Dejan Corovic
As above, so bellow
It would be nice to have a medical summary of the specific injuries they received. Various bits and pieces of the case floating about suggest that the witnesses had been cooked allive rather than ionised. Which once more brings out recurring observation that UFOs emitt microwaves.
Betty Cash had her full body exposed for not less than 30 sec. to whatever that machine was beaming out, so she suffered much more serious injuries than others. Cavities in her head developed blisters, there were blisters in here mouth and her eye sockets. Her eyes bulged out. I think she lived for another 30 years, but had many cancers. As I vaguely remember after arrival to hospital, doctors initially assumed that she was exposed to radioactivity and placed her into utility room with janitorial supplies, for fear that she herself was radioactive, I presume. So she, after that horrendous experience and in that state, had to suffer humiliation of being alone and hidden away with broomsticks and tissue paper rolls.
Back to physics. Her injuries suggest she was microvaved, not ionised by radioactivity. At that time US had mini nuclear reactors ready, and actually Stanton Freedman worked on that project. That UFO was untypical because it was throwing out flames through an exhaust at a bottom. Combining the above facts it is plausible that US strapped mini nuclear reactor into a vehicle, took it to a military airfield in Daytona, Ohio and started testing it. By necessity, craft had deliberately unstable "pogo stick" flight controls like any elongated vertical man made craft, so it was hard to control and it flew out of the air base perimeter. Fuel that mini reactor used was hydrogen and hydrogen can not be radioactive since it has only one proton in nuclei. But uranium core of the reactor would ablate through friction with fast flowing hydrogen fuel, so some radioactive material will be present in the exaust jet.
Betty stood some 100 yards 30m from the craft, maybe for 30 seconds or longer. Question is now, for somebody with knowledge of physics and engineering, to look at above clues and work out was it a classical UFO or was it a military test of mini nuclear reactor?
I am inclined to say that it was a classical UFO because military would never test something with nuclear reactor so close to civilian population. There is plenty of desert in Nevada to play with radioactive stuff. Second clue is that Betty's injuries are mostly from microvaves, not from radioactivity.
This is a very important question for ufology because it leads to reverse engineering of UFO propulsion.
There are many other cases that link UFOs to microwaves, most prominent one being RB-47 ELINT reconnesance aircraft case from 1957. Here is a Brad Sparks' reasonably dry, "no fluff" technnical summary of that case and microwave aspects of it. This is actually very good informative and factual read, highlighting many technical aspects of UFOs that turn up again and again, in peacemeal fashion, in hundre ds of other UFO cases. Reading that summary would help you to reduce the ammount of confusion in your own thinking on this subject.
Betty Cash had her full body exposed for not less than 30 sec. to whatever that machine was beaming out, so she suffered much more serious injuries than others. Cavities in her head developed blisters, there were blisters in here mouth and her eye sockets. Her eyes bulged out. I think she lived for another 30 years, but had many cancers. As I vaguely remember after arrival to hospital, doctors initially assumed that she was exposed to radioactivity and placed her into utility room with janitorial supplies, for fear that she herself was radioactive, I presume. So she, after that horrendous experience and in that state, had to suffer humiliation of being alone and hidden away with broomsticks and tissue paper rolls.
Back to physics. Her injuries suggest she was microvaved, not ionised by radioactivity. At that time US had mini nuclear reactors ready, and actually Stanton Freedman worked on that project. That UFO was untypical because it was throwing out flames through an exhaust at a bottom. Combining the above facts it is plausible that US strapped mini nuclear reactor into a vehicle, took it to a military airfield in Daytona, Ohio and started testing it. By necessity, craft had deliberately unstable "pogo stick" flight controls like any elongated vertical man made craft, so it was hard to control and it flew out of the air base perimeter. Fuel that mini reactor used was hydrogen and hydrogen can not be radioactive since it has only one proton in nuclei. But uranium core of the reactor would ablate through friction with fast flowing hydrogen fuel, so some radioactive material will be present in the exaust jet.
Betty stood some 100 yards 30m from the craft, maybe for 30 seconds or longer. Question is now, for somebody with knowledge of physics and engineering, to look at above clues and work out was it a classical UFO or was it a military test of mini nuclear reactor?
I am inclined to say that it was a classical UFO because military would never test something with nuclear reactor so close to civilian population. There is plenty of desert in Nevada to play with radioactive stuff. Second clue is that Betty's injuries are mostly from microvaves, not from radioactivity.
This is a very important question for ufology because it leads to reverse engineering of UFO propulsion.
There are many other cases that link UFOs to microwaves, most prominent one being RB-47 ELINT reconnesance aircraft case from 1957. Here is a Brad Sparks' reasonably dry, "no fluff" technnical summary of that case and microwave aspects of it. This is actually very good informative and factual read, highlighting many technical aspects of UFOs that turn up again and again, in peacemeal fashion, in hundre ds of other UFO cases. Reading that summary would help you to reduce the ammount of confusion in your own thinking on this subject.
Last edited: