Thanks for posting that Dejan,, I remember these pictures [there were five in all, the one you posted was the best of them] from a few years ago .. it's one of those pictures that looks too good to be true, and so probably is. But just like all of these good UFO photos, well never really know for sure? .. I mean, if the photographic experts from the official centres can't even agree about it's validity with their hands-on technical resources , then what chance have we armchair researchers got? ... oh, of course you'll inevitably get a whole slew of biased armchair debunkers that claim special technical-abilities [backed by the words scientific and critical thinking] that totally 'debunk' the picture and the guy's integrity [to their own satisfaction] and proclaim 'the job done' ... but in reality all that they have to go on is the same as us! ... A decent looking picture on a computer screen with no way of really knowing what they are looking at ... but unlike us, they have already made their minds up that it's a fake because they know there are no flying saucers!"For nearly two years, a Montana man has kept two cameras pointed at the sky with the deep hope and belief that something might be out there. And then, after nearly 280,000 photos, it happened. Or maybe not. But his findings of what he believes are two unidentified flying objects have the community of UFO fans and experts abuzz. Who is this guy? Dr. Richard O'Connor is a retired anesthesiologist. And he says that as a boy in 1947 he touched wreckage from the UFO crash in Roswell, N.M. — his dad was one of the investigators. Paging Mulder and Skully."
The Short List: NORAD tracks Santa, violent storms, UFOs
John MacDonald UFO photo. John Macdonald says this photograph was taken at Rossie Ochil, Perthshire, whilst driving home to Dysart, Fife on Sunday 6 March, 2016 at around 11 p.m.
UFOs Light Up The Scottish Sky | HuffPost
View attachment 11271
A sketch I did of what I think we are seeing (with a road drawn in). Many UFOs like Cocoyoc seem to be made of a flexible programmable matter.
View attachment 11272
The Lubbock Lights juxtaposed with Scottish photo, so it is easy to see the similarity of the lights:
View attachment 11273
Thanks for posting that Dejan,, I remember these pictures [there were five in all, the one you posted was the best of them] from a few years ago .. it's one of those pictures that looks too good to be true, and so probably is. But just like all of these good UFO photos, well never really know for sure? .. I mean, if the photographic experts from the official centres can't even agree about it's validity with their hands-on technical resources , then what chance have we armchair researchers got? ... oh, of course you'll inevitably get a whole slew of biased armchair debunkers that claim special technical-abilities [backed by the words scientific and critical thinking] that totally 'debunk' the picture and the guy's integrity [to their own satisfaction] and proclaim 'the job done' ... but in reality all that they have to go on is the same as us! ... A decent looking picture on a computer screen with no way of really knowing what they are looking at ... but unlike us, they have already made their minds up that it's a fake because they know there are no flying saucers!
And so, all of the open minded viewers can do is scan the picture hoping that there just might be some tell-tale sign of validity, and then try to assess the character of the guy that presented the photo's.
... here he is, a YT film with O'Connor talking about [his obsession] Dr. Jesse Marcel jr...
... and here is his website ... Crop Circles Research Foundation | “ADOPT. ADAPT. EVOLVE.”
... now I don't know about you mate, but [and I hate to say it] I can't put my finger on it, but I wouldn't feel comfortable about buying a 'time-share-holiday-flat' from the guy. ... but of course I could be wrong. ... by the way, talking about 'debunks'.... did you see the two limp attempts that were doing the rounds at the time? ... 'Rain Drops' was seriously argued for! ... and the guy at NUFORC [Peter Davenport] went with ... ((NUFORC Note: Possible white birds? PD))
ndxLocOut ... both of which makes me smile.
Cheers Buddy.
That's why so-called "common sense" is just a total nuisance. Common sense can't even explain how aeroplanes work, otherwise Egyptians, who were prodigious experts in a common sense, would had been flying aeroplanes and helicopters.
This comes to mind.
This comes to mind.
You're confusing common sense with common knowledge...
...
She didn't "outsmart" him she just "dumbed him down" or to be more current, "Trumped" him using her arbitrary authority over the crowd. It's exactly Catholic Church vs Galileo moment. Or even better Iranian mullah vs Charles Darwin moment, since Darwinism is banned from teaching in schools in 90% of Muslim countries. And crowd is going to pay for obedience to irrational authority by living in a primitive and backward society. Obviously, the only problem is that that's what the crowd wants in the first place.
Good luck to her creating the modern age out of her "wood, fire & rock" analogy.
I guess the unspoken question is: why is crap like that stuck in my head? I spent 15 minutes yesterday looking for the thermos that was right where I put it. Yet a scene from an old '90s tv show - an episode I may not have seen since then - pops into my thoughts.
Another thread - do we really absorb it all and just have a problem with our FAT table?
Fair enough. But there is a lot of ambiguity because these two terms overlap with each other and common knowledge can become common sense and vice versa. That's ambiguity which comes with all the human languages that are by their nature imprecize.
The common sense and common knowledge I am refering to is ignorance, the "knowledge" of Qanon and flat-earther kind.
That's common understanding...
A common understanding is developed in these types of social belief systems to ensure that consistent common knowledge and common sense is applied towards the solution or topic being delivered...
...
Those are great too! Some of them also crossed my mind. I was mostly referring to the size and spacing and non-glare quality of the "Lubbock Lights" and the Scottish photo.Can't understand the 'Lubbock Lights' comparison? ... imo, there are a lot better matches than the LL.
Who knows, but I get the feeling that there is a bit of the old Ed Walters about this guy. ... and doesn't that picture look a little too much like the Mother ship in close encounters of the third kind, to be coincidence?
Cheers Buddy.
Yes that's one of those kinda weird looking offerings that has been doing the rounds for over forty years Auggie.1960 Cordoba Argentina.
Ufo Over Barn In Snow Covered Field
(Original Caption) 3/22/1966-Climax, CO- Robert Rinker, a field technician at the mountain laboratory weather station on Chalk Mountain near here, discovered this unidentified object on his negative after he shot a roll of film in the area and processed it last year. Rinker said, "I haven't said it's a flying saucer yet." The photo has been sent to the University of Colorado for examination by UFO experts. Photo filed 11/16/1967.