  • Persistent exposures to microwave frequencies like those from cellphones can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and nuclear DNA damage from free radicals produced from peroxynitrite
  • Excessive exposures to cellphones and Wi-Fi networks have been linked to chronic diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s and infertility

Exposure to electromagnetic field (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) radiation is an ever-growing health risk in the modern world. The Cellular Phone Task Force website1 has a long list of governments and organizations that have issued warnings or banned wireless technologies of various kinds and under various circumstances, starting in 1993.

A long list of organizations representing doctors and scientists are also among them, including an appeal for protection from nonionizing EMF exposure by more than 230 international EMF scientists to the United Nations in 2015, which notes that:2

"Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines.

Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system,3,4,5 learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life."

A call for a moratorium on 5G specifically was issued in September 2017 by more than 180 scientists and doctors from 35 countries,6,7 "until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry," noting that "RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment," and that "5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place."

In an article8 on the Environmental Health Trust's website, Ronald Powell, Ph.D., a retired Harvard scientist of applied physics, notes "there is NO SAFE WAY to implement 5G in our communities; rather there are only 'bad ways' and 'worse ways,'" and rather than argue about who should have control over its deployment, we should focus on preventing its employment altogether.

Health Concerns Over 5G Abound
Wall Street analyst Sunil Rajgopal recently warned mounting health concerns may delay the implementation of 5G, Fortune magazine reports.9 Some countries have already taken steps to slow 5G deployment due to health risks, Rajgopal notes. The question is, can it be stopped?

5G testing was recently halted in Brussels, Belgium,10 and Switzerland is delaying its 5G rollout in order to create a system to monitor radiation.11 Syracuse, New York, is also attempting to set up some safeguards and has "negotiated the right to conduct on-demand safety inspections of 5G antennas," to allay public concerns.12 According to Forbes:13

"In New Hampshire, lawmakers are considering establishing a commission to study the health impacts of 5G networks. And Mill Valley, Calif., near San Francisco, last year banned new 5G wireless cells."

Many other areas, however, have chosen to trust the Federal Communications Commission and the wireless industry trade association, CTIA, which has created a "Cellphone Health Facts" website citing research showing no risk. However, if you believe the FCC is assessing health risks, you'd be wrong.

At a recent senate commerce hearing (above), the FCC admitted that no 5G safety studies have been conducted or funded by the agency or the telecom industry, and that none are planned.14,15 In a speech given at the National Press Club in June 2016, Tom Wheeler, former FCC chairman and prior head of the wireless industry lobbying group, made the agency's stance clear when he said:16

"Stay out of the way of technological development. Unlike some countries, we do not believe we should spend the next couple of years studying … Turning innovators loose is far preferable to letting committees and regulators define the future. We won't wait for the standards ... "

In light of the more than 2,000 studies showing a wide range of biological harm from EMFs, assurances from the FCC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that wireless radiation exposures, including 5G, is safe, seem disingenuous at best. As noted in a recent Counterpunch article:17

"Telecom lobbyists assure us that guidelines already in place are adequate to protect the public. Those safety guidelines, however, are based on a 1996 study of how much a cell phone heated the head of an adult-sized plastic mannequin. This is problematic, for at least three reasons:

    • living organisms consist of highly complex and interdependent cells and tissue, not plastic.
    • those being exposed to radiofrequency radiation include fetuses, children, plants, and wildlife – not just adult male humans.
    • the frequencies used in the mannequin study were far lower than the exposures associated with 5G."
What Level of EMF Can Humans Withstand?

EMF exposure at many biological impacting frequencies, such as those that run cellphones and Wi-Fi, has increased about 1 quintillion times over the past 100 years.18,19 Unfortunately, EMF exposure is so widespread these days, it's virtually impossible to conduct controlled population studies anymore, as no population is truly unexposed or unaffected. This lack of a control group makes it very difficult to determine what the real-world effects are.

That said, one controlled exposure study has been done, revealing it's nowhere near as harmless as people think. At the beginning of the 20th century, there were two populations in the United States — rural and urban. Urban areas were by and large electrified, while rural areas were not electrified until around 1950.

Dr. Sam Milham, an epidemiologist, painstakingly analyzed mortality statistics between these two populations over time, clearly showing there was a wide difference in mortality from heart disease, cancer and diabetes between these two groups. Then, as rural areas became electrified, the two curves merged.

Today, we not only live and work in electrified surroundings, we're also surrounded by microwaves from wireless technologies. Soon, 5G may be added to the mix, making exposures all the more complex and potentially harmful. As noted by Counterpunch:20

"5G radiofrequency (RF) radiation uses a 'cocktail' of three types of radiation, ranging from relatively low-energy radio waves, microwave radiation with far more energy, and millimeter waves with vastly more energy …

The extremely high frequencies in 5G are where the biggest danger lies. While 4G frequencies go as high as 6 GHz, 5G exposes biological life to pulsed signals in the 30 GHz to 100 GHz range. The general public has never before been exposed to such high frequencies for long periods of time."

Health Concerns Linked to 5G Exposure

The added concern 5G brings is the addition of the millimeter wave (MMW). This bandwidth, which runs from 30 gigahertz (GHz) to 300GHz,21 is known to penetrate up to 2 millimeters into human skin tissue,22,23 causing a burning sensation.

This is precisely why MMW was chosen for use in crowd control weapons (Active Denial Systems) by the U.S. Department of Defense.24 MMW is also used in so-called "naked body scanners" at airports.25

Research has shown sweat ducts in human skin act as receptors or antennae for 5G radiation, drawing the radiation into the body,26,27,28,29,30 thereby causing a rise in temperature. This in part helps explain the painful effect. As noted by Dr. Yael Stein — who has studied 5G MMW technology and its interaction with the human body — in a 2016 letter to the Federal Communications Commission:31

"Computer simulations have demonstrated that sweat glands concentrate sub-terahertz waves in human skin. Humans could sense these waves as heat. The use of sub-terahertz (millimeter wave) communications technology (cellphones, Wi-Fi, antennas) could cause humans to percept physical pain via nociceptors.

Potentially, if 5G Wi-Fi is spread in the public domain we may expect more of the health effects currently seen with RF/ microwave frequencies including many more cases of hypersensitivity (EHS), as well as many new complaints of physical pain and a yet unknown variety of neurologic disturbances.

It will be possible to show a causal relationship between G5 technology and these specific health effects. The affected individuals may be eligible for compensation."

MMW has also been linked to:32,33,34,35,36

    • Eye problems such as lens opacity in rats, which is linked to the production of cataracts,37 and eye damage in rabbits38,39
    • Impacted heart rate variability, an indicator of stress, in rats40,41,42 and heart rate changes (arrhythmias) in frogs43,44
    • Pain45
    • Suppressed immune function46
    • Depressed growth and increased antibiotic resistance in bacteria47
As noted in a recent article:48

"Many scientists understand that the electromagnetic radiation leaking through the doors of our microwave ovens are carcinogenic, and therefore, can cause cancer. Most of these scientists also believe that these waves are mutagenic, meaning they change the DNA structure of living beings.49

The launch of 5G will be similar to turning on your microwave, opening its door, and leaving it on for the rest of your life. There's good reason why hundreds of scientists are taking action against the wireless industry."

Understanding EMFs' Mechanisms of Harm

As explained in my 2017 interview with Martin Pall, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of biochemistry and basic medical sciences at Washington State University, the primary danger of EMFs in general is that it causes excess oxidative stress that results in mitochondrial dysfunction.

According to Pall's research,50,51,52,53radiofrequency microwave radiation such as that from your cellphone and wireless router activates the voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) located in the outer membrane of your cells.

According to Pall, VGCCs are 7.2 million times more sensitive to microwave radiation than the charged particles inside and outside our cells, which means the safety standards for this exposure are off by a factor of 7.2 million.

Low-frequency microwave radiation opens your VGCCs, thereby allowing an abnormal influx of calcium ions into the cell, which in turn activates nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide which react nearly instantaneously to form peroxynitrite54that then causes carbonate free radicals, which are one of the most damaging reactive nitrogen species known and thought to be a root cause for many of today's chronic diseases.

For an in-depth understanding of peroxynitrites and the harm they inflict, see "Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease"55 — a 140-page free access paper with 1,500 references written by Dr. Pal Pacher, Joseph Beckman and Dr. Lucas Liaudet.

One of its most significant hazards of peroxynitrite is that it damages DNA. The European REFLEX study published in 2004 revealed the nonthermal effects of 2G and 3G radiation are actually very similar to the effects of X-rays in terms of the genetic damage they cause.56

Your body has the capacity to repair that damage through a family of 17 different enzymes collectively called poly ADP ribose polymerases (PARP). However, while PARP work well, they require NAD+ for fuel and when they run out of NAD+ they stop repairing your DNA.

This in turn can lead to premature cell death, since 100 to 150 NAD+ molecules are needed to repair a single DNA strand break. NAD+ is central to maintaining cellular and mitochondrial health, so the fact that PARP consumes NAD+ to counteract EMF damage is an important concern.

Cancer Is Not the Primary Health Risk of EMF

The voltage in your body appears to play a significant role in health and disease. Your body's production of electricity allows your cells to communicate and perform basic biological functions necessary for your survival. However, your body is designed to operate at very specific levels and frequencies.

It seems logical that being surrounded by man-made EMFs that are 1 quintillion times higher than the natural EMF environment of the Earth may interfere with your DNA's ability to receive and transmit biological signals.

While the controversy over EMF damage has centered around whether or not it can cause cancer, especially brain tumors, this actually isn't your greatest concern. Since the damage is strongly linked to activation of your VGCCs, it stands to reason that areas where VGCCs are the densest would be most vulnerable to damage.

As it happens, the highest density of VGCCs are found in your nervous system, your brain, the pacemaker in your heart and in male testes. As a result, EMFs are likely to contribute to neurological and neuropsychiatric57 problems, heart and reproductive problems.

This includes but is not limited to cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer's and infertility. Indeed, this is what researchers keep finding, and all of these health problems are far more prevalent and kill more people than brain cancer.

What's more, seeing how many are already struggling with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, saturating cities and suburban areas with MMW radiation will undoubtedly make the problem more widespread, and make life unbearable for those already feeling the effects of wireless radiation.

Most Recent Media Ploy to Detract From 5G Concerns: Blame the Russians

In a recent Medium article,58 Devra Davis, Ph.D. — a well-respected and credentialed researcher on the dangers of cellphone radiation — highlights a recent media trend: Write off scientists warning about 5G dangers as "untethered alarmists … linked to Russian propaganda."

"Could it be a coincidence that following on the heels of the NY Times story, the Wall Street Journal and the UK Telegraph have echoed the same smear of guilt by association," she writes,59adding:

"These otherwise credible media sources ignore the substantial body of science pinpointing hazards of wireless radiation and 5G detailed in independent journalistic investigations that have appeared extensively in media throughout Europe and been covered by major networks …

Could the failure to report these critical 5G issues and correct misleading information regarding health effects of wireless and 5G in the New York Times have anything to do with the their new joint venture with Verizon in 5G journalism, or the fact that the Times board of directors includes officials from Facebook, Verizon, Media Lab, and other stalwarts of the telecom industry, while Carlos Slim, head of some of the largest telecom firms in the world, has downsized and now owns just 15 percent of its stock?"

Davis also points out a clear difference between American and Russian scientific expertise with regard to EMF:

"The history of research on the environmental and public health impacts of radio frequency microwave radiation ('wireless radiation') reveals some uneasy parallels with that of tobacco.

In the 1950s and 1960s, scientists who showed the harmful impacts of tobacco found themselves struggling for serious attention and financial support. The validity of their views was only accepted after the toll of sickness and death had become undeniable.

For health impacts from wireless radiation, a similar pattern is emerging. Each time a U.S. government agency produced positive findings, research on health impacts was defunded.

The Office of Naval Research, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and the Environmental Protection Agency all once had vibrant research programsdocumenting dangers of wireless radiation. All found their programs scrapped, reflecting pressure from those who sought to suppress this work.

Russian's 50 years of research on electromagnetic radiation since the Cold War has led to their clear understanding that this exposure does have biological effects. The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection issued a 2011 Resolution60 recommending persons under 18 not use a cell phone."

Brain Cancer Risk Is Likely Real

While heart disease, dementia and infertility overshadow the risk of brain cancer, the possibility of cancer still remains, and may be a far more significant concern for young children who are growing up surrounded by wireless technologies than we realize.

The fact is, we won't know for sure whether in utero and early cellphone use will increase brain cancer rates until a decade or two from now when today's youths have grown up. Mounting research suggests cellphone radiation certainly influences your risk, and there are a number of compelling anecdotal reports that are hard to ignore.

In her article,61 Davis mentions Robert C. Kane, a senior telecom engineer "had willingly served as a guinea pig for Motorola and other companies developing new wireless technologies in the 1980s."

He developed a type of malignant brain cancer the National Toxicology Program later confirmed was a side effect of cellphone radiation exposure (see video above). The NTPs results were published in 2018. Before his death in 2002, Kane published the book, "Cellphone Radiation — Russian Roulette,"62 in which he stated that:63

"Never in human history has there been such a practice as we now encounter with the marketing and distributing of products hostile to the human biological system by an industry with foreknowledge of those effects."

FCC Is a Captured Agency That Cannot Be Trusted

Davis also highlights another crucial problem, namely the fact that the FCC has been captured by the telecom industry, which in turn has perfected the disinformation strategies employed by the tobacco industry before it. She writes:64

"… n 2015 a Harvard expose tracked the revolving door between the FCC and the telecom industry and concluded that the FCC is a captured agency and that 'Consumer safety, health, and privacy, along with consumer wallets, have all been overlooked, sacrificed, or raided due to unchecked industry influence.'"

The book in question is "Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission Is Dominated by the Industries It Presumably Regulates," written by investigative journalist Norm Alster.65

As just one example, before his role as FCC chairman, Wheeler headed up the CTIA, which is the lobbying group for the wireless industry, which explains his commentary on 5G and why the FCC doesn't believe in studying its health risks and "won't wait for the standards."

The book also shows how the telecom industry is manipulating public opinion by undermining the credibility of scientists that speak of dangers, cutting funds for research, publishing manipulated studies showing no harm and claiming "scientific consensus" of no harm when no such consensus actually exists. Naturally, the telecom industry also spends millions of dollars lobbying the FCC on issues that might impact its bottom line.66

5G Threatens Weather Prediction
Interestingly, aside from potential health ramifications, a global 5G network will also threaten our ability to predict weather which, in addition to putting civilians at risk will also jeopardize the Navy.67 According to a recent paper68 in the journal Nature, widespread 5G coverage will prevent satellites from detecting changes in water vapor, which is how meteorologists predict weather changes and storms.

Davis quotes69 Stephen English, meteorologist at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts: "This is the first time we've seen a threat to what I'd call the crown jewels of our frequencies  — the ones that we absolutely must defend come what may."

Alas, the FCC ignores such concerns and, according to Davis, "weather experts within the U.S. government are being muzzled." In a recent letter to the FCC, Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., urge the agency to rein in the expansion of wireless communications in the 24 GHz band for this reason.70

Educate Yourself About the Health Risks of 5G and Protect Your Family From Harm

I am currently writing a book on EMF dangers, which will be a comprehensive resource on current technologies. In the meantime, to learn more about 5G and help educate others, you can download a two-page 5G fact sheet71 from the Environmental Health Trust. On their website, you can also access a long list of published scientific studies showing cause for concern.72

To reduce your EMF exposure, read through the suggestions below and implement as many of them as possible. Additional guidance and solutions for mitigating electric and magnetic fields can also be found at the end of "Healthy Wiring Practices,"73 a document created by building biologist Oram Miller, whom I've interviewed on this topic.

Nighttime remediation

Use Stetzer or Greenwave filters to remove voltage transients from your electricity and use meters to confirm that they are in a safe range.

Use a battery-powered alarm clock, ideally one without any light. I use a talking clock for the visually impaired.74

Consider moving your baby's bed into your room instead of using a wireless baby monitor. Alternatively, use a hard-wired monitor.

If you must use Wi-Fi, shut it off when not in use, especially at night when you are sleeping. Ideally, work toward hardwiring your house so you can eliminate Wi-Fi altogether. It's important to realize that if you have a Wi-Fi router, you have a cellphone tower inside your home. Ideally, you'd eliminate your Wi-Fi and simply use a wired Ethernet connection.

If you absolutely must have a router, you can place it inside a shielded bag when not in use. You can find shielded items online, or make your own using Swiss Shield fabric. If you have a notebook without any Ethernet ports, a USB Ethernet adapter will allow you to connect to the internet with a wired connection.

For more extensive shielding, you can consider painting your bedroom walls and ceiling with special shielding paint, which will block RF from outside sources, such as cell towers, smart meters and radio/TV towers. Windows can be covered with metal window screen or film. For your bed, consider a shielding bed canopy.

Daytime strategies to reduce unnecessary EMF exposure

To reduce EMF exposure during the daytime, consider using Stetzer filters to decrease the level of dirty electricity or electromagnetic interference being generated. You can also take these with you to work or when you travel. This may be the single best strategy to reduce the damage from EMF exposure since it appears that most of it is generated by the frequencies that the filters remove.

Connect your desktop computer to the internet via a wired Ethernet connection and be sure to put your desktop in airplane mode. Also avoid wireless keyboards, trackballs, mice, game systems, printers and portable house phones. Opt for the wired versions.

Avoid carrying your cellphone on your body unless in airplane mode and never sleep with it in your bedroom unless it is in airplane mode. Even in airplane mode it can emit signals, which is why I put my phone in a Faraday bag.75 They are really inexpensive and only $10 for two of them. I tested them and they are highly effective at blocking radiation.

When using your cellphone, use the speaker phone and hold the phone at least 3 feet away from you. Seek to radically decrease your time on the cellphone. I typically use my cellphone less than 30 minutes a month, and mostly when traveling. Instead, use VoIP software phones that you can use while connected to the internet via a wired connection, or better yet, use a landline telephone.

General household remediation

If you still use a microwave oven, consider replacing it with a steam convection oven, which will heat your food as quickly and far more safely.

Avoid using "smart" appliances and thermostats that depend on wireless signaling. This would include all new "smart" TVs. They are called smart because they emit a Wi-Fi signal and, unlike your computer, you cannot shut the Wi-Fi signal off. Consider using a large computer monitor as your TV instead, as they don't emit Wi-Fi.

Replace CFL bulbs with incandescent bulbs. Ideally remove all fluorescent lights from your house. Not only do they emit unhealthy light, but more importantly, they will actually transfer current to your body just being close to the bulbs.

Dimmer switches are another source of dirty electricity, so consider installing regular on/off switches rather than dimmer switches.

Refuse smart meters as long as you can, or add a shield to an existing smart meter, some of which have been shown to reduce radiation by 98 to 99 percent.




I don't know if this has been covered in the thread so far, But this particular aspect is not paranormal, This news is factual and can be sourced. Meteorology services worldwide are in an uproar about 5g technology, As 5g at it peak performance functions at 24 GHz The same frequency weather satellites function at, The fear is, 5g will interfere with weather tracking services and set back meteorology decades. affecting the accuracy of readouts by as much as 30 percent.

5G could mean less time to flee a deadly hurricane, heads of NASA and NOAA warn


As Above So Below


As Above So Below
Good to see, people need to stand up to this technology, it requires more testing and research to determine its safety to not only humans but the wildlife, animals and plants...


Thousands take to the streets of Switzerland protesting against 5G mobile phones signals amid fears the electromagnetic technology could damage people's health

The protesters, many carrying placards, gathered in front of the Swiss parliament building in Bern yesterday in a bid to stop the construction of more 5G-compatible antennae. Critics say the electromagnetic radiation the new system emits poses unprecedented health and environmental risks compared to previous generations of mobile technology. The Swiss Federation of Doctors (FMH) has also argued for a cautious approach to the new technology.



As Above So Below

As hundreds of 65ft mobile towers are set to transform internet speeds, residents in towns such as Totnes are fighting back

A park in Hove has seen the early skirmishes in a battle spreading across Britain.

There, this summer, a planning application was lodged to replace a mobile phone mast with one capable of transmitting 5G — the fifth generation of wireless technology.

Not only does it promise superfast download speeds for smartphones, but to change how we live — paving the way for everything from self-driving cars to wearable health devices providing round-the-clock monitoring.

But not everyone in this affluent South Coast community believes it’s a future they want to be part of. Of 146 letters sent to the local council, all but one objected to the proposal.

And of those objections, virtually all highlighted concerns about the risks they claim 5G poses to human health.

Among those opposing the plan are Richard and Myra Bianco, who called for the installation to be blocked until more research was carried out. ‘So little is known about the effects on human health that it worries me companies are being given the go-ahead to use this technology,’ said Mrs Bianco, 71. ‘It doesn’t seem right. They should carry out independent tests then install them — not the other way round.’

Another letter lodged with the council reads: ‘The launch of 5G will be similar to turning on your microwave, opening its door, and leaving it on for the rest of your life. These towers are not only dangerous — they’re lethal!’

A third commented: ‘My concern is particularly centred with children . . . 5G is 1,500 times stronger than 3G and 4G . . . I urge you to stop this going ahead.’

Those sentiments are not confined to this corner of Britain. This week it emerged that opponents of 5G in Totnes, Devon, have persuaded their council to demand a moratorium on the new network’s installation. Similar steps have been taken in Frome and Glastonbury, across the border in Somerset.

Cancer, damage to the nervous system and reduced fertility are the main concerns, with claims that 5G will turn out to be the ‘asbestos and tobacco’ of the 21st century.

Some online contibutors warn of a 5G ‘apocalypse’ caused by ‘dangerous microwaves that destroy living matter’. Humans, birds and insect life are all said to be at imminent risk.

(more on the link)



It was bad enough when we were warned that 4G radiation would cause cancer and nervous problems. Now it looks like we will be dosed with 5G.


As Above So Below
I found out today that the power company came by my house and took off the old meter and installed one of those wireless meters, the location is on the outside wall of my living room...I am not liking this one bit, I have to think of what to do, I am not going to have that thing flooding my living room with wireless signals...Grrrr!...



I found out today that the power company came by my house and took off the old meter and installed one of those wireless meters, the location is on the outside wall of my living room...I am not liking this one bit, I have to think of what to do, I am not going to have that thing flooding my living room with wireless signals...Grrrr!...

It's one of those "grid issues" I'm afraid. You could switch to solar and battery power, but one thing is for certain, You have no choice but to have electricity. If you can, I'd recommend getting off the grid completely, But, To be fair, It may not even be a possible thing.

This man was arrested for trying to live off the grid on his own land. Court: Man Can’t Live Off Grid On His Own Land - Off The Grid News People just arent allowed to have true independence anymore. I would go into a rant about How Real freedom is an illusion and a lie. But, We all know this, I'm just pointing out how much the system outright sucks is all, brother :(


As Above So Below
I'm drawing up a plan to divert the signals from that thing away from the house...:big_boss:



I'm drawing up a plan to divert the signals from that thing away from the house...:big_boss:

I recently learned a lot about boosting wifi signals. I was originally going to spend a fortune on those 100$ wifi boosters, Then I began reading up on how to boost a signal in one direction brother. Believe it or not, 802.11 g.b.n "Basically all radio and wifi" Can be reflected away with simple aluminum foil or cans.

I used this method to boost my wifi to my half-built garage and it did boost my signal in the direction of the bends in the cans while sacrificing the other directions, It's like a reflector dish. This method will shield your living room while reflecting the signal away from your home. As far as if it looks pretty or not, It all depends on how much effort you put into it, But, Aluminum foil or even cans will reflect the signal away brother. I can testify for as red neck as this seems, It 100% works.
Last edited:


As Above So Below
We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe
The technology is coming, but contrary to what some people say, there could be health risks

The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of "fear mongering" over the advent of wireless technology's 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.

The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.

Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.

Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:

“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”

The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.

(more on the link)


Dejan Corovic

As above, so bellow
And 5G doesn't sound as a much of technology at all. It is faster, but it has very short range, maybe not even 100m 300ft.


This Study is from Microwaves, Radio Waves, and Other Types of Radiofrequency Radiation

Here are some Quips about Radiation from the article, You are welcome to read it, It's long and boring and it even beats around the bush with nondefinititivity,

Anyway here is the thing from the bullshit article. Which is seemingly official. High frequency like Gamma and Low frequency like Radio signals. They go on to state that, A day in the Sun is most generally more harmful than most forums of Radio waves. From the article, " Radiation exists across a spectrum from very high-energy (high-frequency) radiation to very low-energy (low-frequency) radiation. This is sometimes referred to as the electromagnetic spectrum. Examples of high-energy radiation include X-Rays and Gamma Rays. They, as well as some higher energy UV radiation, are called ionizing radiation, which means they have enough energy to remove an electron from (ionize) an atom or molecule. This can damage the DNA inside of cells, which can result in cancer.

Radiofrequency (RF) radiation, which includes radio waves and microwaves, is at the low-energy end of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is a type of non-ionizing radiation. Non-ionizing radiation has enough energy to move atoms in a molecule around or cause them to vibrate, but not enough to ionize (remove charged particles such as electrons). RF radiation has lower energy than some other types of non-ionizing radiation, like visible light and infrared, but it has higher energy than Extremely low frequency or ELF Radiation. If RF radiation is absorbed in large enough amounts by materials containing water, such as food, fluids, and body tissues, it can produce heat. This can lead to burns and tissue damage. Although RF radiation does not cause cancer by damaging DNA in cells the way ionizing radiation does, there has been a concern that some forms of non-ionizing radiation might have biological effects that could result in cancer in some circumstances.

THey compare Both Lab studies and studies on people and conclude. Often neither type of study provides enough evidence on its own, so researchers usually look at both lab-based and human studies when trying to figure out if something causes cancer.

.. My own thoughts, Of course, we are going to get these non-conclusive results. As long as a person can make money by killing people There will always be someone who will want that money. So, We, " The public" get the half-ass, Ho-hum answers where the scientists are all twiddling their thumbs because they are busy cashing paychecks. To be honest, We already know Radio waves are a form of radiation, And even if they site that well it's just low levels of emissions, We are still bombarded by these constantly, consistently, and they continue to increase this frequency, While That Page I linked to, proves that even normal radio waves can and will cause Heart and brain tumors when a subject is constantly exposed.

What really upsets me is, People are frightened and looking for answers, so when we go to google, We get some stuffy shirt saying, Radio waves are low-frequency emissions and you get more radiation sitting in a room that has a microwave in it. Doesn't this sound a lot like those old Ads from the fifties? about How, People are wrong, And Smoking is good for you? "I'm not bashing smoking, I'm a smoker myself. However, We all know it's unhealthy, so why lie about it?" I'm just saying, As long as there are people willing to accept huge paychecks to speak, We are going to get contradictory answers.

I strongly suggest people keep in mind, We use Radio waves to cook our damned food, Of fucking course, this is dangerous. :(

Sp, Out.
Last edited:


As Above So Below
British Man Claims 5G Protective Paint Guards Him from Severe 5G Illnesses

Outside of the coronavirus and elections, few subjects are more controversial these days than 5G — the fifth generation technology standard for broadband cellular networks that began rolling out in 2019 despite a flood of concerns about its safety. Both sides cite evidence and sometimes unproven science to build their cases, but one man in England has no time for either because he believes 5G, along with other electromagnetic forces, is killing him – and he’d be dead already if he hadn’t completely covered his house in 5G protective paint. He’s even coated a shed where he can hide when his family turns on devices inside the house. Imagination, psychosis, conspiracy theory or a real example of the dangers of 5G?

“All these people on the TV and in the papers and saying ‘they’re just 5G idiots’ and all this but if you put me in front of somebody with a mobile phone or put electricity on you see what happens to me. Nobody can say it doesn’t affect you because I’m living proof.”

In an interview with the Northhamptonshire Telegraph and carried by DevonLive and other British media sites, Bruno Berrick, a 48-year-old living in Rothwell, Northamptonshire, details his sufferings that he believes are due to electrosensitivity or electromagnetic hypersensitivity caused by electromagnetic fields (EMF) – a diagnosis that is not accepted by a majority of medical professionals. Nonetheless, Berrick swears there is something wrong with him that began four years ago when he felt fatigued, experienced burning sensations, heard “popping in his head” and lost 70 pounds. The former greyhound trainer claims to have spent £200,000 ($265,000) traveling the world in search of a diagnosis and a cure.

“In 2016 I got poisoned by pesticides because I lived next to a field that they were spraying but nobody knew what it was. I ended up about a year and a half later having to go to America, Seattle in Washington and they found it in about two days. They sent a urine sample to Kansas and it came back and said I was full of pesticides. Basically, it stripped my immune system. It went down to nothing and I kept getting infection after infection and it’s turned into this. Now, if I’m near a mobile phone I nearly collapse from the radiation from it.”

This told Berrick the original cause but not the cure. At a seminar, the presenter had the same symptoms, recommended he protect himself from all electromagnetic devises, supplied him with an EMF reader and instructed him to see where in the house the signal was the highest. That turned out to be his daughter’s room where a window face a nearby cell tower. While he doesn’t identify it as a 5G tower, that seems to be his assumption, as he moves his family to a remote area in Rutland (about an hour’s drive away) and covers his house completely with 5G protective paint. He’s also building a small shed, again covered with 5G paint, to stay in during the winter when his family turns on the heat – possibly from an electric furnace, although it’s not clear, just that it bothers him. Berrick claims these are the only places where he feels comfortable.

“When we used to live next to a phone tower and I was shaking physically and trembling inside. I’m in a house now that’s painted with 5G protective paint – the whole house. I came here, I’ve had four great months. When I stay in this house I’m an absolutely normal man.”


Does 5G shielding paint actually work? Berrick doesn’t say what brand he used, but there are a number of firms offering it with a wide variety of claims. (A chart provided for comparison purposes only.) While radiation shielding has been proven to work, it’s a good idea to view bold claims skeptically and search for independent evaluations.

What about Bruno Berrick? He claims to have gained weight and feels better after coating his house with 5G paint and moving away from a cell tower. However, he doesn’t give more info on his immune system, weakened by pesticide exposure, and what else, if anything, he’s done to combat that. While the scientific explanations of 5G’s potential are solid, it’s wise to take statements on their degree of harmfulness skeptically – just as from all businesses making obscene profits from technology. While eyewitness claims like those of Bruno Berrick are believable, it would be better with a doctor’s report and an independent analysis of the EMF and 5G waves at his house.

No one said this would be easy.



As Above So Below
Officials show scary health threats of 5G on people and planet in new major study

Story at-a-glance:
  • Newest data from the New Hampshire legislative commission confirms wireless technology produces significant negative effects on humans, animals, insects and plants.
  • In the race for hyper-fast internet speed and connectivity, experts are making comparisons between the release of 5G and the lies told by the tobacco and oil industries.
  • The structure required to support 5G will place cell antenna ports close to your home and workplace, making it nearly impossible to avoid and raising your risk of excessive oxidative stress that may lead to anxiety, depression and Alzheimer’s.
  • It is important to get involved in helping to prevent implementation of 5G by contacting your local lawmakers and signing local petitions. Consider taking steps in your home to reduce exposure.

(More on the link)



As Above So Below
That is pure insanity! Largest review finds 5G is not linked to adverse health risks

Two new large-scale reviews have concluded that 5G is totally safe for use around humans. And that is pure… insanity!

“In conclusion, a review of all the studies provided no substantiated evidence that low-level radio waves, like those used by the 5G network, are hazardous to human health.” said Dr Ken Karipidis, Assistant Director of Assessment and Advice at ARPANSA.

The reviews were conducted by the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) in collaboration with Swinburne University of Technology, with the first encompassing a huge array of 138 studies that have been conducted into the science of 5G radio waves, and the second reanalyzing 107 studies on their safety. The studies ranged in investigations, with many looking into the cellular effects of 5G and similar frequency radio waves.

Surprisingly, both reviews found that there were no correlations between 5G implementation and adverse health or cellular effects. Those that did show any issues appeared to have fundamental methodological flaws.

“Studies that did report biological effects were generally not independently replicated and most of the studies reviewed employed low-quality methods of exposure assessment and control,” said Dr Karipidis.

The authors express a desire for long-term studies to continue to monitor them, as all good science should – but to date, there is absolutely no evidence supporting the absurd claims linked to 5G.

We recommend that future experimental studies improve their design with particular attention to dosimetry and temperature control and that future epidemiological studies continue to monitor long-term health effects in the population related to wireless telecommunications,” he continued.

I think most of these ‘scientists’ did not take into account previous warnings and scientific studies as presented in the following articles and others:
It is not very reassuring that ‘robust’ science backs up a rollout of new technology, easing the minds of many who had serious concerns and wanted assurance… What do you think? [IFLS]



I know there are 5G and microchip implant conspiracy theories floating out there. What I would be VERY concerned about is when the subliminal pushing for implants begins. I have already seen a few advertisements stating how wonderful life will be when you don’t need to carry cash or credit cards on your person.

You just use the chip implanted in your hand to scan for your purchases. Hmmm? What happens when your chip suddenly doesn’t work? I should be long gone from this Earth before that happens.